Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
مَنْ أَحَبَّ أَنْ يَقْرَأَ الْقُرْآنَ غَضًّا فَلْيَقْرَأْهُ عَلَى قِرَاءَةِ ابْنِ أُمِّ عَبْدٍ
Whoever would like to recite the Quran fresh as it was revealed should recite it according to the recitation of Ibn Umm Abd (may Allah be pleased with him)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5478
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو العباس محمد بن يعقوب، حدثنا أحمد بن عبد الجبار، حدثنا أبو معاوية، عن الأعمش، عن عمرو بن مُرّة، عن أبي البَخْتَري، عن علي؛ قال: قيل له: أخبرنا عن أصحاب محمد ﷺ، قال: عن أيِّهم؟ قال: أخبرنا عن عبد الله بن مسعود، قال: عَلِمَ الكتاب والسُّنَّة، ثم انتهى وكفى به؛ وذكر باقي الحديث (2). صحيح على شرط الشيخين، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5392 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5392 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
Sayyiduna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) was asked about the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him). He asked: About which of them? The people said: Tell us about Abdullah bin Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him). He said: "He learned the Book of Allah and the Sunnah, then he reached the utmost limit (of knowledge), and that is sufficient for his excellence." Then he mentioned the rest of the hadith.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) رجاله لا بأس بهم، لكن أبا البَخْتَري - واسمه سعيد بن فيروز - لم يُدرك عليًا، لكن روي نحوه عن عليٍّ من وجوه منها ما تقدَّم برقم (5465). أبو معاوية: هو محمد بن خازم الضرير، والأعمش: هو سليمان بن مهران.
Grading of the chain: (2) There is no harm in its men, but "Abu al-Bakhtari" (whose name is Sa'id bin Fayruz) did not live in the time of 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) (so it is munqati'). However, a similar narration is reported from 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) through other routes, one of which has passed at number (5465).
Technical note: Abu Mu'awiyah is "Muhammad bin Khazim al-Darir" and al-A'mash is "Sulayman bin Mihran".
وأخرجه ابن سعد 2/ 298، ويعقوب بن سفيان في "المعرفة والتاريخ" 2/ 540، وأبو نُعيم في "الحلية" 1/ 129، والبيهقي في "المُدخل في السنن الكبرى" (103)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 21/ 412 و 420 و 32/ 61 و 61 - 62 و 33/ 142 من طرق عن الأعمش، به. وفي بعض طرقه عن الأعمش أنَّ أبا البختري قال: أتينا عليًّا فسألناه، وظاهره يدل على إدراك أبي البختري لعلي بن أبي طالب، ولكن ذلك غير ثابت، ولو ثبت لما خفي على شعبة بن الحجاج وعلى من بعده كالبخاري وأبي حاتم الرازي، حيث جزموا بعدم إدراكه له.
Reference / Source: It was narrated by Ibn Sa'd (2/ 298), Ya'qub bin Sufyan in "al-Ma'rifah wa al-Tarikh" (2/ 540), Abu Nu'aym in "al-Hilyah" (1/ 129), al-Bayhaqi in "al-Madkhal" (103) and Ibn 'Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (21/ 412, 420, 32/ 61-62 and 33/ 142), through several routes from al-A'mash.
Technical note / Examination of direct hearing: In some routes from al-A'mash, Abu al-Bakhtari said: "We came to 'Ali and asked him." Outwardly this indicates that Abu al-Bakhtari met 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him), but this is not established. Had it been established, it would not have been hidden from Shu'bah bin al-Hajjaj and the hadith scholars after him such as al-Bukhari and Abu Hatim al-Razi, whereas they stated with certainty that Abu al-Bakhtari did not meet 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him).
وانظر ما سيأتي برقم (5731).
Details of the narration: For further detail, see what is coming at number (5731).
Grading of the chain: (2) There is no harm in its men, but "Abu al-Bakhtari" (whose name is Sa'id bin Fayruz) did not live in the time of 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) (so it is munqati'). However, a similar narration is reported from 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) through other routes, one of which has passed at number (5465).
Technical note: Abu Mu'awiyah is "Muhammad bin Khazim al-Darir" and al-A'mash is "Sulayman bin Mihran".
وأخرجه ابن سعد 2/ 298، ويعقوب بن سفيان في "المعرفة والتاريخ" 2/ 540، وأبو نُعيم في "الحلية" 1/ 129، والبيهقي في "المُدخل في السنن الكبرى" (103)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 21/ 412 و 420 و 32/ 61 و 61 - 62 و 33/ 142 من طرق عن الأعمش، به. وفي بعض طرقه عن الأعمش أنَّ أبا البختري قال: أتينا عليًّا فسألناه، وظاهره يدل على إدراك أبي البختري لعلي بن أبي طالب، ولكن ذلك غير ثابت، ولو ثبت لما خفي على شعبة بن الحجاج وعلى من بعده كالبخاري وأبي حاتم الرازي، حيث جزموا بعدم إدراكه له.
Reference / Source: It was narrated by Ibn Sa'd (2/ 298), Ya'qub bin Sufyan in "al-Ma'rifah wa al-Tarikh" (2/ 540), Abu Nu'aym in "al-Hilyah" (1/ 129), al-Bayhaqi in "al-Madkhal" (103) and Ibn 'Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (21/ 412, 420, 32/ 61-62 and 33/ 142), through several routes from al-A'mash.
Technical note / Examination of direct hearing: In some routes from al-A'mash, Abu al-Bakhtari said: "We came to 'Ali and asked him." Outwardly this indicates that Abu al-Bakhtari met 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him), but this is not established. Had it been established, it would not have been hidden from Shu'bah bin al-Hajjaj and the hadith scholars after him such as al-Bukhari and Abu Hatim al-Razi, whereas they stated with certainty that Abu al-Bakhtari did not meet 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him).
وانظر ما سيأتي برقم (5731).
Details of the narration: For further detail, see what is coming at number (5731).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5478
