Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
وَفَاةُ أُسَيْدِ بْنِ حُضَيْرٍ سَنَةَ عِشْرِينَ
Usayd bin Hudayr (may Allah be pleased with him) died in 20 AH
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5339
اُردوEn
أخبرنا الشيخ أبو بكر أحمد بن إسحاق، حدثنا إسماعيل بن قُتيبة، حدثنا محمد بن عبد الله بن نُمير، قال: مات أبو يحيى أُسَيد بن حُضَير سنة عشرين، وكان قد شهد العَقَبة، ثم كان نَقيبًا، صلَّى عليه عمرُ بن الخطاب بالمدينة، ودُفن بالبقيع، وله كنيتان أبو يحيى وأبو حُصَين (2)، وأبوه حُضَيرُ الكتائبِ (3)، ولم يُعقِبْ أُسَيدٌ (4).
Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Numayr said: Abu Yahya Usayd bin Hudayr (may Allah be pleased with him) died in the year 20 AH. He had taken part in the Pledge of al-Aqabah and was then appointed a naqib (chief representative). Sayyiduna Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) led his funeral prayer in Madinah, and he was buried in al-Baqi'. He had two kunyahs: Abu Yahya and Abu Husayn. His father's title was "Hudayr al-Kata'ib" (Hudayr of the battalions), and Usayd had no offspring.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) وقع في المطبوع: أبو حضير، وهو قول رُوي في كنية أُسيد بن حُضير، لكن ما وقع في نسخنا الخطية هو ما ذكره ابن الحذاء وأبو القاسم البغوي والطبري فيما نقله عنهم الحافظ مغلطاي في "إكمال تهذيب الكمال" 2/ 226، وذكره كذلك ابن منده في "فتح الباب في الكنى والألقاب" (2304)، والذهبي في "المقتنى" (1615)، لكن قال الذهبي: أبو حضير أشبه.
Note / Clarification: (2) In the printed edition it is "Abu Hudayr", which is one view narrated about the kunyah of Usayd bin Hudayr. But what is in our manuscripts is what Ibn al-Hadhdha', Abu al-Qasim al-Baghawi and al-Tabari mentioned (as al-Hafiz Mughultay quoted from them in "Ikmal Tahdhib al-Kamal" 2/ 226). Ibn Mandah also mentioned it in "Fath al-Bab" (2304) and al-Dhahabi in "al-Muqtana" (1615), but al-Dhahabi said: "Abu Hudayr seems more likely."
(3) وقع في (ز) و (ب): الكاتب، والمثبت من (ص) و (م) هو الموافق لما في كتب السيرة والتراجم والتاريخ التي ذكرت حُضيرًا أبا أسيد، "كالمغازي" للواقدي 1/ 303، و "طبقات ابن سعد" 3/ 558.
Note / Clarification: (3) In manuscripts (Z) and (B) it is "al-Katib", while what has been adopted in the text is from (S) and (M), and this agrees with the books of sirah, biographies and history that mention Hudayr (the father of Usayd), such as "al-Maghazi" of al-Waqidi (1/ 303) and "Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd" (3/ 558).
(4) يعكِّر على قوله: لم يُعقب، ما ثبت في "مسند أحمد" 18/ (11766)، و "صحيح مسلم" (796) عن أبي سعيد الخدري من ذكر أُسَيدٍ ابنه يحيى في خبرٍ ذكره. فلعلَّ يحيى هذا مات ولم يُعقب فلم يبق لأُسيد بعده عَقِبٌ، والله أعلم.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): (4) The statement that "he left no descendants (lam yu'qib)" is problematized by what is established in "Musnad Ahmad" (18/ 11766) and "Sahih Muslim" (796) from Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, where Usayd mentions his son "Yahya" in a report he narrated.
Important point: Perhaps this Yahya died without leaving descendants, so that no line of Usayd remained after him, and Allah knows best.
Note / Clarification: (2) In the printed edition it is "Abu Hudayr", which is one view narrated about the kunyah of Usayd bin Hudayr. But what is in our manuscripts is what Ibn al-Hadhdha', Abu al-Qasim al-Baghawi and al-Tabari mentioned (as al-Hafiz Mughultay quoted from them in "Ikmal Tahdhib al-Kamal" 2/ 226). Ibn Mandah also mentioned it in "Fath al-Bab" (2304) and al-Dhahabi in "al-Muqtana" (1615), but al-Dhahabi said: "Abu Hudayr seems more likely."
(3) وقع في (ز) و (ب): الكاتب، والمثبت من (ص) و (م) هو الموافق لما في كتب السيرة والتراجم والتاريخ التي ذكرت حُضيرًا أبا أسيد، "كالمغازي" للواقدي 1/ 303، و "طبقات ابن سعد" 3/ 558.
Note / Clarification: (3) In manuscripts (Z) and (B) it is "al-Katib", while what has been adopted in the text is from (S) and (M), and this agrees with the books of sirah, biographies and history that mention Hudayr (the father of Usayd), such as "al-Maghazi" of al-Waqidi (1/ 303) and "Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd" (3/ 558).
(4) يعكِّر على قوله: لم يُعقب، ما ثبت في "مسند أحمد" 18/ (11766)، و "صحيح مسلم" (796) عن أبي سعيد الخدري من ذكر أُسَيدٍ ابنه يحيى في خبرٍ ذكره. فلعلَّ يحيى هذا مات ولم يُعقب فلم يبق لأُسيد بعده عَقِبٌ، والله أعلم.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): (4) The statement that "he left no descendants (lam yu'qib)" is problematized by what is established in "Musnad Ahmad" (18/ 11766) and "Sahih Muslim" (796) from Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, where Usayd mentions his son "Yahya" in a report he narrated.
Important point: Perhaps this Yahya died without leaving descendants, so that no line of Usayd remained after him, and Allah knows best.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5339
