Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Bayhaqi 16723 — Those who said: There is no liability for wounds

أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو سَعِيدِ بْنُ أَبِي عَمْرٍو، ثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ الْأَصَمُّ، ثَنَا بَحْرُ بْنُ نَصْرٍِ، ثَنَا عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ وَهْبٍٍ، أَخْبَرَنِي يُونُسُ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، قَالَ: " قَدْ هَاجَتِ الْفِتْنَةُ الْأُولَى، وَأَدْرَكَتْ، يَعْنِي الْفِتْنَةَ، رِجَالًا ذَوِي عَدَدٍ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ مِمَّنْ شَهِدَ مَعَهُ بَدْرًا، وَبَلَغَنَا أَنَّهُمْ كَانُوا يَرَوْنَ أَنْ يُهْدَرَ أَمْرُ الْفِتْنَةِ، وَلَا يُقَامُ فِيهَا عَلَى رَجُلٍ قَاتِلٍ، فِي تَأْوِيلِ الْقُرْآنِ، قِصَاصٌ فِيمَنْ قَتَلَ، وَلَا حَدٌّ فِي سِبَاءِ امْرَأَةٍ سُبِيَتْ وَلَا يُرَى عَلَيْهَا حَدٌّ، وَلَا بَيْنَهَا وَبَيْنَ زَوْجِهَا مُلَاعَنَةٌ، وَلَا يُرَى أَنْ يَقْفُوهَا أَحَدٌ إِلَّا جُلِدَ الْحَدَّ، وَيُرَى أَنْ تُرَدَّ إِلَى زَوْجِهَا الْأَوَّلِ بَعْدَ أَنْ تَعْتَدَّ فَتَقْضِيَ عِدَّتَهَا مِنْ زَوْجِهَا الْآخَرِ، وَيُرَى أَنْ يَرِثَهَا زَوْجُهَا الْأَوَّلُ.
Ibn Shihab (may Allah have mercy on him) says: When the first fitnah (civil strife) flared up, it reached many of the Companions who had been at Badr (may Allah be pleased with them) as well. And it reached us that they held that the matters of the fitnah were to be disregarded: no retaliation (qisas) was imposed on anyone who killed in it on the basis of an interpretation of the Qur'an; there was no hadd punishment concerning a woman taken captive (in it) — no hadd was considered due upon her, nor was li'an conducted between her and her husband; they held that whoever accused her (of adultery) was to be flogged the hadd punishment; and they held that she was to be returned to her first husband after completing her waiting period ('iddah) from the second husband, and that her first husband would inherit from her.
Hadith Reference السنن الكبرى للبيهقي / كتاب قتال أهل البغي / 16723
Hadith Grading محدثین: صحيح
Hadith Takhrij «صحيح۔ لابن شهاب»