Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب الإيمان
Book of Faith
تَفْسِيرُ آيَةِ ( وَإِذْ أَخَذَ رَبُّكَ مِنْ بَنِي آدَمَ مِنْ ظُهُورِهِمْ ذُرِّيَّتَهُمْ )
Tafsir of the verse: And when your Lord took from the children of Adam, from their loins, their descendants
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 76
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو بكر بن إسحاق الفقيه، أخبرنا بِشْر بن موسى، حدثنا سعيد بن منصور، حدثنا خَلَف بن خَليفة، عن حُميد الأعرج، عن عبد الله بن الحارث، عن ابن مسعود، عن النبي ﷺ قال: "يومَ كَلَّمَ اللهُ موسى كان عليه جُبَّةُ صوفٍ، وسراويلُ صوفٍ، وكُمَّةُ صوفٍ، وكِساءُ صوفٍ، ونَعلانِ من جلدِ حمارٍ غيرِ ذكيٍّ" (1). قد اتفقا جميعًا على الاحتجاج بحديث سعيد بن منصور، وحُميدٌ هذا ليس بابن قيس الأعرج، قال البخاري في "التاريخ": حميد بن علي الأعرج الكوفي مُنكَر الحديث، وعبد الله بن الحارث النَّجْراني مُحتَجٌّ به (2)، واحتجَّ مسلم وحده بخلف بن خليفة، و
هذا حديث كبير في التصوف والتكليم (3)، ولم يُخرجاه. وله شاهد من حديث إسماعيل بن عيَّاش:
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 76 - حميد هذا ليس بابن قيس
هذا حديث كبير في التصوف والتكليم (3)، ولم يُخرجاه. وله شاهد من حديث إسماعيل بن عيَّاش:
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 76 - حميد هذا ليس بابن قيس
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "On the day Allah Almighty spoke to Musa (peace be upon him), he was wearing a woollen cloak, woollen trousers, a woollen cap and a woollen wrap, and his sandals were of the hide of a donkey that had not been ritually slaughtered."
Imam Bukhari and Muslim both agreed on using the hadith of Sa'id bin Mansur as evidence. The narrator named Humayd here is not Humayd bin Qays al-A'raj; rather, Imam Bukhari said in "al-Tarikh" that Humayd bin Ali al-A'raj al-Kufi is munkar al-hadith (a narrator of denounced hadith), while Abdullah bin al-Harith al-Najrani is used as evidence, and Imam Muslim alone used Khalaf bin Khalifah as evidence. This is an important hadith on the subject of tasawwuf and of Allah speaking, but the two of them did not record it. It also has a supporting narration (shahid) from the hadith of Isma'il bin Ayyash.
Imam Bukhari and Muslim both agreed on using the hadith of Sa'id bin Mansur as evidence. The narrator named Humayd here is not Humayd bin Qays al-A'raj; rather, Imam Bukhari said in "al-Tarikh" that Humayd bin Ali al-A'raj al-Kufi is munkar al-hadith (a narrator of denounced hadith), while Abdullah bin al-Harith al-Najrani is used as evidence, and Imam Muslim alone used Khalaf bin Khalifah as evidence. This is an important hadith on the subject of tasawwuf and of Allah speaking, but the two of them did not record it. It also has a supporting narration (shahid) from the hadith of Isma'il bin Ayyash.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) إسناده ضعيف جدًّا، حميد الأعرج متروك الحديث، والعجب من الحاكم كيف أخرجه مع أنه نقل لاحقًا عن البخاري أنه قال فيه: منكر الحديث. وسيأتي هذا الخبر عند الحاكم برقم (3472) مخرَّجًا من طريق عمر بن حفص بن غياث عن أبيه وخلف بن خليفة ووقع حميد هناك مسمًّى بحميد بن قيس، فذَهَلَ وصحَّحه على شرط البخاري، مع أنه نصَّ هنا أنه ليس بابن قيس وهو الصواب، وما وقع هناك فوهمٌ من أحد رواة الإسناد.
Grading: Its chain is "very weak".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Humayd al-A'raj is a "matruk al-hadith" (abandoned) narrator. It is surprising how Imam al-Hakim recorded it, when he himself later quotes Imam al-Bukhari as saying that he is "munkar al-hadith". This same narration will come with al-Hakim at number (3472) by way of Umar bin Hafs, where Humayd is mistakenly named "Humayd bin Qays", and there Imam al-Hakim, through an oversight (dhuhul), called it sahih according to al-Bukhari's criteria, although here he himself stated that he is not Ibn Qays (and this is correct). Where "Ibn Qays" is written there, it is a mistake by one of the narrators.
وأما عبد الله بن الحارث فليس له سماع من ابن مسعود فيما قاله ابن المديني وابن معين وغيرهما.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Abd Allah bin al-Harith did not hear from Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him), as stated explicitly by Imam Ali bin al-Madini, Yahya bin Ma'in and others.
وأخرجه الترمذي (1734) عن علي بن حُجْر، عن خلف بن خليفة بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Imam al-Tirmidhi narrated it at (1734) by way of Ali bin Hujr, from Khalaf bin Khalifah, with this chain.
والكُمَّة: القَلَنسُوَة الصغيرة. قاله الترمذي.
Note / Clarification: According to Imam al-Tirmidhi, "kummah" means a small cap (qalansuwah).
(2) عند مسلم وحده.
Reference / Source: This narration is found with Imam Muslim only.
(3) في المطبوع: والتكلم.
Note / Clarification: The printed edition has the words "wa al-takallum" here.
Grading: Its chain is "very weak".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Humayd al-A'raj is a "matruk al-hadith" (abandoned) narrator. It is surprising how Imam al-Hakim recorded it, when he himself later quotes Imam al-Bukhari as saying that he is "munkar al-hadith". This same narration will come with al-Hakim at number (3472) by way of Umar bin Hafs, where Humayd is mistakenly named "Humayd bin Qays", and there Imam al-Hakim, through an oversight (dhuhul), called it sahih according to al-Bukhari's criteria, although here he himself stated that he is not Ibn Qays (and this is correct). Where "Ibn Qays" is written there, it is a mistake by one of the narrators.
وأما عبد الله بن الحارث فليس له سماع من ابن مسعود فيما قاله ابن المديني وابن معين وغيرهما.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Abd Allah bin al-Harith did not hear from Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him), as stated explicitly by Imam Ali bin al-Madini, Yahya bin Ma'in and others.
وأخرجه الترمذي (1734) عن علي بن حُجْر، عن خلف بن خليفة بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Imam al-Tirmidhi narrated it at (1734) by way of Ali bin Hujr, from Khalaf bin Khalifah, with this chain.
والكُمَّة: القَلَنسُوَة الصغيرة. قاله الترمذي.
Note / Clarification: According to Imam al-Tirmidhi, "kummah" means a small cap (qalansuwah).
(2) عند مسلم وحده.
Reference / Source: This narration is found with Imam Muslim only.
(3) في المطبوع: والتكلم.
Note / Clarification: The printed edition has the words "wa al-takallum" here.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 76
