Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
ذِكْرُ الْأَسْوَدِ بْنِ خَلَفِ بْنِ عَبْدِ يَغُوثَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ
Al-Aswad bin Khalaf bin Abd Yaghuth (may Allah be pleased with him)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5368
اُردوEn
قال (1): أخبرنا عبد الرزاق، أخبرنا مَعمَر، عن ابن خُثَيم، عن محمد بن الأسود بن خَلَف، عن أبيه: أنَّ النبي ﷺ أخذ حُسينًا فقبَّلَه، ثم أقبَل عليهم فقال: "إِنَّ الولدَ مَبْخَلَةٌ مَجْبَنَةٌ مَجْهَلَةٌ مَحْزَنة" (2).
It is narrated from Sayyiduna al-Aswad bin Khalaf (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) took Sayyiduna Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) in his lap and kissed him, then turned to the people and said: "Indeed, children are a cause of miserliness, cowardice, ignorance and grief (for a person)."
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) القائل هو إسحاق بن إبراهيم - وهو الدَّبري راوي "مصنف عبد الرزاق" عنه - فهو موصول بالإسناد السابق.
Note / Clarification: (1) The one saying this is "Ishaq bin Ibrahim" (al-Dabari), the narrator of "al-Musannaf" from Abd al-Razzaq. So it is "mawsul" (connected) with the preceding chain.
(2) حسن لغيره، وهذا إسناد محتمل للتحسين كسابقه، وقد حسَّنه الحافظ ابن حجر في "زوائد مسند البزار" (798)، وصحَّحه العراقي في "تخريج أحاديث الإحياء" 3/ 261.
Grading: (2) It is "hasan li-ghayrihi" (good due to supporting chains), and this chain, like the previous one, can possibly be graded hasan. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar graded it hasan in "Zawa'id Musnad al-Bazzar" (798), and al-Iraqi graded it sahih in "Takhrij Ahadith al-Ihya'" (3/ 261).
وأخرجه البزار (1891 - كشف الأستار)، وأبو القاسم البغوي في "معجم الصحابة" (126)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 13/ 213 من طرق عن عبد الرزاق، به. دون قوله: "محزنة".
Reference / Source: Al-Bazzar (1891, Kashf al-Astar), Abu al-Qasim al-Baghawi in "Mu'jam al-Sahabah" (126) and Ibn Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (13/ 213) recorded it through several routes from Abd al-Razzaq, but without the words "mahzanah" (a cause of grief).
وقالوا جميعًا في رواياتهم: أخذ حَسَنًا، فذكره الحَسَنَ بدل الحُسين، وأورد الذهبيُّ الخبر في "سير أعلام النبلاء" في ترجمة الحَسَن بن علي، فالأشبه في حديث معمر عن ابن خُثيم - وهو عبد الله بن عثمان بن خثيم - هذا هو ذكر الحَسَن لا الحُسين.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): All of them said in their narrations "akhadha Hasanan" (he took hold of Hasan), that is, they mentioned "al-Hasan" instead of al-Husayn. Al-Dhahabi cited this report in "Siyar A'lam al-Nubala'" in the biography of al-Hasan bin Ali.
Important point: So what seems most likely in this hadith of Ma'mar from Ibn Khuthaym (Abdullah bin Uthman bin Khuthaym) is that it mentions "al-Hasan", not al-Husayn.
على أنه تقدم عند المصنف برقم (4827) من حديث وُهيب بن خالد، عن ابن خُثيم، عن سعيد بن أبي راشد، عن يعلى بن مُنية ذكر الحَسن والحُسين كليهما أنه ﷺ ضمَّهما ثم ذكر الحديث دون قوله: مجهلة.
Note / Clarification: However, it has already passed with the author at number (4827), from the hadith of Wuhayb bin Khalid (from Ibn Khuthaym, from Sa'id bin Abi Rashid, from Ya'la bin Munyah), mentioning both al-Hasan and al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with them): that he (peace and blessings be upon him) embraced the two of them; then he mentioned the hadith, but without the words "majhalah" (a cause of ignorance).
Note / Clarification: (1) The one saying this is "Ishaq bin Ibrahim" (al-Dabari), the narrator of "al-Musannaf" from Abd al-Razzaq. So it is "mawsul" (connected) with the preceding chain.
(2) حسن لغيره، وهذا إسناد محتمل للتحسين كسابقه، وقد حسَّنه الحافظ ابن حجر في "زوائد مسند البزار" (798)، وصحَّحه العراقي في "تخريج أحاديث الإحياء" 3/ 261.
Grading: (2) It is "hasan li-ghayrihi" (good due to supporting chains), and this chain, like the previous one, can possibly be graded hasan. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar graded it hasan in "Zawa'id Musnad al-Bazzar" (798), and al-Iraqi graded it sahih in "Takhrij Ahadith al-Ihya'" (3/ 261).
وأخرجه البزار (1891 - كشف الأستار)، وأبو القاسم البغوي في "معجم الصحابة" (126)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 13/ 213 من طرق عن عبد الرزاق، به. دون قوله: "محزنة".
Reference / Source: Al-Bazzar (1891, Kashf al-Astar), Abu al-Qasim al-Baghawi in "Mu'jam al-Sahabah" (126) and Ibn Asakir in "Tarikh Dimashq" (13/ 213) recorded it through several routes from Abd al-Razzaq, but without the words "mahzanah" (a cause of grief).
وقالوا جميعًا في رواياتهم: أخذ حَسَنًا، فذكره الحَسَنَ بدل الحُسين، وأورد الذهبيُّ الخبر في "سير أعلام النبلاء" في ترجمة الحَسَن بن علي، فالأشبه في حديث معمر عن ابن خُثيم - وهو عبد الله بن عثمان بن خثيم - هذا هو ذكر الحَسَن لا الحُسين.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): All of them said in their narrations "akhadha Hasanan" (he took hold of Hasan), that is, they mentioned "al-Hasan" instead of al-Husayn. Al-Dhahabi cited this report in "Siyar A'lam al-Nubala'" in the biography of al-Hasan bin Ali.
Important point: So what seems most likely in this hadith of Ma'mar from Ibn Khuthaym (Abdullah bin Uthman bin Khuthaym) is that it mentions "al-Hasan", not al-Husayn.
على أنه تقدم عند المصنف برقم (4827) من حديث وُهيب بن خالد، عن ابن خُثيم، عن سعيد بن أبي راشد، عن يعلى بن مُنية ذكر الحَسن والحُسين كليهما أنه ﷺ ضمَّهما ثم ذكر الحديث دون قوله: مجهلة.
Note / Clarification: However, it has already passed with the author at number (4827), from the hadith of Wuhayb bin Khalid (from Ibn Khuthaym, from Sa'id bin Abi Rashid, from Ya'la bin Munyah), mentioning both al-Hasan and al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with them): that he (peace and blessings be upon him) embraced the two of them; then he mentioned the hadith, but without the words "majhalah" (a cause of ignorance).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5368
