Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب : آيات رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم التي في دلائل النبوة
Book of the Signs of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) among the Proofs of Prophethood
كَانَ أَجْوَدَ النَّاسِ بِالْخَيْرِ مِنَ الرِّيحِ الْمُرْسَلَةِ
He was more generous in good than the free-blowing wind
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4273
اُردوEn
حدثنا عَلي بن حَمْشَاذَ العَدْل إملاءً، حدثنا هارون بن العباس الهاشمي، حدثنا جَنْدَلُ بن والقٍ، حدثنا عمرو بن أوس الأنصاري، حدثنا سعيد بن أبي عَروبة، عن قَتَادة، عن سعيد بن المسيّب، عن ابن عبّاس، قال: أوحَى اللهُ إلى عيسى ﵇: يا عيسى، آمن بمحمدٍ، وأُمُر من أدركَه من أمتك أن يُؤمنوا به، فلولا محمدٌ ما خلقتُ آدمَ، ولولا محمدٌ ما خلقتُ الجنةَ والنارَ، ولقد خلقتُ العرشَ على الماء، فاضطربَ فكتبتُ عليه: لا إله إلّا الله [محمد رسول الله] (2) فسَكَنَ (3).
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4227 - أظنه موضوعا على سعيد
هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد، ولم يُخرجاه.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4227 - أظنه موضوعا على سعيد
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) that Allah Almighty revealed to Isa (peace be upon him): O Isa, believe in Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), and command those of your nation who reach his time to believe in him. Had it not been for Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), I would not have created Adam; and had it not been for Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), I would not have created Paradise and Hell. When I created the Throne upon the water, it began to tremble; then I wrote upon it 'La ilaha illallah Muhammadur Rasulullah' (There is no god but Allah; Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah), and it became still.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
This hadith has a sahih (authentic) chain, but the two Shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim) did not record it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) ما بين المعقوفين سقط من النسخ الخطية، وهو ثابت لجميع من خرَّجه، وهو مرادٌ هنا بلا شك.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The text between the brackets (ma'qufayn) had dropped out of the manuscripts, but it is present (established) with all the hadith scholars who recorded it, and it is undoubtedly what is intended here.
(3) ضعيف منكر، عمرو بن أوس الأنصاري مجهول لا يُعرَف، ولم يَرِد ذكره إلّا في هذا الخبر، وقد انفرد به بهذا الإسناد، فقال الذهبي في "تلخيصه": أظنه موضوعًا على سعيد. قلنا: يعني سعيد بن أبي عَروبة. وقال في "الميزان" في ترجمة عمرو بن أوس هذا يُجهَلُ حاله، وأتى بخبر منكر.
Grading: This hadith is weak and munkar (denounced).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): 'Amr bin Aws al-Ansari is an unknown (majhul) narrator; nothing is known of him and he is not mentioned anywhere except in this report, and he is alone in narrating it with this chain. Al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis": "I think it has been fabricated (mawdu') upon Sa'id." We say: he means Sa'id bin Abi 'Arubah. Al-Dhahabi also wrote in "al-Mizan", in the biography of 'Amr bin Aws, that his condition is unknown and that he brought a munkar report.
وقد روى هذا الخبر محمد بن حمدون بن خالد الحافظ عند الثعلبي في "تفسيره" 7/ 61 عن هارون بن العباس الهاشمي، قال: حدثنا محمد بن بشر بن شريك، قال: حدثنا جندل، وكذلك رواه أبو بكر الخلال في "السنة" (316) عن محمد بن بشر بن شريك، عن جندل، فإن كان الصحيح ذكر محمد بن بشر بن شريك في هذا الإسناد فهذه علة أخرى في الخبر، وهي ضعف محمد بن بشر هذا، فقد قال عنه الذهبي في "الميزان": ما هو بعُمدة. قلنا: لكن تابعه محمد بن عصمة الخراساني عند الخلال (316) إلّا أنَّ الراوي عنه مجهول لا يُعرف.
