Scholarly Consensus on the Heresy and Execution of al-Hallaj

اردو میں پڑھیں
Font size:

Ḥusayn ibn Manṣūr al-Ḥallāj: Scholarly Verdict

Taken from: Fatawa Ameenpuri by Shaykh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer Ameenpuri

❖ Question:

What do scholars say about Ḥusayn ibn Manṣūr al-Ḥallāj?

❖ Answer:

Ḥusayn ibn Manṣūr al-Ḥallāj (d. 309 AH) was a zindīq (heretic) and a believer in ḥulūl (the belief that Allah indwells within creation).

  • The scholars of truth reached ijmā‘ (consensus) on his disbelief and heresy.
  • His core belief was that Allah had entered everything — the root of the doctrine later known as Wahdat al-Wujūd (unity of existence).
  • Due to this kufr and deviation, the scholars declared his execution lawful, and he was executed.
  • Even today, extremist Ṣūfīs regard al-Ḥallāj as their spiritual leader.

📚 Statements of Scholars

❀ Imam Ibn al-Jawzi (597 AH):
“A group of Sufis, out of ignorance and disregard for the consensus of the jurists, showed partisanship towards al-Ḥallāj.”
(Talbīs Iblīs, p. 155)

❀ Hafiz Ibn Kathir (774 AH):
“He was killed by the consensus of the jurists.”
(al-Bidāyah wa’l-Nihāyah, 14/786)

✅ Conclusion:
Ḥallāj was unanimously declared a heretic by the scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah. His execution was based on ijmā‘ of the fuqahā’, and his doctrines are considered clear disbelief.