Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب الرقاق
Book of Heart-Softening Narrations
ذِكْرُ ذَمَائِمِ الْعِبَادِ
Mention of the blameworthy traits of servants
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 8083
اُردوEn
حدثنا علي بن بُنْدار الزاهد، حدثني أبو بكر محمد بن سليمان بن يوسف السَّلِيطي، حدثنا علي بن سعيد النَّسَوي، حدثنا عبد الصمد بن عبد الوارث، حدثنا هاشم بن سعيد الكوفي، حدثنا زيد بن عبد الله الخَثعَمي، عن أسماء بنت عُميس الخَثْعمية قالت: سمعتُ رسول الله ﷺ يقول: "بئسَ العبدُ عبدٌ تخيَّلَ واختال، ونَسِيَ الكبيرَ المُتعال، بئسَ العبدُ عبدٌ سَهَا ولَهَا، ونَسِيَ المَبدأَ والمُنتهى، بئسَ العبدُ عبدٌ بَغَى وعَتَا، ونَسِيَ المقابرَ والبِلَا، بئسَ العبدُ عبدٌ يَخيِلُ الدنيا بالدِّين، بئسَ العبدُ عبدٌ يَختِلُ الدِّينَ بالشُّبُهات، بئس العبدُ عبدٌ يَصُدُّه الرُّعبُ عن الحقّ، بئسَ العبدُ عبدٌ طَمَعُ يقودُه، بئس العبدُ عبدٌ هوًى يُضِلُّه" (1).
هذا حديث (2) ليس في إسناده أحدٌ منسوبٌ إلى نوع من الجَرْح، وإذا كانوا هكذا فإنه صحيح، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7885 - إسناده مظلم
هذا حديث (2) ليس في إسناده أحدٌ منسوبٌ إلى نوع من الجَرْح، وإذا كانوا هكذا فإنه صحيح، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7885 - إسناده مظلم
It is narrated from Sayyidah Asma bint Umays al-Khath'amiyyah (may Allah be pleased with her) that she said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) saying: "Wretched is the servant who is lost in fancies and behaves arrogantly, and forgets the Great, the Most High. Wretched is the servant who is heedless and absorbed in amusement, and forgets his beginning and his end. Wretched is the servant who transgresses and rebels, and forgets the graves and (the body's) decay. Wretched is the servant who trades his religion for the world. Wretched is the servant who deceives the religion through doubtful matters. Wretched is the servant whom (unjust) awe and fear turn away from the truth. Wretched is the servant whose reins are in the hands of his greed. And wretched is the servant whose desire leads him astray."
None of the narrators in the chain of this hadith is attributed with any criticism, and when the narrators are like this, the hadith is sahih (authentic), but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
None of the narrators in the chain of this hadith is attributed with any criticism, and when the narrators are like this, the hadith is sahih (authentic), but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) إسناده ضعيف بمرّة، هاشم بن سعيد الكوفي ضعيف، وزيد بن عبد الله الخثعمي - كذا سمى المصنِّف أباه، والذي في "تهذيب الكمال": ابن عطية - مجهول، لم يرو عنه سوى هاشم بن سعيد، ومحمد بن سليمان بن يوسف السليطي لا يُعرف حاله، إلَّا أنه متابع، وقال الذهبي في "التلخيص": إسناده مظلم.
Grading: Its chain is utterly weak.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Hashim bin Sa'id al-Kufi is weak; and Zayd bin Abdullah al-Khath'ami (this is how the author named his father, whereas in "Tahdhib al-Kamal" he is Ibn 'Atiyyah) is majhul (unknown), no one narrated from him except Hashim bin Sa'id. Also the status of Muhammad bin Sulayman bin Yusuf al-Sulayti is not known, except that he is corroborated. Imam al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis": "Its chain is dark (muzlim)."
وأخرجه الترمذي (2448) عن محمد بن يحيى الأزدي، عن عبد الصمد بن عبد الوارث بهذا الإسناد. وزاد فيه: "بئس العبد عبد تجبّر واعتدى، ونسي الجبار "الأعلى. وقال: هذا حديث غريب لا نعرفه إلَّا من هذا الوجه، وليس إسناده بالقوي.
Reference / Source: Al-Tirmidhi (2448) recorded it from Muhammad bin Yahya al-Azdi, from Abd al-Samad bin Abd al-Warith, with this same chain.
Details of the narration: He added in it: "Wretched is the servant who acts tyrannically and transgresses, and forgets the Most High, the Compeller (Allah)." Al-Tirmidhi said: "This hadith is gharib; we know it only from this route, and its chain is not strong."
