Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب الأحكام
Book of Judgments
مَنْ أَرْضَى سُلْطَانًا بِسَخَطِ رَبِّهِ خَرَجَ مِنْ دِينِ اللَّهِ
Whoever pleases a ruler by angering his Lord has left the religion of Allah
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 7248
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو بكر بن إسحاق، أخبرنا محمد بن أيوب، أخبرنا غسّان بن مالك، حدثنا عَنْبسة بن عبد الرحمن، عن علَّاق بن أبي مسلم، قال: سمعتُ جابر بن عبد الله يقول: قال رسول الله ﷺ: "مَن أرضَى سلطانًا بسَخَطِ ربِّه ﷿، خرجَ من دين الله ﵎" (1). تفرَّد به علَّاق بن أبي مسلم، والرُّواة إليه كلُّهم ثقات. آخر كتاب الأحكام ﷽ [كتاب الأطعمة]
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7071 - تفرد به علاق والرواة إليه ثقات
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7071 - تفرد به علاق والرواة إليه ثقات
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Jabir bin Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with them both) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Whoever pleases a ruler at the cost of the displeasure of his Lord, the Mighty and Majestic, has left the religion of Allah." Allaq bin Abi Muslim is alone in narrating this, and all the narrators up to him are trustworthy (thiqah).
Here the Book of Rulings (Kitab al-Ahkam) is complete.
Here the Book of Rulings (Kitab al-Ahkam) is complete.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) إسناده ضعيف جدًّا، غسان بن مالك قال أبو حاتم: ليس بقوي بيِّنٌ في حديثه الإنكار، وعنبسة بن عبد الرحمن متهم، وشيخه علاق تفرد بالرواية عنه عنبسة، وقال الأزدي: ذاهب الحديث، وقال الذهبي في "الكاشف": واهٍ، وقال ابن حجر: مجهول.
Grading: Its chain is "da'if jiddan" (extremely weak).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Concerning Ghassan bin Malik, Abu Hatim said that he is not strong and that objectionable material (nakarah) is evident in his hadith. Anbasah bin Abd al-Rahman is an "accused" narrator, and Anbasah is alone in narrating from his teacher "Allaq"; al-Azdi called him "dhahib al-hadith" (his hadith is worthless), al-Dhahabi called him "wahin" (very feeble) in "al-Kashif", and Ibn Hajr declared him "majhul" (unknown).
ويقال: إنه عبد الملك بن علاق، كما أشار إلى ذلك الحافظ المزِّي في "التهذيب"، وجهله الترمذي، وقال الأزدي: متروك الحديث.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): It is also said that his name is Abd al-Malik bin Allaq, as al-Hafiz al-Mizzi indicated in "al-Tahdhib"; Imam al-Tirmidhi called him "majhul", and al-Azdi declared him "matruk al-hadith".
وأخرجه أبو نعيم في "تاريخ أصبهان" 2/ 348 من طريق إبراهيم بن الوليد، عن غسان بن مالك، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Abu Nu'aym narrated it in "Tarikh Asbahan" (2/348) by way of Ibrahim bin al-Walid, from Ghassan bin Malik, with this same chain.
Grading: Its chain is "da'if jiddan" (extremely weak).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Concerning Ghassan bin Malik, Abu Hatim said that he is not strong and that objectionable material (nakarah) is evident in his hadith. Anbasah bin Abd al-Rahman is an "accused" narrator, and Anbasah is alone in narrating from his teacher "Allaq"; al-Azdi called him "dhahib al-hadith" (his hadith is worthless), al-Dhahabi called him "wahin" (very feeble) in "al-Kashif", and Ibn Hajr declared him "majhul" (unknown).
ويقال: إنه عبد الملك بن علاق، كما أشار إلى ذلك الحافظ المزِّي في "التهذيب"، وجهله الترمذي، وقال الأزدي: متروك الحديث.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): It is also said that his name is Abd al-Malik bin Allaq, as al-Hafiz al-Mizzi indicated in "al-Tahdhib"; Imam al-Tirmidhi called him "majhul", and al-Azdi declared him "matruk al-hadith".
وأخرجه أبو نعيم في "تاريخ أصبهان" 2/ 348 من طريق إبراهيم بن الوليد، عن غسان بن مالك، بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Abu Nu'aym narrated it in "Tarikh Asbahan" (2/348) by way of Ibrahim bin al-Walid, from Ghassan bin Malik, with this same chain.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 7248
