Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
لَا يَدْخُلُ قَلْبَ امْرِئٍ الْإِيمَانُ حَتَّى يُحِبَّكُمْ لِلَّهِ وَلِرَسُولِهِ
Faith does not enter a man's heart until he loves you for the sake of Allah and His Messenger
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5526
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو علي الحافظ، حدثنا محمد بن عبد الله البَيروتي، حدثنا محمد بن عُزيز، حدثني سَلامة بن رَوْح، عن عُقَيل بن خالد، عن ابن شهاب، قال: قال عبد الله بن ثَعلَبة: قال رسول الله ﷺ: "أَوْصاني اللهُ بذِي القُربَى، وأَمَرني أن أبدأ بالعباس" (1).
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5437 - سكت عنه الذهبي في التلخيص
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5437 - سكت عنه الذهبي في التلخيص
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Tha'labah (may Allah be pleased with him) that he said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Allah Almighty has enjoined me to treat my relatives well, and has commanded me to begin (it) with Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him)."
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) ضعيف، وما وقع هنا من ذكر عبد الله بن ثعلبة - وهو ابن أبي صُعَير العُذلاي، وهو صحابي صغير له رؤية - فوهمٌ، والمحفوظ فيه روايته عن ابن شهاب الزهري عن عبد الله بن كثير - هكذا غير منسوب - كذلك قال عبدُ الوهاب بن الحسن الكلابي في روايته عن محمد بن عبد الله البيروتي - وهو محمد بن عبد الله بن عبد السلام الملقّب بمكحول - عند ابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 26/ 343، وكذلك قال محمد بن محمد بن سليمان الباغَندي، عن محمد بن عُزيز عند ابن عساكر أيضًا 26/ 343. وعبد الله بن كثير هذا لم نتبيَّنه، إلا أن يكون هو عبد الله بن كثير الكناني المكي، أو يكون هو عبد الله بن كثير السَّهمي المكي، وكلاهما تابعي، فيكون الخبر على هذا مرسلًا، وتكون رواية الزهري عن هذا التابعي من رواية الأقران، والله تعالى أعلم.
Grading: (1) This narration is da'if.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The mention here of Abdullah bin Tha'labah (Ibn Abi Su'ayr al-'Udhri, a junior Companion who had the honour of seeing the Prophet) is an error (wahm). What is mahfuz is that al-Zuhri narrated it from "Abdullah bin Kathir" (without any attribution). This is what Abd al-Wahhab bin al-Hasan al-Kilabi said in his narration from Muhammad bin Abdullah al-Bayruti (Makhul), which is in Ibn 'Asakir (26/ 343), and likewise what Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Sulayman al-Baghandi said, narrating from Muhammad bin 'Uzayr, also in Ibn 'Asakir (26/ 343). Who this Abdullah bin Kathir is has not become clear to us, unless he is Abdullah bin Kathir al-Kinani al-Makki or Abdullah bin Kathir al-Sahmi al-Makki, both of whom are Tabi'is. In that case this report would be "mursal", and al-Zuhri's narration from this Tabi'i would be a case of "riwayat al-aqran" (narration among peers). And Allah knows best.
Grading: (1) This narration is da'if.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The mention here of Abdullah bin Tha'labah (Ibn Abi Su'ayr al-'Udhri, a junior Companion who had the honour of seeing the Prophet) is an error (wahm). What is mahfuz is that al-Zuhri narrated it from "Abdullah bin Kathir" (without any attribution). This is what Abd al-Wahhab bin al-Hasan al-Kilabi said in his narration from Muhammad bin Abdullah al-Bayruti (Makhul), which is in Ibn 'Asakir (26/ 343), and likewise what Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Sulayman al-Baghandi said, narrating from Muhammad bin 'Uzayr, also in Ibn 'Asakir (26/ 343). Who this Abdullah bin Kathir is has not become clear to us, unless he is Abdullah bin Kathir al-Kinani al-Makki or Abdullah bin Kathir al-Sahmi al-Makki, both of whom are Tabi'is. In that case this report would be "mursal", and al-Zuhri's narration from this Tabi'i would be a case of "riwayat al-aqran" (narration among peers). And Allah knows best.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5526