Details of the narration: This report was narrated by Muhammad bin Hamdun bin Khalid al-Hafiz in al-Tha'labi's "Tafsir" 7/ 61 from Harun bin al-'Abbas al-Hashimi, from Muhammad bin Bishr bin Sharik, from Jandal. Likewise Abu Bakr al-Khallal narrated it in "al-Sunnah" (316) from Muhammad bin Bishr bin Sharik, from Jandal.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): If mentioning Muhammad bin Bishr bin Sharik in this chain is in fact correct, then this is another "defect" ('illah) in this report, namely the weakness of this Muhammad bin Bishr. Al-Dhahabi said about him in "al-Mizan": "He is not reliable ('umdah)." We say: although Muhammad bin 'Ismah al-Khurasani corroborated him in al-Khallal (316), the narrator who narrates from him is unknown and not recognised.
وقد روي نحو هذا الخبر عن ابن عبّاس من وجه آخر لا يُفرح به، فقد أخرجه ابن الديلمي في "مسند الفردوس" كما في "الغرائب الملتقطة" منه للحافظ ابن حجر (253)، وابن الفاخر في "موجبات الجنة" (423) من طريق الفضل بن جعفر بن سليمان بن علي بن عبد الله بن عبّاس، عن عبد الصمد بن علي بن عبد الله بن عبّاس، عن أبيه، عن جده، قال الذهبي في "الميزان": ما عبد الصمد بحجة. قلنا: والفضل بن جعفر الراوي عنه مجهول لا يُدرَى حالُه.
Details of the narration: A report similar to this is narrated from Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them) via another chain which is not reliable at all (la yufrahu bihi).
Reference / Source: Ibn al-Daylami recorded it in "Musnad al-Firdaws" (as in al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar's "al-Ghara'ib al-Multaqatah" 253) and Ibn al-Fakhir in "Mujibat al-Jannah" (423), via al-Fadl bin Ja'far bin Sulayman bin 'Ali bin 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas, from 'Abd al-Samad bin 'Ali bin 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas, from his father, from his grandfather.
Grading: Al-Dhahabi said in "al-Mizan": "'Abd al-Samad (the narrator in this chain) is not a proof (hujjah)."
Technical note / Defect ('illah): We say: and al-Fadl bin Ja'far, who narrates from him, is also unknown (majhul); his condition is not known.
وفي الباب عن عمر بن الخطاب بعده، لكنه لا يُعتدُّ به كذلك لما سيأتي بيانه.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: On this topic there is also a narration from 'Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), which will come next, but it too is not reliable, as will be explained.
وفي الكتابة على العرش: لا إله إلّا الله محمد رسول الله، أخبار ذكرها ابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" (609) و (630)، واستوفاها السيوطي في "اللآلئ المصنوعة" 1/ 274 و 282 و 292، وابن عراق في "تنزيه الشريعة" 1/ 350 - 351 و 401 - 402 و 405، وكلها لا تقوم بها الحجة، وغالبها يشتمل على وضّاعين.
General principle: Regarding "La ilaha illa Allah, Muhammad Rasul Allah" being written on the Throne there are several narrations, which Ibn al-Jawzi mentioned in "al-Mawdu'at" (609, 630), and which al-Suyuti covered in "al-La'ali' al-Masnu'ah" (at various pages) and Ibn 'Arraq in "Tanzih al-Shari'ah".
Grading: All these narrations are such that no proof can be established by them, and most of their chains include "fabricators" (wadda'in).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The text between the brackets (ma'qufayn) had dropped out of the manuscripts, but it is present (established) with all the hadith scholars who recorded it, and it is undoubtedly what is intended here.
(3) ضعيف منكر، عمرو بن أوس الأنصاري مجهول لا يُعرَف، ولم يَرِد ذكره إلّا في هذا الخبر، وقد انفرد به بهذا الإسناد، فقال الذهبي في "تلخيصه": أظنه موضوعًا على سعيد. قلنا: يعني سعيد بن أبي عَروبة. وقال في "الميزان" في ترجمة عمرو بن أوس هذا يُجهَلُ حاله، وأتى بخبر منكر.
