Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب الفتن والملاحم
Book of Trials and Great Battles
حِلْيَةُ الدَّجَّالِ بِلِسَانِ النَّبِيِّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَآلِهِ وَسَلَّمَ - 3519 - هَلَاكُ يَأْجُوجَ وَمَأْجُوجَ
The description of the Dajjal by the tongue of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 8719
اُردوEn
أخبرني محمد بن المؤمَّل بن الحسن، حدثنا الفضل بن محمد بن المسيَّب، حدثنا نُعيم بن حمّاد، حدثنا الوليد بن مسلم، عن الأوزاعي، عن الزُّهْري، عن سعيد بن المسيّب، عن أبي هريرة قال: وُلِدَ لأخي أُمِّ سَلَمة غلامٌ فسمَّوه الوليد، فذُكِرَ ذلك لرسول الله ﷺ فقال: "سمَّيتُموه بأَسامي فراعنتِكم، ليكونَنَّ في هذه الأُمَّة رجل يقال له: الوليدُ، هو شرٌّ على هذه الأُمَّة من فِرعونَ على قومِه" (1). قال الزُّهْري: إن استُخلِفَ الوليدُ بن يزيد فهو هو، وإلَّا فالوليدُ بن عبد الملك.
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، ولم يُخرجاه. هذا الوليد بن يزيد بلا شكٍّ ولا مِرْية:
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 8509 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، ولم يُخرجاه. هذا الوليد بن يزيد بلا شكٍّ ولا مِرْية:
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 8509 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that a boy was born to the brother of the Mother of the Believers Sayyidah Umm Salamah (may Allah be pleased with her), and they named him al-Walid. When this was mentioned to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), he (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "You have named him after the names of your Pharaohs. There will certainly be a man in this Ummah called al-Walid, who will prove to be worse for this Ummah than Pharaoh was for his people." Imam al-Zuhri says: If al-Walid bin Yazid becomes caliph, then he is the one meant; otherwise it is al-Walid bin Abd al-Malik.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it; and (according to the author of al-Mustadrak) this is without any doubt or uncertainty al-Walid bin Yazid.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), but they did not record it; and (according to the author of al-Mustadrak) this is without any doubt or uncertainty al-Walid bin Yazid.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) رجاله ثقات غير نعيم بن حماد فصدوق حسن الحديث، وقد توبع على أصل الحديث، إلّا أنه وقع في إسناده اختلاف على الأوزاعي - وهو عبد الرحمن بن عمرو - والمحفوظ فيه عن الزهري عن سعيد بن المسيب مرسلًا، وذِكر أبي هريرة فيه هنا - إن كان محفوظًا - وهمٌ من نعيم بن حماد أو من دونه، فإن الحديث في كتابه "الفتن" (328) عن سعيد بن المسيب مرسلًا ليس فيه أبو هريرة.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): All the narrators of this chain are thiqah (trustworthy) except Nu'aym bin Hammad, who is saduq (truthful) and hasan in hadith, and he has been corroborated on the basic hadith. However, in this chain there is a variation over Imam al-Awza'i ('Abd al-Rahman bin 'Amr).
Grading: What is preserved (the preponderant view) here is that this report is narrated from Imam al-Zuhri, from Sa'id bin al-Musayyab as "mursal" (without the intermediary of a Companion).
Technical note: The mention of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) in the chain here - if it is preserved in the manuscript - is a "wahm" (mistake) by Nu'aym bin Hammad or someone below him, because in Nu'aym bin Hammad's own book "al-Fitan" (no. 328) this hadith is narrated from Sa'id bin al-Musayyab as mursal only, and Abu Hurayrah is not mentioned in it.
وهكذا رواه مرسلًا محمد بن خالد السكسكي - وهو أحد الثقات - عند البيهقي في "دلائل النبوة" 6/ 505، ومن طريقه ابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 63/ 322 - 323 عن الوليد بن مسلم، بهذا الإسناد. لم يذكر فيه أبا هريرة.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Likewise, Muhammad bin Khalid al-Saksaki - who is one of the thiqah narrators - also narrated this report as "mursal".
Reference / Source: Imam al-Bayhaqi narrated it in "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" (6/505), and by his route Ibn 'Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (63/322-323), from al-Walid bin Muslim with this same chain, and he did not mention Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) in it.
