Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب التفسير
Book of Tafsir
شَرْحُ مَعْنَى : ( مُسْتَقَرَّهَا وَمُسْتَوْدَعَهَا )
Explanation of the meaning of "its dwelling place and its place of deposit"
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 3346
اُردوEn
أخبرنا أبو عمرو عثمان بن أحمد الدَّقّاق ببغداد، حدثنا محمد بن عُبيد الله ابن أبي داود المُنادِي، حدثنا رَوْح بن عُبادة، حدثنا المسعودي، عن أبي صَخْرة جامع بن شدَّاد، عن صفوان بن مُحرِز، عن بُرَيدة الأسلمي قال: دخل قومٌ على رسول الله ﷺ فجعلوا يسألونه يقولون: أعطنا، حتى ساءَه ذلك، ودخل عليه آخرون فقالوا: جِئْنا نسلِّمُ على رسول الله ﷺ ونَتفقَّه في الدِّين، ونسأله عن بَدْءِ هذا الأمر، فقال: "كان اللهُ ولا شيء غيرُه"، وكان العرشُ على الماء، وكَتَبَ في الذِّكْر كلَّ شيء، ثم خَلَقَ سبعَ سماواتٍ". قال: ثم أتاه آتٍ فقال: إنَّ ناقتَكَ قد ذهبت، قال: فوَدِدتُ أني كنت تركتُها (1).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 3307 - صحيح
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 3307 - صحيح
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Buraydah al-Aslami (may Allah be pleased with him) that some people came to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) and began asking him (for wealth), saying: "Give to us," until this displeased him (peace and blessings be upon him). Then some other people came and said: "We have come to greet the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) with salam, to gain understanding of the religion, and to ask about the beginning of this universe." So he (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Allah Almighty existed (from eternity) and there was nothing other than Him. His Throne was upon the water, He wrote everything in the Record (the Preserved Tablet), then He created the seven heavens." The narrator said: Meanwhile a man came to him (peace and blessings be upon him) and said: "Your she-camel has gone off." Then he (peace and blessings be upon him) (left from there and afterwards) said: "I wished that I had let it be."
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) حديث صحيح لكن من حديث عمران بن حُصين، فقد اختُلف فيه على المسعودي -وهو عبد الرحمن بن عبد الله بن عتبة- حيث رواه عنه روح بن عبادة هنا عند المصنف وابن خزيمة في "التوحيد" 2/ 884، وأبو داود الطيالسي وعثمان بن عمر بن فارس عند الطحاوي في "مشكل الآثار" (5631) و (5632)، والنضر بن شميل عند الطبري في "تفسيره" 4/ 12، ويزيد بن هارون عند أبي الشيخ في "العظمة" (208)، فجعلوه من حديث بريدة بن الحصيب الأسلمي، وخالفهم خالد بن الحارث عند النسائي (11176) فجعله من حديث صفوان بن محرز عن ابن حُصين، وهو عمران بن الحصين، وهو المحفوظ.
Grading: This hadith is sahih, but as the hadith of 'Imran bin Husayn.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): There is a disagreement over al-Mas'udi ('Abd al-Rahman bin 'Abd Allah bin 'Utbah) in it. Rawh bin 'Ubadah narrated it from him here with the author (al-Hakim) and with Ibn Khuzaymah in "al-Tawhid" (2/ 884); Abu Dawud al-Tayalisi and 'Uthman bin 'Umar bin Faris in al-Tahawi's "Mushkil al-Athar" (5631 and 5632); al-Nadr bin Shumayl in al-Tabari's "Tafsir" (4/ 12); and Yazid bin Harun in Abu al-Shaykh's "al-'Azamah" (208); and they made it the hadith of "Buraydah bin al-Husayb al-Aslami". But Khalid bin al-Harith differed from them in al-Nasa'i (11176) and made it the hadith of "Safwan bin Muhriz from Ibn Husayn" (that is, 'Imran bin al-Husayn), and this is the "mahfuz" (preserved) version.
والمسعودي كان قد اختلط، وقد خالفه سفيان الثوري عند أحمد 33/ (19822)، والبخاري (3190)، والترمذي (3915)، وابن حبان (7292)، والأعمش عند أحمد (19876)، والبخاري (3191)، وابن حبان (6140)، فروياه عن جامع بن شداد، عن صفوان بن محرز، عن عمران بن حصين - وهو عند بعضهم مختصر.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): And al-Mas'udi had become confused in his memory (ikhtilat).
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Sufyan al-Thawri (Ahmad 33/ 19822, al-Bukhari 3190, al-Tirmidhi 3915, Ibn Hibban 7292) and al-A'mash (Ahmad 19876, al-Bukhari 3191, Ibn Hibban 6140) differed from him; both of them narrated it as "Jami' bin Shaddad from Safwan bin Muhriz from 'Imran bin Husayn", and with some of them it is abridged.
Grading: This hadith is sahih, but as the hadith of 'Imran bin Husayn.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): There is a disagreement over al-Mas'udi ('Abd al-Rahman bin 'Abd Allah bin 'Utbah) in it. Rawh bin 'Ubadah narrated it from him here with the author (al-Hakim) and with Ibn Khuzaymah in "al-Tawhid" (2/ 884); Abu Dawud al-Tayalisi and 'Uthman bin 'Umar bin Faris in al-Tahawi's "Mushkil al-Athar" (5631 and 5632); al-Nadr bin Shumayl in al-Tabari's "Tafsir" (4/ 12); and Yazid bin Harun in Abu al-Shaykh's "al-'Azamah" (208); and they made it the hadith of "Buraydah bin al-Husayb al-Aslami". But Khalid bin al-Harith differed from them in al-Nasa'i (11176) and made it the hadith of "Safwan bin Muhriz from Ibn Husayn" (that is, 'Imran bin al-Husayn), and this is the "mahfuz" (preserved) version.
والمسعودي كان قد اختلط، وقد خالفه سفيان الثوري عند أحمد 33/ (19822)، والبخاري (3190)، والترمذي (3915)، وابن حبان (7292)، والأعمش عند أحمد (19876)، والبخاري (3191)، وابن حبان (6140)، فروياه عن جامع بن شداد، عن صفوان بن محرز، عن عمران بن حصين - وهو عند بعضهم مختصر.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): And al-Mas'udi had become confused in his memory (ikhtilat).
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Sufyan al-Thawri (Ahmad 33/ 19822, al-Bukhari 3190, al-Tirmidhi 3915, Ibn Hibban 7292) and al-A'mash (Ahmad 19876, al-Bukhari 3191, Ibn Hibban 6140) differed from him; both of them narrated it as "Jami' bin Shaddad from Safwan bin Muhriz from 'Imran bin Husayn", and with some of them it is abridged.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 3346
