Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
إِنَّ عُثْمَانَ تَبْرُقُ لَهُ الْجَنَّةُ .
Paradise shines for Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4590
اُردوEn
حَدَّثَنَا أبو بكر بن إسحاق، أخبرنا محمد بن هشام بن أبي الدُّمَيك، حَدَّثَنَا الحسين (1) بن عُبيد الله، حَدَّثَنَا عبد العزيز بن أبي حازم، عن أبيه، عن سهل بن سعد قال: سألَ رجلٌ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ: أفي الجنةِ بَرْقٌ؟ قال: "نعم، والذي نفسي بيدِه، إنَّ عثمانَ ليتحوّلُ من مَنزلٍ إلى منزلٍ، فتَبْرُق له الجنّةُ" (2). إن كان الحسين (3) بن عبيد الله هذا حَفِظه عن عبد العزيز بن أبي حازم، فإنه صحيحٌ على شرط الشيخين.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4540 - ذا موضوع
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4540 - ذا موضوع
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Sahl bin Sa'd (may Allah be pleased with him) that a man asked the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him): "Is there the flash of lightning in Paradise?" He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Yes. By the One in whose hand is my soul! Indeed, when Uthman moves from one dwelling to another, Paradise lights up (with his light)."
If al-Husayn bin Ubaydullah has preserved it (in this way) from Abd al-Aziz bin Abi Hazim, then it is sahih on the condition of the two Shaykhs.
If al-Husayn bin Ubaydullah has preserved it (in this way) from Abd al-Aziz bin Abi Hazim, then it is sahih on the condition of the two Shaykhs.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) تحرَّف في النسخ الخطية إلى: الحسن، وضُبِّب فوقه في "تلخيص الذهبي"، وجاء في المطبوع على الصواب وفاقًا لسائر مصادر تخريج الخبر، وقُيِّد في أكثرها بالعجلي، وسماه الذهبي في تعليقه على تصحيح الحاكم على الصواب.
Note / Clarification: (1) In the manuscripts this name has been distorted into "al-Hasan", and in al-Dhahabi's "Talkhis" a mark of doubt (tadbib) has been placed over it. In the printed edition the correct name has come, in agreement with the other sources that record the report, and in most of the sources it is specified with "al-Ijli"; and al-Dhahabi gave his correct name in his comment on al-Hakim's authentication.
(2) إسناده تالفٌ من أجل الحُسين بن عُبيد الله - وهو العجلي - فقد اتُّهم بوضع الحديث، وقال الذهبي في "تلخيصه": ذا موضوع، وقال في "الميزان": هذا كذب، ومِن قَبْله قال ابن عدي بعد أن أورده في "الكامل" 2/ 364: هذا باطل.
Grading: (2) Its chain is "talif" (utterly worthless).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is "al-Husayn bin Ubayd Allah" (al-Ijli), for he has been accused of fabricating hadith, and al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis": This is fabricated (mawdu'), and in "Mizan al-I'tidal" he said: This is a lie. Before him, Ibn Adi, after citing it in "al-Kamil" (2/364), said: This is false.
وأخرجه ابن عدي في "الكامل" 2/ 364، وأبو حفص بن شاهين في "شرح مذاهب أهل السنة" (110)، وأبو نُعيم في "فضائل الخلفاء الراشدين" (45)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 39/ 108، وابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" (622) من طريقين عن الحسين بن عُبيد الله العجلي، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Ibn Adi recorded it in "al-Kamil" (2/364), Abu Hafs bin Shahin in "Sharh Madhahib Ahl al-Sunnah" (110), Abu Nu'aym in "Fada'il al-Khulafa' al-Rashidin" (45), Ibn Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (39/108) and Ibn al-Jawzi in "al-Mawdu'at" (622), through two routes from al-Husayn bin Ubayd Allah al-Ijli, with this chain.
(3) تحرّف هنا أيضًا إلى: الحسن.
Note / Clarification: (3) Here too the name has been distorted and written as "al-Hasan" (whereas the correct form is al-Husayn).
Note / Clarification: (1) In the manuscripts this name has been distorted into "al-Hasan", and in al-Dhahabi's "Talkhis" a mark of doubt (tadbib) has been placed over it. In the printed edition the correct name has come, in agreement with the other sources that record the report, and in most of the sources it is specified with "al-Ijli"; and al-Dhahabi gave his correct name in his comment on al-Hakim's authentication.
(2) إسناده تالفٌ من أجل الحُسين بن عُبيد الله - وهو العجلي - فقد اتُّهم بوضع الحديث، وقال الذهبي في "تلخيصه": ذا موضوع، وقال في "الميزان": هذا كذب، ومِن قَبْله قال ابن عدي بعد أن أورده في "الكامل" 2/ 364: هذا باطل.
Grading: (2) Its chain is "talif" (utterly worthless).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is "al-Husayn bin Ubayd Allah" (al-Ijli), for he has been accused of fabricating hadith, and al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis": This is fabricated (mawdu'), and in "Mizan al-I'tidal" he said: This is a lie. Before him, Ibn Adi, after citing it in "al-Kamil" (2/364), said: This is false.
وأخرجه ابن عدي في "الكامل" 2/ 364، وأبو حفص بن شاهين في "شرح مذاهب أهل السنة" (110)، وأبو نُعيم في "فضائل الخلفاء الراشدين" (45)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 39/ 108، وابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" (622) من طريقين عن الحسين بن عُبيد الله العجلي، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Ibn Adi recorded it in "al-Kamil" (2/364), Abu Hafs bin Shahin in "Sharh Madhahib Ahl al-Sunnah" (110), Abu Nu'aym in "Fada'il al-Khulafa' al-Rashidin" (45), Ibn Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (39/108) and Ibn al-Jawzi in "al-Mawdu'at" (622), through two routes from al-Husayn bin Ubayd Allah al-Ijli, with this chain.
(3) تحرّف هنا أيضًا إلى: الحسن.
Note / Clarification: (3) Here too the name has been distorted and written as "al-Hasan" (whereas the correct form is al-Husayn).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4590
