Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
مَذَمَّةُ حُبِّ الْمَالِ
Condemnation of the love of wealth
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5880
اُردوEn
قال ابن عمر: وحدثنا أبو بكر بن عبد الله بن أبي سَبْرة، عن المِسْوَر بن رِفاعة، عن عبد الله بن مَكْنَف. وحدثنا أفلحُ بن سعيد، عن سعيد (1) بن عبد الرحمن بن رُقَيش، عن أبي البَدّاح بن عاصم بن عَدِيّ: أَنَّ رسول الله ﷺ لما أراد الخُروجَ إلى بدر خَلّف عاصمَ بنَ عَدِيّ على قُباءٍ وأهل العاليَة، لشيءٍ بلغَه عنهم، فضَرَب له بسَهْمِه وأجرِه، فكان كمن شهدها (2).
Abu al-Baddah bin Asim bin Adi narrates from his father that when the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) intended to set out for Badr, he left Sayyiduna Asim bin Adi (may Allah be pleased with him) behind to watch over Quba and the people of al-Aliyah, because of something that had reached him (peace and blessings be upon him) about them. Then he (peace and blessings be upon him) allotted him a share (of the spoils) and a reward (in the Hereafter), so he was (in merit) just as if he had been present in the battle himself.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) في النسخ الخطية: عبد الله، وهو خطأ، والتصويب من "مغازي الواقدي" 1/ 160، و "طبقات ابن سعد" 3/ 432.
Note / Clarification: In the manuscripts it is written "Abdullah", which is an error. The correct name is taken from "Maghazi al-Waqidi" (1/ 160) and "Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd" (3/ 432).
(2) الإسناد الأول ضعيف جدًّا من أجل أبي بكر بن أبي سَبْرة، فقد اتهمه أحمد بوضع الحديث، ثم هو مرسل، وثاني الإسنادين رجالُه لا بأس بهم لكنه مرسل، غير أنه وإن كان كذلك هو من رواية أبي البدَّاح بن عاصم بن عدي يحكي فيها قصة لأبيه، وهو أعلمُ به، وابنُ عمر - وهو الواقدي - متكلَّم فيه.
Grading: The first chain is very weak (da'if jiddan) because of Abu Bakr bin Abi Sabrah, since Imam Ahmad accused him of fabricating hadith; moreover it is also "mursal". There is no harm in the men of the second chain, but it too is "mursal". However, it is the narration of Abu al-Baddah bin Asim bin Adi, who is relating a story about his father, and he knows more about him. And Ibn Umar (al-Waqidi) has been criticized.
وهو في "مغازي الواقدي" 1/ 160 بإسناده الثاني.
Reference / Source: It is in "Maghazi al-Waqidi" (1/ 160) with his second chain.
وهو في "طبقات ابن سعد" 3/ 432 عن محمد بن عمر الواقدي بإسناديه.
Reference / Source: It is in "Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd" (3/ 432) from Muhammad bin Umar al-Waqidi with both of his chains.
Note / Clarification: In the manuscripts it is written "Abdullah", which is an error. The correct name is taken from "Maghazi al-Waqidi" (1/ 160) and "Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd" (3/ 432).
(2) الإسناد الأول ضعيف جدًّا من أجل أبي بكر بن أبي سَبْرة، فقد اتهمه أحمد بوضع الحديث، ثم هو مرسل، وثاني الإسنادين رجالُه لا بأس بهم لكنه مرسل، غير أنه وإن كان كذلك هو من رواية أبي البدَّاح بن عاصم بن عدي يحكي فيها قصة لأبيه، وهو أعلمُ به، وابنُ عمر - وهو الواقدي - متكلَّم فيه.
Grading: The first chain is very weak (da'if jiddan) because of Abu Bakr bin Abi Sabrah, since Imam Ahmad accused him of fabricating hadith; moreover it is also "mursal". There is no harm in the men of the second chain, but it too is "mursal". However, it is the narration of Abu al-Baddah bin Asim bin Adi, who is relating a story about his father, and he knows more about him. And Ibn Umar (al-Waqidi) has been criticized.
وهو في "مغازي الواقدي" 1/ 160 بإسناده الثاني.
Reference / Source: It is in "Maghazi al-Waqidi" (1/ 160) with his second chain.
وهو في "طبقات ابن سعد" 3/ 432 عن محمد بن عمر الواقدي بإسناديه.
Reference / Source: It is in "Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd" (3/ 432) from Muhammad bin Umar al-Waqidi with both of his chains.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5880
