Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
السنن الكبرى للبيهقي
Sunan al-Kubra al-Bayhaqi
كتاب الحج
Book of Hajj
باب: فدية النعام وبقر الوحش وحمار الوحش
Chapter: The compensation for the ostrich, the wild cow and the wild ass
Bayhaqi 9868 — The compensation for the ostrich, the wild cow
اُردوEn
وَبِهَذَا الْإِسْنَادِ عَنِ الشَّافِعِيِّ، أنبأ سَعِيدُ بْنُ سَالِمٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، عَنْ عَطَاءٍ الْخُرَاسَانِيِّ، أَنَّ عُمَرَ، وَعُثْمَانَ، وَعَلِيَّ بْنَ أَبِي طَالِبٍ، وَزَيْدَ بْنَ ثَابِتٍ، وَابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ وَمُعَاوِيَةَ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُمْ، قَالُوا: " فِي النَّعَامَةِ يَقْتُلُهَا الْمُحْرِمُ بَدَنَةٌ مِنَ الْإِبِلِ "، قَالَ الشَّافِعِيُّ: هَذَا غَيْرُ ثَابِتٍ عِنْدَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ بِالْحَدِيثِ، وَهُوَ قَوْلُ الْأَكْثَرِ مِمَّنْ لَقِيتُ فَبِقَوْلِهِمْ: إِنَّ فِي النَّعَامَةِ بَدَنَةً وَبِالْقِيَاسِ قُلْنَا: فِي النَّعَامَةِ بَدَنَةٌ لَا بِهَذَا، قَالَ الشَّيْخُ: وَجْهُ ضَعْفِهِ كَوْنُهُ مُرْسَلًا، فَإِنَّ عَطَاءً الْخُرَاسَانِيَّ وُلِدَ سَنَةَ خَمْسِينَ وَلَمْ يُدْرِكْ عُمَرَ، وَلَا عُثْمَانَ وَلَا عَلِيًّا، وَلَا زَيْدًا وَكَانَ فِي زَمَنِ مُعَاوِيَةَ صَبِيًّا وَلَمْ يَثْبُتْ لَهُ سَمَاعٌ مِنَ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ وَإنْ كَانَ يُحْتَمَلُ أَنْ يَكُونَ سَمِعَ مِنْهُ فَإِنَّ ابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ تُوُفِّيَ سَنَةَ ثَمَانٍ وَسِتِّينَ إِلَّا أَنَّ عَطَاءً الْخُرَاسَانِيَّ مَعَ انْقِطَاعِ حَدِيثِهِ عَمَّنْ سَمَّيْنَا مِمَّنْ تَكَلَّمَ فِيهِ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ بِالْحَدِيثِ، وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ.
Ata al-Khurasani says that Sayyiduna Umar, Uthman, Ali bin Abi Talib, Zayd bin Thabit, Ibn Abbas and Mu'awiyah (may Allah be pleased with them) all held that for an ostrich killed by a muhrim, the sacrifice of a camel is due.
Al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him) said: This is not established according to the scholars of hadith. However, it is the view of most of those I have met, so on the basis of their view and of analogy we say that for an ostrich a camel is due, not on the basis of this (report).
The Shaykh (al-Bayhaqi) said: The reason for its weakness is that it is mursal, for Ata al-Khurasani was born in the year 50 and did not meet Umar, Uthman, Ali or Zayd, and he was a child in the time of Mu'awiyah. His hearing from Ibn Abbas is not established, although it is possible that he heard from him, since Ibn Abbas died in the year 68. Moreover, besides the break in his narration from those we have named, Ata al-Khurasani is among those whom the scholars of hadith have criticised. And Allah knows best.
Al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him) said: This is not established according to the scholars of hadith. However, it is the view of most of those I have met, so on the basis of their view and of analogy we say that for an ostrich a camel is due, not on the basis of this (report).
The Shaykh (al-Bayhaqi) said: The reason for its weakness is that it is mursal, for Ata al-Khurasani was born in the year 50 and did not meet Umar, Uthman, Ali or Zayd, and he was a child in the time of Mu'awiyah. His hearing from Ibn Abbas is not established, although it is possible that he heard from him, since Ibn Abbas died in the year 68. Moreover, besides the break in his narration from those we have named, Ata al-Khurasani is among those whom the scholars of hadith have criticised. And Allah knows best.
