Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
تَزْوِيجُ النَّبِيِّ نَوْفَلَ بْنَ الْحَارِثِ بِرَهْنِ دِرْعِهِ
The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) arranging the marriage of Nawfal bin al-Harith (may Allah be pleased with him) by pledging his armour
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5152
اُردوEn
أخبرنا أبو جعفر البغدادي، حدثنا يحيى بن عثمان بن صالح، حدثنا حَسّان بن عبد الله، حدثنا ابن لَهِيعة، حدثنا يونس بن يزيد، حدثنا ابن (4) إسحاق، عن سعيد بن الحارث، عن جدِّه نوفل بن الحارث بن عبد المطّلب: أنه استعانَ رسولَ الله ﷺ في التَّزويج، فأنكَحَه امرأةً، فالتمَسَ شيئًا فلم يَجِدْه، فبعثَ رسولُ الله ﷺ أبا رافع وأبا أيوب بدِرْعِه فرَهَنَاهُ عند رجلٍ من اليهود بثلاثين صاعًا من شَعير، فدفَعَه رسولُ الله ﷺ، فَطَعِمْنا منه نِصفَ سنةٍ، ثم كِلْناهُ فَوَجدْناهُ كما أدخَلْناه، قال نَوفلٌ: فذكرتُ لرسولِ الله ﷺ، فقال: "لو لم تَكِلْهُ لأكَلْتَ منه ما عِشْتَ" (1). وأما رَبيعةُ وعُبيدةُ بن الحارث بن عبد المطّلب والطُّفيلُ بن الحارث بن عبد المطّلب وحُصينُ بن الحارث، فإنهم قُتِلوا بين يدي رسول الله ﷺ.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5075 - سكت عنه الذهبي في التلخيص
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 5075 - سكت عنه الذهبي في التلخيص
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Nawfal bin al-Harith bin Abd al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with him) that he sought the help of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) in getting married, so he (peace and blessings be upon him) married him to a woman. When he looked for something (for the dowry or expenses), he found nothing. So the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) sent his coat of mail with Sayyiduna Abu Rafi' and Sayyiduna Abu Ayyub (may Allah be pleased with them both), and they pawned it with a Jewish man for thirty sa' of barley. Then the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) gave that barley to them. We ate from it for half a year; then, when we measured it, we found it was just as much as it had been at the start. Nawfal (may Allah be pleased with him) says: I mentioned this to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and he (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Had you not measured it, you would have kept eating from it for as long as you lived." As for Rabi'ah, Ubaydah, Tufayl and Husayn (the sons of al-Harith bin Abd al-Muttalib), they were martyred in front of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him).
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(4) تحرَّف في نسخنا الخطية إلى: أبو إسحاق، وهو خطأ صوَّبناه من "دلائل النبوة" للبيهقي من روايته لهذا الخبر عن أبي عبد الله الحاكم، حيث أورده ابن كثير في "البداية والنهاية" 8/ 664، وأشار محققه إلى اتفاق نُسخ "البداية والنهاية" الخطية على ذكر ابن إسحاق، وقد وقع في مطبوع "دلائل النبوة" 6/ 114: أبو إسحاق، ولا نظنُّه إلّا ذهولًا من محقق "الدلائل" عما في نسخه الخطية، فإنَّ ما عند ابن كثير نقلًا عن "الدلائل" هو العُمدة، ويؤيده رواية الطبراني بهذه السلسلة عدةَ أخبار إلى ابن إسحاق: هو محمد بن إسحاق المُطّلبي مولاهم صاحبُ السيرة.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): (4) In our manuscripts this name was corrupted into "Abu Ishaq", which is a mistake. We corrected it from al-Bayhaqi's "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah", where he narrated this report from Abu 'Abdullah al-Hakim. Ibn Kathir cited it in "al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah" [8/ 664], and its editor pointed out that all the manuscripts of al-Bidayah have "Ibn Ishaq".
Note / Clarification: In the printed edition of "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" [6/ 114] "Abu Ishaq" has been printed; we think this is an oversight by the editor of "al-Dala'il" regarding his manuscripts, because Ibn Kathir's quotation from "al-Dala'il" is more reliable (the main authority). This is also supported by the fact that al-Tabarani transmitted several reports up to "Ibn Ishaq" with this same chain (series). "Ibn Ishaq" is "Muhammad bin Ishaq al-Muttalibi" (their freed slave), the author of the Sirah.
