Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب التفسير
Book of Tafsir
خَلَقَ اللَّهُ أَرْبَعَةَ أَشْيَاءَ بِيَدِهِ
Allah created four things with His Hand
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 3284
اُردوEn
أخبرني عبد الصمد بن علي البزَّاز ببغداد، حدثنا أحمد بن محمد بن عبد الحميد الجُعْفي، حدثنا عبد العزيز بن أَبان، حدثنا سفيان الثَّوْري، عن عمرو ابن قيس المُلَائي، عن المِنهال بن عمرو، عن سعيد بن جُبير، عن ابن عبَّاس قال: كان لباسُ آدمَ وحوَّاءَ مثل الظُّفر، فلما ذاقا الشجرةَ جعلا يَخصِفانِ عليهما من وَرَق الجنة، قال: ورقُ التِّين (2).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 3245 - صحيح
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 3245 - صحيح
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) that he said: The clothing of Sayyiduna Adam and Sayyidah Hawwa (peace be upon them both) was like fingernails (smooth and shining). Then when they tasted (the fruit of) the tree, they began to fasten leaves of Paradise over themselves. He said: (Those leaves) were of the fig tree.
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) إسناده ضعيف جدًا من أجل عبد العزيز بن أبان فإنه متروك، واتهمه بعضهم بالكذب، لكن لم ينفرد به عن سفيان، فقد تابعه عليه معاوية بن هشام -وهو صدوق- عند البيهقي في "السنن الكبرى" 2/ 244 فرواه عن سفيان الثوري إلّا أنه قال فيه: أظنه عن عمرو بن قيس الملائي، وساق إسناده إلى ابن عبَّاس. فذكره على الشك.
Grading: Its chain is very weak on account of Abd al-Aziz bin Aban, for he is matruk (abandoned), and some accused him of lying.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: But he is not alone in narrating it from Sufyan, for Mu'awiyah bin Hisham (who is saduq, truthful) corroborated him in it with al-Bayhaqi in "al-Sunan al-Kubra" (2/ 244): he narrated it from Sufyan al-Thawri, except that he said in it: "I think it is from Amr bin Qays al-Mula'i," and he gave its chain up to Ibn Abbas. So he mentioned it with doubt.
وأخرجه ابن أبي حاتم في "تفسيره" 5/ 1459، وأبو الشيخ في "العظمة" (1047) من طريق أبي يحيى الحِمّاني، عن النضر، عن عكرمة، عن ابن عبَّاس. وهذا إسناد ضعيف جدًا، النضر -وهو ابن عبد الرحمن الخزّاز- متروك.
Reference / Source: Ibn Abi Hatim recorded it in his "Tafsir" (5/ 1459), and Abu al-Shaykh in "al-'Azamah" (1047), by way of Abu Yahya al-Himmani, from al-Nadr, from Ikrimah, from Ibn Abbas.
Grading: This chain is very weak; al-Nadr (Ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Khazzaz) is matruk (abandoned).
Grading: Its chain is very weak on account of Abd al-Aziz bin Aban, for he is matruk (abandoned), and some accused him of lying.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: But he is not alone in narrating it from Sufyan, for Mu'awiyah bin Hisham (who is saduq, truthful) corroborated him in it with al-Bayhaqi in "al-Sunan al-Kubra" (2/ 244): he narrated it from Sufyan al-Thawri, except that he said in it: "I think it is from Amr bin Qays al-Mula'i," and he gave its chain up to Ibn Abbas. So he mentioned it with doubt.
وأخرجه ابن أبي حاتم في "تفسيره" 5/ 1459، وأبو الشيخ في "العظمة" (1047) من طريق أبي يحيى الحِمّاني، عن النضر، عن عكرمة، عن ابن عبَّاس. وهذا إسناد ضعيف جدًا، النضر -وهو ابن عبد الرحمن الخزّاز- متروك.
Reference / Source: Ibn Abi Hatim recorded it in his "Tafsir" (5/ 1459), and Abu al-Shaykh in "al-'Azamah" (1047), by way of Abu Yahya al-Himmani, from al-Nadr, from Ikrimah, from Ibn Abbas.
Grading: This chain is very weak; al-Nadr (Ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Khazzaz) is matruk (abandoned).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 3284
