Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب الأدب
Book of Manners
النَّهْيُ عَنِ التَّسْمِيَةِ بِمَلِكِ الْأَمْلَاكِ
Prohibition of taking the name King of Kings
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 7917
اُردوEn
أخبرنا أبو بكر بن بالَوَيهِ، حَدَّثَنَا موسى بن الحسن، حَدَّثَنَا هَوْذة بن خَليفة، حَدَّثَنَا عوف، عن خِلَاس ومحمد، عن أبي هريرة، أنَّ رسول الله ﷺ قال: "اشتدَّ غضبُ الله على رجل قتلَه رسولُ الله ﷺ واشتدَّ غضبُ الله على رجلٍ تسمَّى مَلِكَ الأملاك، لا مَلِكَ إِلَّا اللهُ ﷿" (1).
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7724 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7724 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Allah's anger is severe upon a man whom the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) has killed, and Allah's anger is also severe upon a man who named himself malik al-amlak (King of Kings) - whereas there is no (true) king except Allah, the Mighty and Majestic."
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) حديث صحيح، وهذا إسناد قوي متّصل من جهة محمد - وهو ابن سِيرِين - إن كان محفوظًا فيه، فإنَّ أحدًا لم يذكره في هذا الإسناد غير الحاكم، وخلاس - وهو ابن عمر الهجري - لم يسمع من أبي هريرة فيما قاله الإمام أحمد، وروايته في البخاري عن أبي هريرة مقرونة بمحمد بن سيرين.
Grading: This hadith is sahih, and this chain of it is qawi (strong) and muttasil (connected) through Muhammad bin Sirin, provided that his mention in this chain is preserved (mahfuz), because no one other than al-Hakim mentioned him in this chain.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): According to Imam Ahmad, Khilas (Ibn 'Amr al-Hajari) did not hear from Abu Hurayrah; that is why in Sahih al-Bukhari his narration from Abu Hurayrah is mentioned coupled (maqrunan) with the narration of Muhammad bin Sirin.
وأخرج شطره الثاني أحمد (16/ 10384) عن محمد بن جعفر وروح بن عبادة، عن عوف بن أبي جميلة، عن خلاس وحده، به.
Reference / Source: The second part of it was narrated by Imam Ahmad (16/ 10384) from Muhammad bin Ja'far (Ghundar) and Rawh bin 'Ubadah, with the chain 'Awf bin Abi Jamilah, from Khilas (alone).
وأخرج شطره الأول أحمد (13/ 8214)، والبخاري (4073)، ومسلم (1793) من طريق همام بن منبه، عن أبي هريرة.
Reference / Source: The first part of it was narrated by Imam Ahmad (13/ 8214), al-Bukhari (4073) and Muslim (1793) through the route of Hammam bin Munabbih, from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him).
Grading: This hadith is sahih, and this chain of it is qawi (strong) and muttasil (connected) through Muhammad bin Sirin, provided that his mention in this chain is preserved (mahfuz), because no one other than al-Hakim mentioned him in this chain.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): According to Imam Ahmad, Khilas (Ibn 'Amr al-Hajari) did not hear from Abu Hurayrah; that is why in Sahih al-Bukhari his narration from Abu Hurayrah is mentioned coupled (maqrunan) with the narration of Muhammad bin Sirin.
وأخرج شطره الثاني أحمد (16/ 10384) عن محمد بن جعفر وروح بن عبادة، عن عوف بن أبي جميلة، عن خلاس وحده، به.
Reference / Source: The second part of it was narrated by Imam Ahmad (16/ 10384) from Muhammad bin Ja'far (Ghundar) and Rawh bin 'Ubadah, with the chain 'Awf bin Abi Jamilah, from Khilas (alone).
وأخرج شطره الأول أحمد (13/ 8214)، والبخاري (4073)، ومسلم (1793) من طريق همام بن منبه، عن أبي هريرة.
Reference / Source: The first part of it was narrated by Imam Ahmad (13/ 8214), al-Bukhari (4073) and Muslim (1793) through the route of Hammam bin Munabbih, from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 7917