ورواه كذلك بشرُ بن بكر التنيسي عند البيهقي أيضًا 6/ 505 - ومن طريقه ابن عساكر 63/ 323 - وهِقْلُ بن زياد ومحمدُ بن كثير المصيصي عند ابن عساكر 63/ 323، ثلاثتهم عن الأوزاعي، عن سعيد بن المسيب مرسلًا، إلّا أنَّ محمد بن كثير لم يذكر سعيدًا فيه. وقال البيهقي: هذا مرسل حسن.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Also, Bishr bin Bakr al-Tinnisi (in al-Bayhaqi: 6/505 and Ibn 'Asakir: 63/323), and Hiql bin Ziyad and Muhammad bin Kathir al-Missisi (in Ibn 'Asakir: 63/323) narrated it in the same way. All three of them (Bishr, Hiql, Muhammad) report it from Imam al-Awza'i, from Sa'id bin al-Musayyab as "mursal", except that Muhammad bin Kathir did not mention Sa'id bin al-Musayyab in it.
Grading: Imam al-Bayhaqi said: This is a "hasan mursal".
ورواه معمر في "جامعه" (19861) - وهو في "أمالي عبد الرزاق" أيضًا (172) عنه - عن الزهري بهذا الحديث بنحوه، لم يذكر فيه سعيد بن المسيب.
Details of the narration: Imam Ma'mar narrated it in his "Jami'" (no. 19861) - and this report is also found in "Amali 'Abd al-Razzaq" (no. 172) - from al-Zuhri with a similar meaning, but he did not mention Sa'id bin al-Musayyab in it.
وخرَّجه الحافظ ابن حجر في "فتح الباري" 18/ 624 من "الأمالي" لعبد الرزاق مذكورًا فيه سعيد! ورواه إسماعيل بن عياش عن الأوزاعي، واختُلف عليه فيه: فرواه عنه أبو المغيرة عبد القدوس بن الحجاج عند أحمد في "المسند" 1/ (109)، فجعله من رواية سعيد بن المسيب عن عمر بن الخطاب.
Reference / Source: Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) cited it in "Fath al-Bari" (18/624) from the "Amali" of 'Abd al-Razzaq with Sa'id bin al-Musayyab mentioned in it!
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Isma'il bin 'Ayyash also narrated it from Imam al-Awza'i, but there is a variation over him in it. Abu al-Mughirah 'Abd al-Quddus bin al-Hajjaj narrated it from him (in Musnad Ahmad: 1/109) and made it Sa'id bin al-Musayyab from 'Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him).
وخالفه إسماعيل بن أبي إسماعيل المؤدب عند الحارث بن أبي أسامة في "مسنده" (804 - بغية الباحث) فرواه عن إسماعيل بن عياش مرسلًا، لم يذكر فيه عمر. ومع أن إسماعيل المؤدب هذا ضعيف، إلّا أنَّ روايته هي الصواب لموافقتها الروايات الأخرى، وذِكر عمر فيه خطأ.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Abu al-Mughirah was contradicted by Isma'il bin Abi Isma'il al-Mu'addib (in the "Musnad" of al-Harith bin Abi Usamah, no. 804 - Bughyat al-Bahith), who narrated it from Isma'il bin 'Ayyash as "mursal" and did not mention 'Umar in it.
Grading: Although this Isma'il al-Mu'addib is a weak narrator, his narration is the correct one because it agrees with the other narrations, and mentioning 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) in it is a mistake.
وذكر حديث عمر هذا ابن حبان في ترجمة إسماعيل بن عياش من "المجروحين" 1/ 125 وقال: هذا خبر باطل، ما قال رسول الله ﷺ هذا، ولا عمرُ رواه، ولا سعيدٌ حدَّث به، ولا الزهريُّ رواه، ولا هو من حديث الأوزاعي بهذا الإسناد. وتابعه ابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" 1/ 244 (330).
Grading: Ibn Hibban mentioned this hadith of 'Umar in "al-Majruhin" (1/125) in the biography of Isma'il bin 'Ayyash and said: "This report is false; the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) did not say this, nor did 'Umar narrate it, nor did Sa'id relate it, nor did al-Zuhri narrate it, nor is it from the hadith of Imam al-Awza'i with this chain."
Reference / Source: And Ibn al-Jawzi followed (agreed with) Ibn Hibban in "al-Mawdu'at" (1/244, no. 330).
وتعقَّبهما الحافظ ابن حجر في "الفتح" 18/ 624 وفي "القول المسدَّد" بأنَّ للحديث أصلًا من غير رواية إسماعيل بن عياش كما سبق، ثم قال: إن كان سعيد بن المسيب تلقَّاه عن أم سلمة فهو على شرط الصحيح، ويؤيد ذلك أنَّ له شاهدًا عن أم سلمة أخرجه إبراهيم الحربي في "غريب الحديث" من رواية محمد بن إسحاق عن محمد بن عمرو بن عطاء عن زينب بنت أم سلمة عن أمها قالت: دخل النبي ﷺ وعندي غلام من آل المغيرة اسمه الوليد، فقال: "من هذا؟ " قلت الوليد، قال: "قد اتخذتم الوليد حَنَانًا، غيِّروا اسمَه، فإنه سيكون في هذه الأمة فرعون يقال له: الوليد".
