Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
مَنْعُ النَّبِيِّ عَلِيًّا عَنْ نِكَاحِ بِنْتِ أَبِي جَهْلٍ .
The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) forbidding Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) to marry the daughter of Abu Jahl
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4804
اُردوEn
أخبرنا أحمد بن جعفر القطيعي، حدثنا عبد الله بن أحمد بن حنبل، حدثني أبي، حدثنا يحيى بن زكريا بن أبي زائدة، أخبرني أبي، عن الشعبي، عن سُوَيد بن غَفَلة، قال: خطب عليٌّ ابنة أبي جهل إلى عمها الحارث بن هشام، فاستشار النبي ﷺ فقال: "أعَن حَسَبِها تسألني؟ " قال عليٌّ: قد أعلمُ ما حَسَبُها، ولكن أتأمرني بها؟ فقال: "لا، فاطمةٌ مُضْغةٌ مني ولا أحسَبُ إلَّا وأنها تحزَنْ، أو تَجزَعُ"، فقال عليٌّ: لا آتي شيئًا تَكرَهُه (1).
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين ولم يخرجاه بهذه السِّياقة.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4749 - مرسل قوي
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين ولم يخرجاه بهذه السِّياقة.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4749 - مرسل قوي
It is narrated from Suwayd bin Ghafalah that Sayyiduna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) sought the hand of Abu Jahl's daughter from her paternal uncle al-Harith bin Hisham, and he consulted the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Are you asking me about her lineage?" Sayyiduna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) said: I already know her lineage, but do you command me to marry her? He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No. Fatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) is a piece of me, and I think she would only be grieved or distressed." So Sayyiduna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) said: I will not do anything that she dislikes.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it with this context.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it with this context.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) صحيح لغيره، وهذا إسناد رجاله ثقات لكن ذكر سويد غَفَلة فيه غير محفوظ، إنما هو من مرسل الشَّعبي - واسمه عامر بن شراحيل - لم يذكر فيه سويد بن غَفَلة، وكذلك هو في "فضائل الصحابة" لأحمد بن حنبل (1323)، فالظاهر أنَّ ذكر سويد بن غَفَلة فيه وهمٌ من جهة المصنف، والله تعالى أعلم.
Grading: (1) This hadith is "sahih li-ghayrihi", and the narrators of this chain are thiqah (trustworthy).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): However, the mention of Suwayd bin Ghafalah in it is "not mahfuz" (not preserved). It is actually one of the "mursal" narrations of al-Sha'bi ('Amir bin Sharahil), in which he did not mention Suwayd bin Ghafalah. Likewise it is (without Suwayd) in Ahmad bin Hanbal's "Fada'il al-Sahabah" (1323). So it appears that the mention of Suwayd bin Ghafalah in it is a "wahm" (error) on the part of the author (al-Hakim), and Allah Most High knows best.
وكذلك أخرجه عبد الرزاق (13268) عن سفيان بن عُيينة، وابن أبي شيبة 12/ 128 عن محمد بن بشر، ويونس بن بكير في زياداته على "السيرة النبوية" لابن إسحاق (358) ومن طريقه الدولابي في "الذرية الطاهرة" (56)، ثلاثتهم عن زكريا بن أبي زائدة، عن الشَّعْبي مرسلًا لم يجاوزوه. وانظر حديث المسور بن مخرمة فيما تقدَّم برقم (4787)، وحديث عبد الله بن الزبير الآتي برقم (40806).
Reference / Source: Likewise it was narrated by 'Abd al-Razzaq (13268) from Sufyan bin 'Uyaynah; by Ibn Abi Shaybah [12/ 128] from Muhammad bin Bishr; and by Yunus bin Bukayr in his additions (358) to Ibn Ishaq's "al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah", and via him by al-Dulabi in "al-Dhurriyyah al-Tahirah" (56). All three narrate it from Zakariyya bin Abi Za'idah, from al-Sha'bi, in "mursal" form, and do not go beyond him.
Details of the narration: And see the hadith of al-Miswar bin Makhramah that has passed under no. (4787), and the hadith of 'Abd Allah bin al-Zubayr that will come later under no. (40806).
Grading: (1) This hadith is "sahih li-ghayrihi", and the narrators of this chain are thiqah (trustworthy).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): However, the mention of Suwayd bin Ghafalah in it is "not mahfuz" (not preserved). It is actually one of the "mursal" narrations of al-Sha'bi ('Amir bin Sharahil), in which he did not mention Suwayd bin Ghafalah. Likewise it is (without Suwayd) in Ahmad bin Hanbal's "Fada'il al-Sahabah" (1323). So it appears that the mention of Suwayd bin Ghafalah in it is a "wahm" (error) on the part of the author (al-Hakim), and Allah Most High knows best.
وكذلك أخرجه عبد الرزاق (13268) عن سفيان بن عُيينة، وابن أبي شيبة 12/ 128 عن محمد بن بشر، ويونس بن بكير في زياداته على "السيرة النبوية" لابن إسحاق (358) ومن طريقه الدولابي في "الذرية الطاهرة" (56)، ثلاثتهم عن زكريا بن أبي زائدة، عن الشَّعْبي مرسلًا لم يجاوزوه. وانظر حديث المسور بن مخرمة فيما تقدَّم برقم (4787)، وحديث عبد الله بن الزبير الآتي برقم (40806).
Reference / Source: Likewise it was narrated by 'Abd al-Razzaq (13268) from Sufyan bin 'Uyaynah; by Ibn Abi Shaybah [12/ 128] from Muhammad bin Bishr; and by Yunus bin Bukayr in his additions (358) to Ibn Ishaq's "al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah", and via him by al-Dulabi in "al-Dhurriyyah al-Tahirah" (56). All three narrate it from Zakariyya bin Abi Za'idah, from al-Sha'bi, in "mursal" form, and do not go beyond him.
Details of the narration: And see the hadith of al-Miswar bin Makhramah that has passed under no. (4787), and the hadith of 'Abd Allah bin al-Zubayr that will come later under no. (40806).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4804
