Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب المغازي والسرايا
Book of Military Expeditions and Raids
كَانَ يَوْمَ بَدْرٍ فَرَسَانِ ، فَرَسٌ لِلزُّبَيْرِ وَفَرَسٌ لِلْمِقْدَادِ
On the day of Badr there were two horses, one belonging to al-Zubayr and one to al-Miqdad
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4344
اُردوEn
أخبرنا عبد الله بن إسحاق البَغَوي، حدثنا إسماعيل بن إسحاق القاضي، حدثنا أبو ثابت، حدثني ابن وهب، أخبرني أبو صخر، عن أبي معاوية البجلي، عن سعيد بن جُبير، عن ابن عباس: أنَّ علي بن أبي طالب قال له: ما كان مَعَنا إِلَّا فَرَسان: فَرسٌ للزبير، وفَرسٌ للمقداد بن الأسود؛ يعني: يوم بدر (1)
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، فإنَّ أبا ثابت هو: محمد بن عُبيد الله المَدِيني، وأبو صَخْر: حميد بن زياد، وأبو معاوية البجلي: عمارٌ الدُّهني، وكلُّهم متفقٌ عليهم (1)، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4298 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين، فإنَّ أبا ثابت هو: محمد بن عُبيد الله المَدِيني، وأبو صَخْر: حميد بن زياد، وأبو معاوية البجلي: عمارٌ الدُّهني، وكلُّهم متفقٌ عليهم (1)، ولم يخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4298 - على شرط البخاري ومسلم
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Ali bin Abi Talib (may Allah be pleased with him) that he said: "On the day of the Battle of Badr we had only two horses: one belonged to Sayyiduna al-Zubayr bin al-Awwam (may Allah be pleased with him) and one to Sayyiduna al-Miqdad bin al-Aswad (may Allah be pleased with him)."
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), because Abu Thabit is Muhammad bin Ubaydullah al-Madini, Abu Sakhr is Humayd bin Ziyad, and Abu Mu'awiyah al-Bajali is Ammar al-Duhni, and all of these narrators are agreed upon, but the two Shaykhs did not record it.
This hadith is sahih (authentic) on the condition of the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim), because Abu Thabit is Muhammad bin Ubaydullah al-Madini, Abu Sakhr is Humayd bin Ziyad, and Abu Mu'awiyah al-Bajali is Ammar al-Duhni, and all of these narrators are agreed upon, but the two Shaykhs did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) إسناده ضعيف لانقطاعه بين عمار الدهني وسعيد بن جُبير، فإنه لم يسمع منه شيئًا، وقد سلف بأطول ممّا هنا برقم (2538). وأصح من ذلك عن عليّ ما جاء في "مسند أحمد" 2/ (1023) من طريق أخرى عنه، أنه قال: ما كان فينا فارسٌ يوم بدر غير المقداد. وإسناده صحيح.
Grading: (1) This chain is da'if.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Because there is an "inqita'" (break) between 'Ammar al-Duhni and Sa'id bin Jubayr; he did not hear anything from Sa'id. This narration has already appeared in a longer form at no. (2538).
Important point / Preference: More authentic than this from 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) is what is narrated through another route in "Musnad Ahmad" (2/ 1023), that he said: "On the day of Badr there was no horseman among us except al-Miqdad." And its chain is sahih.
لكن يشهد لرواية ابن عبّاس عن عليّ: مرسل عبد الله البهي عند سعيد بن يحيى بن سعيد الأموي عن أبيه، كما في "البداية والنهاية" لابن كثير 5/ 66، والطبراني في "الكبير" (231)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 18/ 352 - 353 من طريق جامع أبي سلمة، كلاهما (يحيى بن سعيد الأموي وجامع) عن إسماعيل بن أبي خالد، عن البهي.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: However, the narration of Ibn 'Abbas from 'Ali has a shahid (supporting report) in the "mursal" narration of 'Abd Allah al-Bahi, which is found with Sa'id bin Yahya bin Sa'id al-Umawi from his father (see: al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah by Ibn Kathir 5/ 66), and in al-Tabarani's "al-Kabir" (231) and Ibn 'Asakir's "Tarikh Dimashq" (18/ 352-353) by way of Jami' Abu Salamah. Both of them (Yahya al-Umawi and Jami') narrate it from Isma'il bin Abi Khalid, from al-Bahi.
