Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب الفتن والملاحم
Book of Trials and Great Battles
ذِكْرُ الْفِتَنِ السَّبْعِ الَّتِي حَذَّرَ مِنْهَا النَّبِيُّ
The seven tribulations which the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) warned against
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 8653
اُردوEn
أخبرني محمد بن المؤمَّل بن الحسن، حدثنا الفضل بن محمد بن المسيَّب، حدثنا نُعيم بن حمّاد، حدثنا يحيى بن سعيد، حدثنا الوليد بن عيّاش أخو أبي بكر بن عيّاش، عن إبراهيم، عن عَلقمة قال: قال ابن مسعود: قال لنا رسول الله ﷺ: "أحذِّرُكم سبع فتنٍ تكون بعدي: فتنةً تُقبِلُ من المدينة، وفتنةً بمكَّة، وفتنةً تُقبل من اليمن، وفتنةً تُقبل من الشام، وفتنةً تُقبل من المشرق، وفتنةً تُقبل من المغرب، وفتنةً من بطن الشام؛ وهي السُّفْياني". قال: فقال ابن مسعود: منكم مَن يُدرِك أولها، ومن هذه الأمَّة من يُدرِك آخرَها. قال الوليد بن عيَّاش: فكانت فتنةُ المدينة من قبل طلحة والزُّبير، وفتنةُ مكة فتنةُ عبد الله بن الزبير، وفتنةُ الشام من قِبَل بني أُميَّة، وفتنةُ المشرقِ من قِبَل هؤلاء (1).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 8447 - هذا من أبوابد نعيم بن مهدي
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 8447 - هذا من أبوابد نعيم بن مهدي
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said to us: "I warn you of seven trials that will occur after me: a trial that will arise from Madinah, a trial in Makkah, a trial that will come from Yemen, a trial that will come from Sham, a trial that will come from the east, a trial that will come from the west, and a trial that will arise from the heart of Sham, and that is the trial of the Sufyani." Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Among you will be those who will witness the beginning of these trials, and among this Ummah will be those who will witness their end." Al-Walid bin Ayyash (the narrator) said: The trial of Madinah was from the side of Talhah and al-Zubayr, the trial of Makkah was the trial of Abdullah bin al-Zubayr, the trial of Sham was from the side of Banu Umayyah, and the trial of the east was from the side of these people.
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) حديث واهٍ، وهو من أوابد نُعيم كما قال الذهبي في "التلخيص". يحيى بن سعيد: هو العطار، وهو ضعيف، وشيخه الوليد بن عياش لم نقف له على ترجمة فنتبيَّن حاله، إبراهيم: هو ابن يزيد النخعي، وعلقمة: هو ابن قيس النخعي.
Grading: This hadith is "wahin" (extremely weak), and it is among the "awabid" (strange, odd reports) of Nu'aym, as al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Yahya bin Sa'id is "al-'Attar", who is weak, and we did not find any biography for his shaykh "al-Walid bin 'Ayyash" so that his condition could be known. Ibrahim is "Ibrahim bin Yazid al-Nakha'i" and 'Alqamah is "Ibn Qays al-Nakha'i".
وإسناد المصنف فيه وهمٌ ممَّن دون نعيم بن حماد، فالحديث في كتابه "الفتن" (87) عن يحيى بن سعيد العطار قال: حدثنا حجاج، رجلٌ منّا، عن الوليد بن عياش قال: قال عبد الله بن مسعود … فذكره. فبان بذلك علّته، فحجّاج هذا لا يعرف كالوليد بن عياش، وبين الوليد وابن مسعود إعضال، فالسند ساقط.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): In the author's chain there is a "wahm" (error) from the narrators below Nu'aym bin Hammad. For this hadith is narrated in Nu'aym's own book "al-Fitan" (87) from Yahya bin Sa'id al-'Attar thus: "Hajjaj (a man from among us) narrated to us, from al-Walid bin 'Ayyash …". This makes the defect clear, because this Hajjaj is also unknown like al-Walid bin 'Ayyash, and between al-Walid and Ibn Mas'ud there is "i'dal" (a severe break of two or more narrators); so this chain is "saqit" (worthless).
Grading: This hadith is "wahin" (extremely weak), and it is among the "awabid" (strange, odd reports) of Nu'aym, as al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Yahya bin Sa'id is "al-'Attar", who is weak, and we did not find any biography for his shaykh "al-Walid bin 'Ayyash" so that his condition could be known. Ibrahim is "Ibrahim bin Yazid al-Nakha'i" and 'Alqamah is "Ibn Qays al-Nakha'i".
وإسناد المصنف فيه وهمٌ ممَّن دون نعيم بن حماد، فالحديث في كتابه "الفتن" (87) عن يحيى بن سعيد العطار قال: حدثنا حجاج، رجلٌ منّا، عن الوليد بن عياش قال: قال عبد الله بن مسعود … فذكره. فبان بذلك علّته، فحجّاج هذا لا يعرف كالوليد بن عياش، وبين الوليد وابن مسعود إعضال، فالسند ساقط.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): In the author's chain there is a "wahm" (error) from the narrators below Nu'aym bin Hammad. For this hadith is narrated in Nu'aym's own book "al-Fitan" (87) from Yahya bin Sa'id al-'Attar thus: "Hajjaj (a man from among us) narrated to us, from al-Walid bin 'Ayyash …". This makes the defect clear, because this Hajjaj is also unknown like al-Walid bin 'Ayyash, and between al-Walid and Ibn Mas'ud there is "i'dal" (a severe break of two or more narrators); so this chain is "saqit" (worthless).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 8653
