Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
ذِكْرُ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الْمُطَّلِبِ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ
Sa'id bin al-Harith bin Abd al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with him)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5155
اُردوEn
قرأتُ في "تاريخ" أحمد بن عبد الله البَرْقي، حدثنا أبو عُبيد القاسم بن سَلَّام، عن هشام بن الكَلْبي في قول النبي ﷺ: "وإن أول دَمٍ أَضَعُه دمُ ربيعة بن الحارث"، كان مُسترضَعًا في بني لَيثٍ فقَتَلَتْه هُذَيلٌ (1). قال هشامٌ: لم يُقتَل ربيعةُ، فإنه عاشَ بعد النبيِّ ﷺ إلى خِلافة عمرَ، والذي قَتَلتْه هُذَيلٌ غيرُه. ذكرُ مناقب سعيد بن الحارث بن عبد المُطَّلب ﵁ -
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5078 - حذفه الذهبي من التلخيص لضعفه
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5078 - حذفه الذهبي من التلخيص لضعفه
Hisham bin al-Kalbi says, concerning the saying of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), "And the first blood that I abolish (as blood-revenge from the time of the Jahiliyyah) is the blood of Rabi'ah bin al-Harith," that his son was being nursed among Banu Layth and was killed by Banu Hudhayl. Hisham says: Rabi'ah was not killed; rather, he lived after the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) until the caliphate of Sayyiduna Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). The one who was killed at the hands of Hudhayl was his son.
Mention of the virtues of Sayyiduna Sa'id bin al-Harith bin Abd al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with him):
Mention of the virtues of Sayyiduna Sa'id bin al-Harith bin Abd al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with him):
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) هشام بن الكلبي: هو هشام بن محمد بن السائب الكلبي، وهو متروك، وخبره هذا مُعضَل، لكن صحَّ الخبر موصولًا من حديث جابر بن عبد الله عند مسلم (1218)، وأبي داود (1905)، وابن ماجه (3074)، وابن حبان (1457) و (3944)، وقد وقع في أكثر الروايات: "دم ابن ربيعة بن الحارث"، وفي بعضها كما وقع هنا: "دم ربيعة".
Grading: (1) Hisham bin al-Kalbi (Hisham bin Muhammad bin al-Sa'ib al-Kalbi) is a "matruk" narrator, and this report of his is "mu'dal" (with two or more consecutive narrators missing).
Important point: However, this report is established as sahih with a "mawsul" (connected) chain from the hadith of Jabir bin 'Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him), found in Sahih Muslim (1218), Abu Dawud (1905), Ibn Majah (3074) and Ibn Hibban (1457, 3944).
Details of the narration: In most narrations the words are "the blood of the son of Rabi'ah bin al-Harith", while in some narrations (as here) the words are "the blood of Rabi'ah".
قال الطبراني في ذيل "المُذيَّل" كما في "منتخبه" لعُريب القرطبي 11/ 528: إنما قال النبي ﷺ: "إِنَّ أول دم أضعُه دم ربيعة بن الحارث" وربيعة حيٌّ، لأنَّ ذلك كان دمًا لربيعة الطلبُ به في الجاهلية، وذلك أنَّ ابنًا لربيعة صغيرًا كان مسترضَعًا في بني ليث بن بكر، وكان بين هذيل وبين ليث بن بكر حرب، فخرج ابن ربيعة بن الحارث، وهو طفل يَحبُو أمام البيوت، فرَمَتْه هُذيلٌ بحجرٍ، فأصابه الحجر فرضخ رأسه، فجاء الإسلام قبل أن يثأر ربيعة بن الحارث بدم ابنه، فأبطل النبي ﷺ الطلبَ بذلك الدم، فلم يجعل لربيعة السبيل على قاتل ابنه …
Note / Clarification: Al-Tabarani said in the supplement (dhayl) to "al-Mudhayyal" (as in the "Muntakhab" of 'Arib al-Qurtubi [11/ 528]): The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The first blood that I abolish is the blood of Rabi'ah bin al-Harith", although Rabi'ah was alive at that time. This means it was blood for which Rabi'ah had the right to seek retaliation in the Jahiliyyah. What happened was that a young son of Rabi'ah had been sent to Banu Layth bin Bakr to be nursed. There was war between Banu Hudhayl and Banu Layth. The son of Rabi'ah bin al-Harith, who was still an infant crawling in front of the houses, came out, and Hudhayl struck him with a stone which crushed his head. Islam came before Rabi'ah could avenge his son's blood, so the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) declared the claim for that blood void and left Rabi'ah no way (of retaliation) against his son's killer.
قلنا: فزال بذلك الإشكال الذي استشكله هشام بن الكلبي بإثره.
Important point: We say: with this explanation the difficulty that Hisham bin al-Kalbi encountered is removed.
Grading: (1) Hisham bin al-Kalbi (Hisham bin Muhammad bin al-Sa'ib al-Kalbi) is a "matruk" narrator, and this report of his is "mu'dal" (with two or more consecutive narrators missing).
Important point: However, this report is established as sahih with a "mawsul" (connected) chain from the hadith of Jabir bin 'Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him), found in Sahih Muslim (1218), Abu Dawud (1905), Ibn Majah (3074) and Ibn Hibban (1457, 3944).
Details of the narration: In most narrations the words are "the blood of the son of Rabi'ah bin al-Harith", while in some narrations (as here) the words are "the blood of Rabi'ah".
قال الطبراني في ذيل "المُذيَّل" كما في "منتخبه" لعُريب القرطبي 11/ 528: إنما قال النبي ﷺ: "إِنَّ أول دم أضعُه دم ربيعة بن الحارث" وربيعة حيٌّ، لأنَّ ذلك كان دمًا لربيعة الطلبُ به في الجاهلية، وذلك أنَّ ابنًا لربيعة صغيرًا كان مسترضَعًا في بني ليث بن بكر، وكان بين هذيل وبين ليث بن بكر حرب، فخرج ابن ربيعة بن الحارث، وهو طفل يَحبُو أمام البيوت، فرَمَتْه هُذيلٌ بحجرٍ، فأصابه الحجر فرضخ رأسه، فجاء الإسلام قبل أن يثأر ربيعة بن الحارث بدم ابنه، فأبطل النبي ﷺ الطلبَ بذلك الدم، فلم يجعل لربيعة السبيل على قاتل ابنه …
Note / Clarification: Al-Tabarani said in the supplement (dhayl) to "al-Mudhayyal" (as in the "Muntakhab" of 'Arib al-Qurtubi [11/ 528]): The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The first blood that I abolish is the blood of Rabi'ah bin al-Harith", although Rabi'ah was alive at that time. This means it was blood for which Rabi'ah had the right to seek retaliation in the Jahiliyyah. What happened was that a young son of Rabi'ah had been sent to Banu Layth bin Bakr to be nursed. There was war between Banu Hudhayl and Banu Layth. The son of Rabi'ah bin al-Harith, who was still an infant crawling in front of the houses, came out, and Hudhayl struck him with a stone which crushed his head. Islam came before Rabi'ah could avenge his son's blood, so the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) declared the claim for that blood void and left Rabi'ah no way (of retaliation) against his son's killer.
قلنا: فزال بذلك الإشكال الذي استشكله هشام بن الكلبي بإثره.
Important point: We say: with this explanation the difficulty that Hisham bin al-Kalbi encountered is removed.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5155