ومرسلُ يزيد بن رومان عند ابن سعد في "طبقاته الكبرى" 2/ 21. غير أنه زاد ذكر فرسًا ثالثًا لمرثد بن أبي مَرثد.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: And the "mursal" narration of Yazid bin Ruman is also a shahid, which is in Ibn Sa'd's "al-Tabaqat al-Kubra" (2/ 21).
Details of the narration: However, he added in it mention of a third horse, which belonged to "Marthad bin Abi Marthad".
وكذلك قال الواقدي في "مغازيه" 1/ 27 نقلًا عن شيوخه. وسيأتي عن الواقدي برقم (5048) تسمية فرس مرثد يوم بدر بالسَّبَل.
Reference / Source: Likewise al-Waqidi also said this in his "al-Maghazi" (1/ 27), relating it from his shaykhs. And it will come later (no. 5048) from al-Waqidi that the name of Marthad's horse on the day of Badr was "al-Sabal".
وسيأتي عن عروة بن الزبير عند المصنف برقم (5046) قوله: كان مع رسول الله ﷺ يوم بدرٍ فرسان، أحدهما لِمَرثدِ بن أبي مرثد، والآخرُ للزبير. فاقتصر على فرسي الزبير ومرثد، ولم يذكر فرس المقداد.
Details of the narration: And later (no. 5046) with the author (al-Hakim) will come the statement of 'Urwah bin al-Zubayr: "On the day of Badr there were two horses with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), one belonging to Marthad bin Abi Marthad and the other to al-Zubayr." He limited himself to the horses of al-Zubayr and Marthad and did not mention the horse of al-Miqdad.
وأما ابن إسحاق فذكر أنَّ مرثد بن أبي مرثد كان يعتِقب هو وعليٌّ ورسول الله ﷺ على بعيرٍ، كذا قال كما في "سيرة ابن هشام" 1/ 612.
Details of the narration: Whereas Ibn Ishaq mentioned that Marthad bin Abi Marthad, 'Ali and the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) used to ride one camel in turns (i.e. he had no horse). That is what he said, as found in "Sirat Ibn Hisham" (1/ 612).
وهو قول الزُّهْري وموسى بن عقبة كما في "دلائل النبوة" للبيهقي 3/ 101 - 106، فالله تعالى أعلم.
Note / Clarification: This is also the view of al-Zuhri and Musa bin 'Uqbah, as found in al-Bayhaqi's "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" (3/ 101-106). And Allah the Exalted knows best.
(1) بل لم يخرج البخاري لعمار الدُّهني ولا لأبي صخر المدني في "الصحيح" شيئًا، وإنما أخرج لأبي صخر وحده في "الأدب المفرد"، على أنَّ ثابتًا المدني من رجال البخاري دون مسلم، فمن أين اتُّفق عليهم!
Note / Criticism: (1) (Al-Hakim's statement that al-Bukhari and Muslim agree on them is not correct.) Rather, al-Bukhari did not narrate anything from 'Ammar al-Duhni or Abu Sakhr al-Madani in "al-Sahih"; he narrated only from Abu Sakhr alone in "al-Adab al-Mufrad". Moreover, Thabit al-Madani is among the narrators of al-Bukhari only, not of Muslim; so where did "agreement" upon them come from?!
Grading: (1) This chain is da'if.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Because there is an "inqita'" (break) between 'Ammar al-Duhni and Sa'id bin Jubayr; he did not hear anything from Sa'id. This narration has already appeared in a longer form at no. (2538).
Important point / Preference: More authentic than this from 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) is what is narrated through another route in "Musnad Ahmad" (2/ 1023), that he said: "On the day of Badr there was no horseman among us except al-Miqdad." And its chain is sahih.
