Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب الأحكام
Book of Judgments
وَلَدُ الزِّنَا شَرُّ الثَّلَاثَةِ
The child of fornication is the worst of the three
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 7234
اُردوEn
أخبرنا أحمد بن محمد بن سَلَمة العَنَزي، حدثنا عثمان بن سعيد الدارمي، حدثنا سليمان بن عبد الرحمن الدمشقي، حدثنا محمد بن مسروق، عن إسحاق بن الفُرات، عن ليث بن سعد، عن نافع، عن ابن عمر: أنَّ النبي ﷺ رَدَّ اليمينَ على طالب الحقِّ (4).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7057 - لا أعرف محمدا وأخشى أن لا يكون الحديث باطلا
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 7057 - لا أعرف محمدا وأخشى أن لا يكون الحديث باطلا
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) turned the oath back onto the one seeking the right (the claimant).
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(4) إسناده ضعيف، محمد بن مسروق - وهو الكندي الكوفي - مجهول الحال، قال ابن القطان: لا يعرف. وبه أعلَّه الذهبي في "تلخيصه"، وذكره ابن أبي حاتم في "الجرح والتعديل" 8/ 104، ولم يذكر فيه جرحًا ولا تعديلًا، وذكره ابن حبان في "ثقاته". ونقل الذهبي في ترجمة إسحاق بن الفرات من "ميزان الاعتدال": أنَّ عبد الحق الإشبيلي ضعَّف هذا الحديث بإسحاق بن الفرات، ثم ذكر الذهبي أن بعضهم تكلم فيه. وضعَّف الحافظ ابن حجر في "بلوغ المرام" إسناده.
Grading: Its chain is da'if (weak).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Muhammad bin Masruq (al-Kindi al-Kufi) is "majhul al-hal" (of unknown condition); Ibn al-Qattan said that he is not known. Imam al-Dhahabi declared it defective (weak) in the "Talkhis" for this very reason. Ibn Abi Hatim mentioned him in "al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil" (8/104) but stated no criticism or commendation, while Ibn Hibban included him in "al-Thiqat". Imam al-Dhahabi transmitted in "Mizan al-I'tidal", in the biography of Ishaq bin al-Furat, that Abd al-Haqq al-Ishbili declared this hadith weak because of Ishaq bin al-Furat; then al-Dhahabi mentioned that some had criticised him. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajr also declared its chain weak in "Bulugh al-Maram".
وأخرجه البيهقي 10/ 184 عن أبي عبد الله الحاكم بهذا الإسناد. وقال: تفرَّد به سليمان بن عبد الرحمن الدمشقي.
Reference / Source: Imam al-Bayhaqi narrated it (10/184) by way of Abu Abdullah al-Hakim, with this same chain, and said that Sulayman bin Abd al-Rahman al-Dimashqi is alone in narrating it.
وأخرجه الدارقطني (4490)، وتمام في "الفوائد" (459) و (460)، والبيهقي 10/ 184 وفي "المعرفة" (20086)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 55/ 245 من طرق عن سليمان بن عبد الرحمن، به. وقال البيهقي في "المعرفة": غريب وفي إسناده من يُجهل.
Details of the narration: It was recorded by Imam al-Daraqutni (4490), Tammam in "al-Fawa'id" (459, 460), al-Bayhaqi (10/184) and in "al-Ma'rifah" (20086), and Ibn Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (55/245), through various routes from Sulayman bin Abd al-Rahman.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Imam al-Bayhaqi said in "al-Ma'rifah" that this hadith is "gharib" and that its chain contains narrators who are majhul (unknown).
Grading: Its chain is da'if (weak).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Muhammad bin Masruq (al-Kindi al-Kufi) is "majhul al-hal" (of unknown condition); Ibn al-Qattan said that he is not known. Imam al-Dhahabi declared it defective (weak) in the "Talkhis" for this very reason. Ibn Abi Hatim mentioned him in "al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil" (8/104) but stated no criticism or commendation, while Ibn Hibban included him in "al-Thiqat". Imam al-Dhahabi transmitted in "Mizan al-I'tidal", in the biography of Ishaq bin al-Furat, that Abd al-Haqq al-Ishbili declared this hadith weak because of Ishaq bin al-Furat; then al-Dhahabi mentioned that some had criticised him. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajr also declared its chain weak in "Bulugh al-Maram".
وأخرجه البيهقي 10/ 184 عن أبي عبد الله الحاكم بهذا الإسناد. وقال: تفرَّد به سليمان بن عبد الرحمن الدمشقي.
Reference / Source: Imam al-Bayhaqi narrated it (10/184) by way of Abu Abdullah al-Hakim, with this same chain, and said that Sulayman bin Abd al-Rahman al-Dimashqi is alone in narrating it.
وأخرجه الدارقطني (4490)، وتمام في "الفوائد" (459) و (460)، والبيهقي 10/ 184 وفي "المعرفة" (20086)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 55/ 245 من طرق عن سليمان بن عبد الرحمن، به. وقال البيهقي في "المعرفة": غريب وفي إسناده من يُجهل.
Details of the narration: It was recorded by Imam al-Daraqutni (4490), Tammam in "al-Fawa'id" (459, 460), al-Bayhaqi (10/184) and in "al-Ma'rifah" (20086), and Ibn Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (55/245), through various routes from Sulayman bin Abd al-Rahman.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Imam al-Bayhaqi said in "al-Ma'rifah" that this hadith is "gharib" and that its chain contains narrators who are majhul (unknown).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 7234
