Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
أَوَّلُ مَنْ يُعَانِقُهُ الْحَقُّ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ عُمَرُ .
The first whom the Truth will embrace on the Day of Resurrection is Umar (may Allah be pleased with him)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4541
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو محمد أحمد بن عبد الله المُزَني، حدثنا محمد بن عبد الله الحضرمي، حدثنا عبد الله بن عمر بن أبان، حدثنا عبد الله بن خراش، أخبرنا العوّام بن حَوشَب، عن سعيد بن جُبَير، عن ابن عبّاس قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ: "لما أسلمَ عمرُ أتاني جبريلُ ﵇، فقال: قد استبشَرَ أهل السماء بإسلامِ عُمرَ" (1).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4491 - عبد الله بن خراش ضعفه الدارقطني
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4491 - عبد الله بن خراش ضعفه الدارقطني
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "When Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) accepted Islam, Jibril (peace be upon him) came to me and said: Indeed, the people of the heaven are rejoicing at Umar's (may Allah be pleased with him) acceptance of Islam."
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) إسناده ضعيف جدًّا من أجل عبد الله بن خراش، فهو متَّفقٌ على ضعفه، كما قال البُوصيري في "مصباح الزجاجة" (38)، خلافًا لما يُوهمه صنيع الذهبي في "تلخيصه" حيث اقتصر على ذكر تضعيف الدارقطني له بل قد اتهمه الساجيُّ بوضع الحديث وكذَّبه ابن عمار.
Grading: Its chain is very weak (da'if jiddan).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is the narrator "Abd Allah bin Khirash", since he is weak by agreement, as al-Busiri said in "Misbah al-Zujajah" (no. 38).
Important point: This fact is contrary to the impression given by al-Hafiz al-Dhahabi's treatment in "Talkhis al-Mustadrak", where he limited himself to mentioning al-Daraqutni's weakening of him (which makes the weakness seem lighter), whereas in fact al-Saji accused him (Abd Allah bin Khirash) of fabricating hadith and Ibn Ammar called him a liar.
هذا ولا يحفظ ذكر سعيد بن جُبَير في هذا الخبر، فإنَّ جميع من رواه عن عبد الله عن عمر بن أبان، وكذا مَن رواه عن عبد الله بن خراش، إنما ذكروا مجاهد بن جَبْر مكانه، فهو المحفوظ.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Furthermore, the mention of (the Successor) Sa'id bin Jubayr in this narration is not preserved (i.e. this name came in by mistake).
Details of the narration: This is because all those who narrated it from Abd Allah, from Umar bin Aban, and likewise those who narrated it from Abd Allah bin Khirash, all mentioned Mujahid bin Jabr in place of Sa'id.
Important point: Therefore the narration with Mujahid bin Jabr (rather than Sa'id bin Jubayr) is the preserved one.
وأخرجه ابن ماجه (103) عن إسماعيل بن محمد الطَّلْحي، وابن حبان (6883) من طريق محمد بن عُقبة السدوسي، كلاهما عن عبد الله بن خراش، عن عمه العوّام بن حوشب، عن مجاهد، عن ابن عبّاس.
Reference / Source: Ibn Majah narrated it (no. 103) from Isma'il bin Muhammad al-Talhi, and Ibn Hibban (no. 6883) via Muhammad bin Uqbah al-Sadusi; both of them (Isma'il and Muhammad) narrate it from Abd Allah bin Khirash, from his paternal uncle al-Awwam bin Hawshab, from Mujahid, from Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both).
Grading: Its chain is very weak (da'if jiddan).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is the narrator "Abd Allah bin Khirash", since he is weak by agreement, as al-Busiri said in "Misbah al-Zujajah" (no. 38).
Important point: This fact is contrary to the impression given by al-Hafiz al-Dhahabi's treatment in "Talkhis al-Mustadrak", where he limited himself to mentioning al-Daraqutni's weakening of him (which makes the weakness seem lighter), whereas in fact al-Saji accused him (Abd Allah bin Khirash) of fabricating hadith and Ibn Ammar called him a liar.
هذا ولا يحفظ ذكر سعيد بن جُبَير في هذا الخبر، فإنَّ جميع من رواه عن عبد الله عن عمر بن أبان، وكذا مَن رواه عن عبد الله بن خراش، إنما ذكروا مجاهد بن جَبْر مكانه، فهو المحفوظ.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Furthermore, the mention of (the Successor) Sa'id bin Jubayr in this narration is not preserved (i.e. this name came in by mistake).
Details of the narration: This is because all those who narrated it from Abd Allah, from Umar bin Aban, and likewise those who narrated it from Abd Allah bin Khirash, all mentioned Mujahid bin Jabr in place of Sa'id.
Important point: Therefore the narration with Mujahid bin Jabr (rather than Sa'id bin Jubayr) is the preserved one.
وأخرجه ابن ماجه (103) عن إسماعيل بن محمد الطَّلْحي، وابن حبان (6883) من طريق محمد بن عُقبة السدوسي، كلاهما عن عبد الله بن خراش، عن عمه العوّام بن حوشب، عن مجاهد، عن ابن عبّاس.
Reference / Source: Ibn Majah narrated it (no. 103) from Isma'il bin Muhammad al-Talhi, and Ibn Hibban (no. 6883) via Muhammad bin Uqbah al-Sadusi; both of them (Isma'il and Muhammad) narrate it from Abd Allah bin Khirash, from his paternal uncle al-Awwam bin Hawshab, from Mujahid, from Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4541