لكن يشهد لرواية ابن عبّاس عن عليّ: مرسل عبد الله البهي عند سعيد بن يحيى بن سعيد الأموي عن أبيه، كما في "البداية والنهاية" لابن كثير 5/ 66، والطبراني في "الكبير" (231)، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 18/ 352 - 353 من طريق جامع أبي سلمة، كلاهما (يحيى بن سعيد الأموي وجامع) عن إسماعيل بن أبي خالد، عن البهي.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: However, the narration of Ibn 'Abbas from 'Ali has a shahid (supporting report) in the "mursal" narration of 'Abd Allah al-Bahi, which is found with Sa'id bin Yahya bin Sa'id al-Umawi from his father (see: al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah by Ibn Kathir 5/ 66), and in al-Tabarani's "al-Kabir" (231) and Ibn 'Asakir's "Tarikh Dimashq" (18/ 352-353) by way of Jami' Abu Salamah. Both of them (Yahya al-Umawi and Jami') narrate it from Isma'il bin Abi Khalid, from al-Bahi.
ومرسلُ يزيد بن رومان عند ابن سعد في "طبقاته الكبرى" 2/ 21. غير أنه زاد ذكر فرسًا ثالثًا لمرثد بن أبي مَرثد.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: And the "mursal" narration of Yazid bin Ruman is also a shahid, which is in Ibn Sa'd's "al-Tabaqat al-Kubra" (2/ 21).
Details of the narration: However, he added in it mention of a third horse, which belonged to "Marthad bin Abi Marthad".
وكذلك قال الواقدي في "مغازيه" 1/ 27 نقلًا عن شيوخه. وسيأتي عن الواقدي برقم (5048) تسمية فرس مرثد يوم بدر بالسَّبَل.
Reference / Source: Likewise al-Waqidi also said this in his "al-Maghazi" (1/ 27), relating it from his shaykhs. And it will come later (no. 5048) from al-Waqidi that the name of Marthad's horse on the day of Badr was "al-Sabal".
وسيأتي عن عروة بن الزبير عند المصنف برقم (5046) قوله: كان مع رسول الله ﷺ يوم بدرٍ فرسان، أحدهما لِمَرثدِ بن أبي مرثد، والآخرُ للزبير. فاقتصر على فرسي الزبير ومرثد، ولم يذكر فرس المقداد.
Details of the narration: And later (no. 5046) with the author (al-Hakim) will come the statement of 'Urwah bin al-Zubayr: "On the day of Badr there were two horses with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), one belonging to Marthad bin Abi Marthad and the other to al-Zubayr." He limited himself to the horses of al-Zubayr and Marthad and did not mention the horse of al-Miqdad.
وأما ابن إسحاق فذكر أنَّ مرثد بن أبي مرثد كان يعتِقب هو وعليٌّ ورسول الله ﷺ على بعيرٍ، كذا قال كما في "سيرة ابن هشام" 1/ 612.
Details of the narration: Whereas Ibn Ishaq mentioned that Marthad bin Abi Marthad, 'Ali and the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) used to ride one camel in turns (i.e. he had no horse). That is what he said, as found in "Sirat Ibn Hisham" (1/ 612).
وهو قول الزُّهْري وموسى بن عقبة كما في "دلائل النبوة" للبيهقي 3/ 101 - 106، فالله تعالى أعلم.
Note / Clarification: This is also the view of al-Zuhri and Musa bin 'Uqbah, as found in al-Bayhaqi's "Dala'il al-Nubuwwah" (3/ 101-106). And Allah the Exalted knows best.
(1) بل لم يخرج البخاري لعمار الدُّهني ولا لأبي صخر المدني في "الصحيح" شيئًا، وإنما أخرج لأبي صخر وحده في "الأدب المفرد"، على أنَّ ثابتًا المدني من رجال البخاري دون مسلم، فمن أين اتُّفق عليهم!
Note / Criticism: (1) (Al-Hakim's statement that al-Bukhari and Muslim agree on them is not correct.) Rather, al-Bukhari did not narrate anything from 'Ammar al-Duhni or Abu Sakhr al-Madani in "al-Sahih"; he narrated only from Abu Sakhr alone in "al-Adab al-Mufrad". Moreover, Thabit al-Madani is among the narrators of al-Bukhari only, not of Muslim; so where did "agreement" upon them come from?!
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4344