Important point: Hafiz Ibn Hajar, in "al-Fath" (18/624) and in "al-Qawl al-Musaddad", objected to both of them (Ibn Hibban and Ibn al-Jawzi) on the grounds that this hadith has a "basis" through routes other than Isma'il bin 'Ayyash, as has already passed. Then he said: If Sa'id bin al-Musayyab received it from Umm Salamah (may Allah be pleased with her), then it meets the condition of the Sahih.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: This is supported by the fact that there is a "shahid" (supporting report) for it from Umm Salamah (may Allah be pleased with her), which Ibrahim al-Harbi narrated in "Gharib al-Hadith" by the route of Muhammad bin Ishaq, from Muhammad bin 'Amr bin 'Ata', from Zaynab bint Umm Salamah, from Umm Salamah, that she said: The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) came in, and with me was a boy from the family of al-Mughirah whose name was al-Walid. He asked: "Who is this?" I said: al-Walid. He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "You have taken al-Walid as something dear; change his name, for there will soon be in this Ummah a Pharaoh who will be called al-Walid."
Technical note / Defect ('illah): All the narrators of this chain are thiqah (trustworthy) except Nu'aym bin Hammad, who is saduq (truthful) and hasan in hadith, and he has been corroborated on the basic hadith. However, in this chain there is a variation over Imam al-Awza'i ('Abd al-Rahman bin 'Amr).
Grading: What is preserved (the preponderant view) here is that this report is narrated from Imam al-Zuhri, from Sa'id bin al-Musayyab as "mursal" (without the intermediary of a Companion).
Technical note: The mention of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) in the chain here - if it is preserved in the manuscript - is a "wahm" (mistake) by Nu'aym bin Hammad or someone below him, because in Nu'aym bin Hammad's own book "al-Fitan" (no. 328) this hadith is narrated from Sa'id bin al-Musayyab as mursal only, and Abu Hurayrah is not mentioned in it.
وهكذا رواه مرسلًا محمد بن خالد السكسكي - وهو أحد الثقات - عند البيهقي في "دلائل النبوة" 6/ 505، ومن طريقه ابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 63/ 322 - 323 عن الوليد بن مسلم، بهذا الإسناد. لم يذكر فيه أبا هريرة.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Likewise, Muhammad bin Khalid al-Saksaki - who is one of the thiqah narrators - also narrated this report as "mursal".
Reference / Source: Imam al-Bayhaqi narrated it in "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" (6/505), and by his route Ibn 'Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (63/322-323), from al-Walid bin Muslim with this same chain, and he did not mention Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) in it.
ورواه كذلك بشرُ بن بكر التنيسي عند البيهقي أيضًا 6/ 505 - ومن طريقه ابن عساكر 63/ 323 - وهِقْلُ بن زياد ومحمدُ بن كثير المصيصي عند ابن عساكر 63/ 323، ثلاثتهم عن الأوزاعي، عن سعيد بن المسيب مرسلًا، إلّا أنَّ محمد بن كثير لم يذكر سعيدًا فيه. وقال البيهقي: هذا مرسل حسن.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Also, Bishr bin Bakr al-Tinnisi (in al-Bayhaqi: 6/505 and Ibn 'Asakir: 63/323), and Hiql bin Ziyad and Muhammad bin Kathir al-Missisi (in Ibn 'Asakir: 63/323) narrated it in the same way. All three of them (Bishr, Hiql, Muhammad) report it from Imam al-Awza'i, from Sa'id bin al-Musayyab as "mursal", except that Muhammad bin Kathir did not mention Sa'id bin al-Musayyab in it.
Grading: Imam al-Bayhaqi said: This is a "hasan mursal".
ورواه معمر في "جامعه" (19861) - وهو في "أمالي عبد الرزاق" أيضًا (172) عنه - عن الزهري بهذا الحديث بنحوه، لم يذكر فيه سعيد بن المسيب.
Details of the narration: Imam Ma'mar narrated it in his "Jami'" (no. 19861) - and this report is also found in "Amali 'Abd al-Razzaq" (no. 172) - from al-Zuhri with a similar meaning, but he did not mention Sa'id bin al-Musayyab in it.
