Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب المغازي والسرايا
Book of Military Expeditions and Raids
كَرَاهِيَةُ النِّيَاحَةِ عَلَى الْمَوْتَى
The disapproval of wailing over the dead
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4401
اُردوEn
حدَّثنا أبو محمد أحمد بن عبد الله المُزَني، حدَّثنا محمد بن عبد الله الحَضْرمي، حدَّثنا سعيد بن عمرو الأَشعَثِي، حدَّثنا عَبْثَر، عن حُصَين، عن الشَّعْبي، عن النُّعمان بن بَشير قال: أُغمي على عبد الله بن رَوَاحة فجعلتْ أختُه عَمْرةُ تَبكي: وا أُخيّاهُ، وا كذا وا كذا، تَعُدُّ عليه، فقال حينَ أفاقَ: ما قُلتِ شيئًا إِلَّا قيل لي: آنتَ كذلكَ؟ (2) صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه!
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4353 - صحيح
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4353 - صحيح
It is narrated from Sayyiduna al-Nu'man bin Bashir (may Allah be pleased with him) that Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Rawahah (may Allah be pleased with him) fell unconscious, and his sister Amrah began to weep and to lament, listing his qualities: "Alas, my brother! Alas, you were such and such!" When he came to, he said: "For every quality you mentioned, I was questioned (by the angels): 'Are you really like that?'"
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
This hadith has an authentic (sahih) chain of narration, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) إسناده صحيح. عَبثَر: هو ابن القاسم، وحُصين: هو ابن عبد الرحمن السُّلَمي، والشَّعبي: هو عامر بن شَراحيل.
Grading: Its chain is sahih.
Technical note / Identification of the narrator: "Abthar" is Ibn al-Qasim, "Husayn" is Ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, and "al-Sha'bi" is Amir bin Sharahil.
وأخرجه البخاريّ (4268) عن قتيبة بن سعيد عن عَبثَر بن القاسم، بهذا الإسناد. وزاد: فلما مات لم تَبكِ عليه. فاستدراك الحاكم له ذهولٌ منه.
Reference / Source: Al-Bukhari (4268) narrated it from Qutaybah bin Sa'id, from Abthar bin al-Qasim, with this same chain. And he added: "So when he died, she (A'ishah (may Allah be pleased with her)) did not weep over him."
Technical note / Istidrak: So al-Hakim's adding it as something (al-Bukhari and Muslim) missed is an oversight on his part.
وأخرجه البخاريّ أيضًا (4267) من طريق محمد بن فضيل، عن حُصين، به. دون ذكر الزيادة المشار إليها. وقد خالفَ عَبْثرًا وابنَ فُضيل في إسناده سفيانُ بنُ عيينة عند عبد الرزاق (6697) فرواه عن حُصين، عن الشَّعبي، مرسلًا!!
Reference / Source: Al-Bukhari (4267) also narrated it by way of Muhammad bin Fudayl, from Husayn, but without the addition mentioned.
Technical note / Variation in the chain: Sufyan bin Uyaynah (in Abd al-Razzaq 6697) contradicted Abthar and Ibn Fudayl, narrating it from Husayn, from al-Sha'bi "mursal"!!
وأخرج ابن سعد نحوه في "طبقاته" 3/ 490 من مرسل أبي عمران الجَوْنِي، إلّا أنه ذكر فيه أنَّ النائحة كانت أمّه لا أخته. ورجاله ثقات، لكن خطَّأ الحافظُ في "الفتح" 12/ 485 ذِكرَ أمّه، وقال: فلو كانت أمُّه تُسمَّى عمرة لَجوّزتُ وقوعَ ذلك لهما.
Reference / Source: Ibn Sa'd (3/ 490) narrated something similar as a "mursal" narration of Abu Imran al-Jawni, except that he mentions in it that the woman who wailed was his "mother", not his sister. Its narrators are thiqah.
Technical note / Verification of the text: But al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar declared the mention of "mother" a mistake in "al-Fath" (12/ 485) and said: "If his mother had been named Amrah, I would have considered it possible that this happened to both of them (mother and sister)."
Grading: Its chain is sahih.
Technical note / Identification of the narrator: "Abthar" is Ibn al-Qasim, "Husayn" is Ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, and "al-Sha'bi" is Amir bin Sharahil.
وأخرجه البخاريّ (4268) عن قتيبة بن سعيد عن عَبثَر بن القاسم، بهذا الإسناد. وزاد: فلما مات لم تَبكِ عليه. فاستدراك الحاكم له ذهولٌ منه.
Reference / Source: Al-Bukhari (4268) narrated it from Qutaybah bin Sa'id, from Abthar bin al-Qasim, with this same chain. And he added: "So when he died, she (A'ishah (may Allah be pleased with her)) did not weep over him."
Technical note / Istidrak: So al-Hakim's adding it as something (al-Bukhari and Muslim) missed is an oversight on his part.
وأخرجه البخاريّ أيضًا (4267) من طريق محمد بن فضيل، عن حُصين، به. دون ذكر الزيادة المشار إليها. وقد خالفَ عَبْثرًا وابنَ فُضيل في إسناده سفيانُ بنُ عيينة عند عبد الرزاق (6697) فرواه عن حُصين، عن الشَّعبي، مرسلًا!!
Reference / Source: Al-Bukhari (4267) also narrated it by way of Muhammad bin Fudayl, from Husayn, but without the addition mentioned.
Technical note / Variation in the chain: Sufyan bin Uyaynah (in Abd al-Razzaq 6697) contradicted Abthar and Ibn Fudayl, narrating it from Husayn, from al-Sha'bi "mursal"!!
وأخرج ابن سعد نحوه في "طبقاته" 3/ 490 من مرسل أبي عمران الجَوْنِي، إلّا أنه ذكر فيه أنَّ النائحة كانت أمّه لا أخته. ورجاله ثقات، لكن خطَّأ الحافظُ في "الفتح" 12/ 485 ذِكرَ أمّه، وقال: فلو كانت أمُّه تُسمَّى عمرة لَجوّزتُ وقوعَ ذلك لهما.
Reference / Source: Ibn Sa'd (3/ 490) narrated something similar as a "mursal" narration of Abu Imran al-Jawni, except that he mentions in it that the woman who wailed was his "mother", not his sister. Its narrators are thiqah.
Technical note / Verification of the text: But al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar declared the mention of "mother" a mistake in "al-Fath" (12/ 485) and said: "If his mother had been named Amrah, I would have considered it possible that this happened to both of them (mother and sister)."
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4401
