Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب التفسير
Book of Tafsir
تَفْسِيرُ سُورَةِ التَّوْبَةِ - لِمَ لَمْ تُكْتَبْ فِي بَرَاءَةَ: بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ؟
Tafsir of Surah al-Tawbah: why "In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful" was not written in Bara'ah
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 3312
اُردوEn
فحدَّثَناه أبو بكر محمد بن عبد الله الحَفيد، حدثنا محمد بن زكريا بن دينار، حدثنا يعقوب بن جعفر بن سليمان الهاشمي، حدثني أَبي، عن أبيه، عن علي بن عبد الله بن عبَّاس قال: سمعت أَبي يقول: سألتُ عليَّ بن أبي طالب: لِمَ لَمْ يُكتَبْ في براءةَ: بسم الله الرَّحمن الرَّحيم؟ قال: لأنَّ "بسم الله الرَّحمن الرَّحيم" أمانٌ، وبراءةُ أُنزِلَت بالسَّيف ليس فيها أمانٌ (2).
Ali bin Abdullah bin Abbas narrates from his father that he asked Sayyiduna Ali bin Abi Talib (may Allah be pleased with him): "Why was 'Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim' not written at the beginning of Surah Bara'ah?" He replied: "Because 'Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim' is (a declaration of) safety and security, whereas Surah Bara'ah was revealed with the sword (the command and declaration of war), and in it there is no safety (for the polytheists)."
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) إسناده واهٍ، آفته محمد بن زكريا بن دينار، واتَّهمه الدارقطني بالوضع، وقال الحافظ ابن حجر في "إتحاف المهرة" (14530): إسناده ضعيف جدًا، ومحمد بن زكريا: هو الغَلّابي، وهو متروك.
Grading: Its isnad is extremely weak (wahin).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Its fault lies with Muhammad bin Zakariyya bin Dinar, whom al-Daraqutni accused of fabrication. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in "Ithaf al-Maharah" (14530): Its isnad is very weak, and Muhammad bin Zakariyya is al-Ghallabi, and he is matruk (abandoned).
وأخرجه ابن الأعرابي في "معجمه" (567) عن محمد بن زكريا، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Ibn al-A'rabi recorded it in his "Mu'jam" (567) from Muhammad bin Zakariyya, with this same isnad.
Grading: Its isnad is extremely weak (wahin).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Its fault lies with Muhammad bin Zakariyya bin Dinar, whom al-Daraqutni accused of fabrication. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in "Ithaf al-Maharah" (14530): Its isnad is very weak, and Muhammad bin Zakariyya is al-Ghallabi, and he is matruk (abandoned).
وأخرجه ابن الأعرابي في "معجمه" (567) عن محمد بن زكريا، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Ibn al-A'rabi recorded it in his "Mu'jam" (567) from Muhammad bin Zakariyya, with this same isnad.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 3312