(1) إسناده ضعيف لضعف ابن لَهِيعة - وهو عبد الله بن لَهِيعة المصري - فقد ساء حفظه بعد احتراق كُتُبه، وسعيد بن الحارث لا يُعرف، وجَزْمُ ابن حجر في "إتحاف المهرة" (17215) بأنَّ له صُحبةً غير مُسلَّم له، إذ ليس له فيه سَلَفٌ، وقد ذكره ابن سعد في "الطبقات" 4/ 52 في أولاد الحارث بن نوفل، وأنَّ أمَّه أم ولد، ويبعُد إدراكه لجده نوفل، والله أعلم. ثم إنَّ ابن إسحاق مدلِّس وقد عنعن.
Grading: (1) Its chain is "weak".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is the weakness of "Ibn Lahi'ah" ('Abdullah bin Lahi'ah al-Misri), because his memory deteriorated after his books were burned. Also "Sa'id bin al-Harith" is not known. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajr's decisive statement in "Ithaf al-Maharah" (17215) that he was a Companion is not accepted, because he has no predecessor (salaf) for it. Ibn Sa'd mentioned him in "al-Tabaqat" [4/ 52] among the children of al-Harith bin Nawfal and said that his mother was an "umm walad"; so it is unlikely that he met his grandfather "Nawfal". And Allah knows best. Moreover, Ibn Ishaq is a "mudallis" and he has narrated with "'an'anah".
وأخرجه البيهقي في "دلائل النبوة" 6/ 114 عن أبي عبد الله الحاكم، بهذا الإسناد. لكن جاء عنده تقييد سعيد بن الحارث بابن عكرمة، وهو غريب!
Reference / Source: Al-Bayhaqi narrated it in "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" [6/ 114] from Abu 'Abdullah al-Hakim with this same chain.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): But in his version Sa'id bin al-Harith is qualified as "Ibn 'Ikrimah", and this is "strange" (gharib)!
Technical note / Defect ('illah): (4) In our manuscripts this name was corrupted into "Abu Ishaq", which is a mistake. We corrected it from al-Bayhaqi's "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah", where he narrated this report from Abu 'Abdullah al-Hakim. Ibn Kathir cited it in "al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah" [8/ 664], and its editor pointed out that all the manuscripts of al-Bidayah have "Ibn Ishaq".
Note / Clarification: In the printed edition of "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" [6/ 114] "Abu Ishaq" has been printed; we think this is an oversight by the editor of "al-Dala'il" regarding his manuscripts, because Ibn Kathir's quotation from "al-Dala'il" is more reliable (the main authority). This is also supported by the fact that al-Tabarani transmitted several reports up to "Ibn Ishaq" with this same chain (series). "Ibn Ishaq" is "Muhammad bin Ishaq al-Muttalibi" (their freed slave), the author of the Sirah.
(1) إسناده ضعيف لضعف ابن لَهِيعة - وهو عبد الله بن لَهِيعة المصري - فقد ساء حفظه بعد احتراق كُتُبه، وسعيد بن الحارث لا يُعرف، وجَزْمُ ابن حجر في "إتحاف المهرة" (17215) بأنَّ له صُحبةً غير مُسلَّم له، إذ ليس له فيه سَلَفٌ، وقد ذكره ابن سعد في "الطبقات" 4/ 52 في أولاد الحارث بن نوفل، وأنَّ أمَّه أم ولد، ويبعُد إدراكه لجده نوفل، والله أعلم. ثم إنَّ ابن إسحاق مدلِّس وقد عنعن.
Grading: (1) Its chain is "weak".
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is the weakness of "Ibn Lahi'ah" ('Abdullah bin Lahi'ah al-Misri), because his memory deteriorated after his books were burned. Also "Sa'id bin al-Harith" is not known. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajr's decisive statement in "Ithaf al-Maharah" (17215) that he was a Companion is not accepted, because he has no predecessor (salaf) for it. Ibn Sa'd mentioned him in "al-Tabaqat" [4/ 52] among the children of al-Harith bin Nawfal and said that his mother was an "umm walad"; so it is unlikely that he met his grandfather "Nawfal". And Allah knows best. Moreover, Ibn Ishaq is a "mudallis" and he has narrated with "'an'anah".
وأخرجه البيهقي في "دلائل النبوة" 6/ 114 عن أبي عبد الله الحاكم، بهذا الإسناد. لكن جاء عنده تقييد سعيد بن الحارث بابن عكرمة، وهو غريب!
Reference / Source: Al-Bayhaqi narrated it in "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" [6/ 114] from Abu 'Abdullah al-Hakim with this same chain.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): But in his version Sa'id bin al-Harith is qualified as "Ibn 'Ikrimah", and this is "strange" (gharib)!
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5152
