Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
حلية المقداد بن عمرو
The appearance of al-Miqdad bin Amr (may Allah be pleased with him)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5577
اُردوEn
أخبرنا أبو العباس محمد بن أحمد المَحبُوبي بمَرُو، حَدَّثَنَا سعيد بن مسعود، حَدَّثَنَا عُبيد الله بن موسى، أخبرنا إسرائيل، عن مُخارقٍ، عن طارِقٍ، عن عبد الله، قال: شَهِدتُ من المقداد مشهدًا لأن أكونَ صاحِبَه أَحبُّ إليَّ مما عُدِلَ؛ أنه أتى النَّبِيّ ﷺ وهو يدعُو على المشركين، فقال: إنا واللهِ يا رسولَ الله لا نقولُ كما قال قومُ موسى لموسى: ﴿اذْهَبْ أَنْتَ وَرَبُّكَ فَقَاتِلَا إِنَّا هَاهُنَا قَاعِدُونَ﴾ [المائدة: 24] ولكنا نقاتلُ عن يَمينِك وعن شِمالِك، ومن بين يَدَيك ومن خَلْفِك، فرأيتُ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ يُشرِقُ لذلك، وسَرَّهُ ذلك (2).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه!
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5486 - صحيح
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه!
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5486 - صحيح
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him) that he said: I witnessed a deed of al-Miqdad (may Allah be pleased with him) such that had I been its doer, it would have been dearer to me than anything that could be weighed against it. He came to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) while he was supplicating against the polytheists. Al-Miqdad (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "By Allah, O Messenger of Allah! We will not say to you what the people of Musa (peace be upon him) said to him: 'Go, you and your Lord, and fight; we are sitting right here.' [Surah al-Ma'idah: 24] Rather, we will fight (against the enemies) on your right, on your left, in front of you and behind you." Abdullah said: I saw the blessed face of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) light up at this, and it greatly pleased him.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it!
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it!
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) إسناده صحيح. إسرائيل: هو ابن يونس بن أبي إسحاق السَّبيعي، ومُخارق: هو ابن خليفة - ويقال: ابن عبد الله بن جابر، ويقال: ابن عبد الرحمن - الأحمسي، وطارق: هو ابن شهاب الأحمسي، وعبد الله: هو ابن مسعود.
Grading: (2) Its chain is "sahih".
Important point: Isra'il: he is Ibn Yunus bin Abi Ishaq al-Sabi'i; Mukhariq: he is Ibn Khalifah al-Ahmasi (also said to be Ibn Abd Allah bin Jabir, or Ibn Abd al-Rahman); Tariq: he is Ibn Shihab al-Ahmasi; and Abd Allah: he is Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him).
وأخرجه أحمد 6/ (3698) و 7 / (4070)، والبخاري (3952) و (4609) من طرق عن إسرائيل، بهذا الإسناد. فاستدراك الحاكم له ذهولٌ منه.
Reference / Source: It was recorded by Ahmad [6/ (3698) and 7/ (4070)] and al-Bukhari (3952 and 4609) through several routes from Isra'il, with this chain.
Note / Clarification: So al-Hakim's including it (in al-Mustadrak) is an oversight on his part, since it is already in al-Bukhari.
وأخرجه أحمد 7/ (4376) عن عَبيدة بن حُميد، والبخاري (4609)، والنسائي (11075) من طريق عُبيد الله الأشجعي، عن سفيان الثوري، كلاهما عَبيدة وسفيان عن مخارق الأحمسي، به.
Reference / Source: It was recorded by Ahmad [7/ (4376)] from 'Abidah bin Humayd, and by al-Bukhari (4609) and al-Nasa'i (11075) through the route of 'Ubayd Allah al-Ashja'i, from Sufyan al-Thawri; both of them, 'Abidah and Sufyan, from Mukhariq al-Ahmasi.
وأخرجه أحمد 31/ (18827) عن وكيع، عن سفيان الثوري، عن مخارق، عن طارق مرسلًا.
Reference / Source: It was recorded by Ahmad [31/ (18827)] from Waki', from Sufyan al-Thawri, from Mukhariq, from Tariq, in mursal form.
والمحفوظ رواية الأشجعي عن سفيان الثوري، لأنّها توافق رواية غير سفيان الثوري ممَّن وصل الحديثَ، ولهذا قال الدارقطني في "العلل" (3420): حديث الأشجعي أصح.
General principle: What is "mahfuz" (preserved) is the narration of al-Ashja'i from Sufyan al-Thawri, because it agrees with the narration of those other than Sufyan al-Thawri who narrated the hadith in connected form. That is why al-Daraqutni said in "al-'Ilal" (3420): The hadith of al-Ashja'i is more correct.
Grading: (2) Its chain is "sahih".
Important point: Isra'il: he is Ibn Yunus bin Abi Ishaq al-Sabi'i; Mukhariq: he is Ibn Khalifah al-Ahmasi (also said to be Ibn Abd Allah bin Jabir, or Ibn Abd al-Rahman); Tariq: he is Ibn Shihab al-Ahmasi; and Abd Allah: he is Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him).
وأخرجه أحمد 6/ (3698) و 7 / (4070)، والبخاري (3952) و (4609) من طرق عن إسرائيل، بهذا الإسناد. فاستدراك الحاكم له ذهولٌ منه.
Reference / Source: It was recorded by Ahmad [6/ (3698) and 7/ (4070)] and al-Bukhari (3952 and 4609) through several routes from Isra'il, with this chain.
Note / Clarification: So al-Hakim's including it (in al-Mustadrak) is an oversight on his part, since it is already in al-Bukhari.
وأخرجه أحمد 7/ (4376) عن عَبيدة بن حُميد، والبخاري (4609)، والنسائي (11075) من طريق عُبيد الله الأشجعي، عن سفيان الثوري، كلاهما عَبيدة وسفيان عن مخارق الأحمسي، به.
Reference / Source: It was recorded by Ahmad [7/ (4376)] from 'Abidah bin Humayd, and by al-Bukhari (4609) and al-Nasa'i (11075) through the route of 'Ubayd Allah al-Ashja'i, from Sufyan al-Thawri; both of them, 'Abidah and Sufyan, from Mukhariq al-Ahmasi.
وأخرجه أحمد 31/ (18827) عن وكيع، عن سفيان الثوري، عن مخارق، عن طارق مرسلًا.
Reference / Source: It was recorded by Ahmad [31/ (18827)] from Waki', from Sufyan al-Thawri, from Mukhariq, from Tariq, in mursal form.
والمحفوظ رواية الأشجعي عن سفيان الثوري، لأنّها توافق رواية غير سفيان الثوري ممَّن وصل الحديثَ، ولهذا قال الدارقطني في "العلل" (3420): حديث الأشجعي أصح.
General principle: What is "mahfuz" (preserved) is the narration of al-Ashja'i from Sufyan al-Thawri, because it agrees with the narration of those other than Sufyan al-Thawri who narrated the hadith in connected form. That is why al-Daraqutni said in "al-'Ilal" (3420): The hadith of al-Ashja'i is more correct.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5577