وخرَّجه الحافظ ابن حجر في "فتح الباري" 18/ 624 من "الأمالي" لعبد الرزاق مذكورًا فيه سعيد! ورواه إسماعيل بن عياش عن الأوزاعي، واختُلف عليه فيه: فرواه عنه أبو المغيرة عبد القدوس بن الحجاج عند أحمد في "المسند" 1/ (109)، فجعله من رواية سعيد بن المسيب عن عمر بن الخطاب.
Reference / Source: Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) cited it in "Fath al-Bari" (18/624) from the "Amali" of 'Abd al-Razzaq with Sa'id bin al-Musayyab mentioned in it!
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Isma'il bin 'Ayyash also narrated it from Imam al-Awza'i, but there is a variation over him in it. Abu al-Mughirah 'Abd al-Quddus bin al-Hajjaj narrated it from him (in Musnad Ahmad: 1/109) and made it Sa'id bin al-Musayyab from 'Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him).
وخالفه إسماعيل بن أبي إسماعيل المؤدب عند الحارث بن أبي أسامة في "مسنده" (804 - بغية الباحث) فرواه عن إسماعيل بن عياش مرسلًا، لم يذكر فيه عمر. ومع أن إسماعيل المؤدب هذا ضعيف، إلّا أنَّ روايته هي الصواب لموافقتها الروايات الأخرى، وذِكر عمر فيه خطأ.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Abu al-Mughirah was contradicted by Isma'il bin Abi Isma'il al-Mu'addib (in the "Musnad" of al-Harith bin Abi Usamah, no. 804 - Bughyat al-Bahith), who narrated it from Isma'il bin 'Ayyash as "mursal" and did not mention 'Umar in it.
Grading: Although this Isma'il al-Mu'addib is a weak narrator, his narration is the correct one because it agrees with the other narrations, and mentioning 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) in it is a mistake.
وذكر حديث عمر هذا ابن حبان في ترجمة إسماعيل بن عياش من "المجروحين" 1/ 125 وقال: هذا خبر باطل، ما قال رسول الله ﷺ هذا، ولا عمرُ رواه، ولا سعيدٌ حدَّث به، ولا الزهريُّ رواه، ولا هو من حديث الأوزاعي بهذا الإسناد. وتابعه ابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" 1/ 244 (330).
Grading: Ibn Hibban mentioned this hadith of 'Umar in "al-Majruhin" (1/125) in the biography of Isma'il bin 'Ayyash and said: "This report is false; the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) did not say this, nor did 'Umar narrate it, nor did Sa'id relate it, nor did al-Zuhri narrate it, nor is it from the hadith of Imam al-Awza'i with this chain."
Reference / Source: And Ibn al-Jawzi followed (agreed with) Ibn Hibban in "al-Mawdu'at" (1/244, no. 330).
وتعقَّبهما الحافظ ابن حجر في "الفتح" 18/ 624 وفي "القول المسدَّد" بأنَّ للحديث أصلًا من غير رواية إسماعيل بن عياش كما سبق، ثم قال: إن كان سعيد بن المسيب تلقَّاه عن أم سلمة فهو على شرط الصحيح، ويؤيد ذلك أنَّ له شاهدًا عن أم سلمة أخرجه إبراهيم الحربي في "غريب الحديث" من رواية محمد بن إسحاق عن محمد بن عمرو بن عطاء عن زينب بنت أم سلمة عن أمها قالت: دخل النبي ﷺ وعندي غلام من آل المغيرة اسمه الوليد، فقال: "من هذا؟ " قلت الوليد، قال: "قد اتخذتم الوليد حَنَانًا، غيِّروا اسمَه، فإنه سيكون في هذه الأمة فرعون يقال له: الوليد".
Important point: Hafiz Ibn Hajar, in "al-Fath" (18/624) and in "al-Qawl al-Musaddad", objected to both of them (Ibn Hibban and Ibn al-Jawzi) on the grounds that this hadith has a "basis" through routes other than Isma'il bin 'Ayyash, as has already passed. Then he said: If Sa'id bin al-Musayyab received it from Umm Salamah (may Allah be pleased with her), then it meets the condition of the Sahih.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: This is supported by the fact that there is a "shahid" (supporting report) for it from Umm Salamah (may Allah be pleased with her), which Ibrahim al-Harbi narrated in "Gharib al-Hadith" by the route of Muhammad bin Ishaq, from Muhammad bin 'Amr bin 'Ata', from Zaynab bint Umm Salamah, from Umm Salamah, that she said: The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) came in, and with me was a boy from the family of al-Mughirah whose name was al-Walid. He asked: "Who is this?" I said: al-Walid. He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "You have taken al-Walid as something dear; change his name, for there will soon be in this Ummah a Pharaoh who will be called al-Walid."
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 8719