وروى نحوه من حديث نعيم بن همّار الغطفاني: ابن عدي في "الكامل" 4/ 110، وابن أبي عاصم في "السنة" (9) مختصرًا، والبيهقي في "الشعب" (7833) ولم يسق لفظه بتمامه. وفي سنده طلحة بن زيد الرقي، وهو متهم، فلا يُفرح به. وأورده ابن أبي حاتم في "العلل" (1838)، ونقل عن أبيه قال: حديث منكر، وطلحة ضعيف الحديث، ويزيد - وهو ابن شريح - لم يدرك نعيم بن همار.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Something similar was narrated from the hadith of Nu'aym bin Hammar al-Ghatafani by Ibn 'Adi in "al-Kamil" (4/ 110), Ibn Abi 'Asim in "al-Sunnah" (9) in abridged form, and al-Bayhaqi in "al-Shu'ab" (7833) (but al-Bayhaqi did not give its full wording).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): In its chain is Talhah bin Zayd al-Raqqi, who is accused (muttaham), so it is of no avail (i.e. it cannot be relied upon). Ibn Abi Hatim mentioned it in "al-'Ilal" (1838) and quoted his father (Abu Hatim) as saying: "This hadith is munkar; Talhah is weak in hadith, and Yazid (who is Ibn Shurayh) did not live in the time of Nu'aym bin Hammar (so there is a break)."
(2) زاد في (ز) و (م): صحيح، وليست في (ك) و (ب).
Note / Clarification: Manuscripts (Z) and (M) add the word "sahih", whereas it is not in manuscripts (K) and (B).
Grading: Its chain is utterly weak.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Hashim bin Sa'id al-Kufi is weak; and Zayd bin Abdullah al-Khath'ami (this is how the author named his father, whereas in "Tahdhib al-Kamal" he is Ibn 'Atiyyah) is majhul (unknown), no one narrated from him except Hashim bin Sa'id. Also the status of Muhammad bin Sulayman bin Yusuf al-Sulayti is not known, except that he is corroborated. Imam al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis": "Its chain is dark (muzlim)."
وأخرجه الترمذي (2448) عن محمد بن يحيى الأزدي، عن عبد الصمد بن عبد الوارث بهذا الإسناد. وزاد فيه: "بئس العبد عبد تجبّر واعتدى، ونسي الجبار "الأعلى. وقال: هذا حديث غريب لا نعرفه إلَّا من هذا الوجه، وليس إسناده بالقوي.
Reference / Source: Al-Tirmidhi (2448) recorded it from Muhammad bin Yahya al-Azdi, from Abd al-Samad bin Abd al-Warith, with this same chain.
Details of the narration: He added in it: "Wretched is the servant who acts tyrannically and transgresses, and forgets the Most High, the Compeller (Allah)." Al-Tirmidhi said: "This hadith is gharib; we know it only from this route, and its chain is not strong."
وروى نحوه من حديث نعيم بن همّار الغطفاني: ابن عدي في "الكامل" 4/ 110، وابن أبي عاصم في "السنة" (9) مختصرًا، والبيهقي في "الشعب" (7833) ولم يسق لفظه بتمامه. وفي سنده طلحة بن زيد الرقي، وهو متهم، فلا يُفرح به. وأورده ابن أبي حاتم في "العلل" (1838)، ونقل عن أبيه قال: حديث منكر، وطلحة ضعيف الحديث، ويزيد - وهو ابن شريح - لم يدرك نعيم بن همار.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Something similar was narrated from the hadith of Nu'aym bin Hammar al-Ghatafani by Ibn 'Adi in "al-Kamil" (4/ 110), Ibn Abi 'Asim in "al-Sunnah" (9) in abridged form, and al-Bayhaqi in "al-Shu'ab" (7833) (but al-Bayhaqi did not give its full wording).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): In its chain is Talhah bin Zayd al-Raqqi, who is accused (muttaham), so it is of no avail (i.e. it cannot be relied upon). Ibn Abi Hatim mentioned it in "al-'Ilal" (1838) and quoted his father (Abu Hatim) as saying: "This hadith is munkar; Talhah is weak in hadith, and Yazid (who is Ibn Shurayh) did not live in the time of Nu'aym bin Hammar (so there is a break)."
(2) زاد في (ز) و (م): صحيح، وليست في (ك) و (ب).
Note / Clarification: Manuscripts (Z) and (M) add the word "sahih", whereas it is not in manuscripts (K) and (B).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 8083
