Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب التفسير
Book of Tafsir
تَفْسِيرُ سُورَةِ { وَالْفَجْرِ }
Tafsir of Surah al-Fajr
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 3971
اُردوEn
حدثني أبو بكر محمد بن أحمد بن بالَوَيه، حدَّثنا بشْر بن موسى، حدَّثنا خلاد بن يحيى، حدَّثنا سفيان، عن الأغرِّ بن خليفة، عن حُصَين بن عُقبة (1)، عن أبي نَصْر، عن ابن عبَّاس: ﴿وَالْفَجْرِ﴾ قال: فجرُ النهار ﴿وَلَيَالٍ عَشْرٍ﴾ قال: عَشرُ الأضحى (2).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه. وأبو نَصْر هذا: هو الأسوَد بن هلال (3).
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 3927 - صحيح
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه. وأبو نَصْر هذا: هو الأسوَد بن هلال (3).
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 3927 - صحيح
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) concerning the saying of Allah Almighty "By the dawn" [Surah al-Fajr: 1], that he said: What is meant is the dawn of the day; and concerning "and by the ten nights" [Surah al-Fajr: 2] he said: What is meant is the (first) ten nights of Dhu al-Hijjah.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it; and the Abu Nasr in its chain is in fact al-Aswad bin Hilal.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it; and the Abu Nasr in its chain is in fact al-Aswad bin Hilal.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) في النسخ الخطية: سفيان عن الأغر بن خليفة عن حصين بن عقبة، هكذا هي رواية الحاكم، بدليل أنَّ البيهقي قد رواه عنه في "شعب الإيمان" (3469) و "فضائل الأوقات" (168) على هذه الصورة، فهذا خطأ قديم، فليس في الرواة من اسمه الأغر بن خليفة يروي عن حصين بن عقبة، والصواب كما وقع في المطبوع: الأغر عن خليفة بن حصين بن قيس؛ والأغر: هو ابن الصباح المنقري.
Note / Clarification: In the manuscripts it is "Sufyan 'an al-Agharr bin Khalifah 'an Husayn bin 'Uqbah". This is how al-Hakim's narration reads, as shown by the fact that al-Bayhaqi narrated it from him in "Shu'ab al-Iman" (3469) and "Fada'il al-Awqat" (168) in this form. It is an old "error", for there is no narrator named "al-Agharr bin Khalifah" who narrates from Husayn bin Uqbah. The correct form is what occurs in the printed edition: "al-Agharr 'an Khalifah bin Husayn bin Qays"; and al-Agharr is "Ibn al-Sabbah al-Minqari".
(2) إسناده لا بأس برجاله إلا أنَّ أبا نصر - وهو الأسدي - لم يُعرف بسماعه من ابن عبَّاس كما قال البخاري في النِّكاح من "صحيحه" بإثر الحديث (5105). سفيان: هو الثوري.
Grading: There is no harm in the narrators of this chain, except that Abu Nasr (al-Asadi) is not known to have heard from Ibn Abbas, as al-Bukhari said in the Book of Marriage of his "Sahih" after hadith (5105). Sufyan is "al-Thawri".
وأخرجه البيهقي عن أبي عبد الله الحاكم بهذا الإسناد كما سبق.
Reference / Source: It was narrated by al-Bayhaqi from Abu Abdullah al-Hakim with this chain, as already mentioned.
وأخرجه الطبري في "تفسيره" 30/ 168 و 169 من طريق مهران الرازي، عن سفيان الثوري، به.
Reference / Source: It was narrated by al-Tabari in his Tafsir (30/168, 169) via Mihran al-Razi, from Sufyan al-Thawri, likewise.
(3) كذا قال المصنف، ولم يتابعه عليه أحد ممن ترجم لأبي نصر، فإنه لا يعرف إلا بكنيته، وأما الأسود بن هلال فآخرُ، كنيتُه أبو سلام، وهو من كبراء التابعين أدرك أيام الجاهلية، وقد خرَّج له الشيخان.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): This is what the author (al-Hakim) said, but none of those who wrote biographies of Abu Nasr agreed with him on it, for he is known only by his kunyah. Al-Aswad bin Hilal is a different person whose kunyah is "Abu Sallam"; he is one of the senior Tabi'in who lived in the days of Jahiliyyah, and the two Shaykhs (al-Bukhari and Muslim) narrated from him.
Note / Clarification: In the manuscripts it is "Sufyan 'an al-Agharr bin Khalifah 'an Husayn bin 'Uqbah". This is how al-Hakim's narration reads, as shown by the fact that al-Bayhaqi narrated it from him in "Shu'ab al-Iman" (3469) and "Fada'il al-Awqat" (168) in this form. It is an old "error", for there is no narrator named "al-Agharr bin Khalifah" who narrates from Husayn bin Uqbah. The correct form is what occurs in the printed edition: "al-Agharr 'an Khalifah bin Husayn bin Qays"; and al-Agharr is "Ibn al-Sabbah al-Minqari".
(2) إسناده لا بأس برجاله إلا أنَّ أبا نصر - وهو الأسدي - لم يُعرف بسماعه من ابن عبَّاس كما قال البخاري في النِّكاح من "صحيحه" بإثر الحديث (5105). سفيان: هو الثوري.
Grading: There is no harm in the narrators of this chain, except that Abu Nasr (al-Asadi) is not known to have heard from Ibn Abbas, as al-Bukhari said in the Book of Marriage of his "Sahih" after hadith (5105). Sufyan is "al-Thawri".
وأخرجه البيهقي عن أبي عبد الله الحاكم بهذا الإسناد كما سبق.
Reference / Source: It was narrated by al-Bayhaqi from Abu Abdullah al-Hakim with this chain, as already mentioned.
وأخرجه الطبري في "تفسيره" 30/ 168 و 169 من طريق مهران الرازي، عن سفيان الثوري، به.
Reference / Source: It was narrated by al-Tabari in his Tafsir (30/168, 169) via Mihran al-Razi, from Sufyan al-Thawri, likewise.
(3) كذا قال المصنف، ولم يتابعه عليه أحد ممن ترجم لأبي نصر، فإنه لا يعرف إلا بكنيته، وأما الأسود بن هلال فآخرُ، كنيتُه أبو سلام، وهو من كبراء التابعين أدرك أيام الجاهلية، وقد خرَّج له الشيخان.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): This is what the author (al-Hakim) said, but none of those who wrote biographies of Abu Nasr agreed with him on it, for he is known only by his kunyah. Al-Aswad bin Hilal is a different person whose kunyah is "Abu Sallam"; he is one of the senior Tabi'in who lived in the days of Jahiliyyah, and the two Shaykhs (al-Bukhari and Muslim) narrated from him.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 3971