Grading: This hadith is weak and munkar (denounced).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): 'Amr bin Aws al-Ansari is an unknown (majhul) narrator; nothing is known of him and he is not mentioned anywhere except in this report, and he is alone in narrating it with this chain. Al-Dhahabi said in "al-Talkhis": "I think it has been fabricated (mawdu') upon Sa'id." We say: he means Sa'id bin Abi 'Arubah. Al-Dhahabi also wrote in "al-Mizan", in the biography of 'Amr bin Aws, that his condition is unknown and that he brought a munkar report.
وقد روى هذا الخبر محمد بن حمدون بن خالد الحافظ عند الثعلبي في "تفسيره" 7/ 61 عن هارون بن العباس الهاشمي، قال: حدثنا محمد بن بشر بن شريك، قال: حدثنا جندل، وكذلك رواه أبو بكر الخلال في "السنة" (316) عن محمد بن بشر بن شريك، عن جندل، فإن كان الصحيح ذكر محمد بن بشر بن شريك في هذا الإسناد فهذه علة أخرى في الخبر، وهي ضعف محمد بن بشر هذا، فقد قال عنه الذهبي في "الميزان": ما هو بعُمدة. قلنا: لكن تابعه محمد بن عصمة الخراساني عند الخلال (316) إلّا أنَّ الراوي عنه مجهول لا يُعرف.
Details of the narration: This report was narrated by Muhammad bin Hamdun bin Khalid al-Hafiz in al-Tha'labi's "Tafsir" 7/ 61 from Harun bin al-'Abbas al-Hashimi, from Muhammad bin Bishr bin Sharik, from Jandal. Likewise Abu Bakr al-Khallal narrated it in "al-Sunnah" (316) from Muhammad bin Bishr bin Sharik, from Jandal.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): If mentioning Muhammad bin Bishr bin Sharik in this chain is in fact correct, then this is another "defect" ('illah) in this report, namely the weakness of this Muhammad bin Bishr. Al-Dhahabi said about him in "al-Mizan": "He is not reliable ('umdah)." We say: although Muhammad bin 'Ismah al-Khurasani corroborated him in al-Khallal (316), the narrator who narrates from him is unknown and not recognised.
وقد روي نحو هذا الخبر عن ابن عبّاس من وجه آخر لا يُفرح به، فقد أخرجه ابن الديلمي في "مسند الفردوس" كما في "الغرائب الملتقطة" منه للحافظ ابن حجر (253)، وابن الفاخر في "موجبات الجنة" (423) من طريق الفضل بن جعفر بن سليمان بن علي بن عبد الله بن عبّاس، عن عبد الصمد بن علي بن عبد الله بن عبّاس، عن أبيه، عن جده، قال الذهبي في "الميزان": ما عبد الصمد بحجة. قلنا: والفضل بن جعفر الراوي عنه مجهول لا يُدرَى حالُه.
Details of the narration: A report similar to this is narrated from Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them) via another chain which is not reliable at all (la yufrahu bihi).
Reference / Source: Ibn al-Daylami recorded it in "Musnad al-Firdaws" (as in al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar's "al-Ghara'ib al-Multaqatah" 253) and Ibn al-Fakhir in "Mujibat al-Jannah" (423), via al-Fadl bin Ja'far bin Sulayman bin 'Ali bin 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas, from 'Abd al-Samad bin 'Ali bin 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas, from his father, from his grandfather.
Grading: Al-Dhahabi said in "al-Mizan": "'Abd al-Samad (the narrator in this chain) is not a proof (hujjah)."
Technical note / Defect ('illah): We say: and al-Fadl bin Ja'far, who narrates from him, is also unknown (majhul); his condition is not known.
وفي الباب عن عمر بن الخطاب بعده، لكنه لا يُعتدُّ به كذلك لما سيأتي بيانه.
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: On this topic there is also a narration from 'Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), which will come next, but it too is not reliable, as will be explained.
وفي الكتابة على العرش: لا إله إلّا الله محمد رسول الله، أخبار ذكرها ابن الجوزي في "الموضوعات" (609) و (630)، واستوفاها السيوطي في "اللآلئ المصنوعة" 1/ 274 و 282 و 292، وابن عراق في "تنزيه الشريعة" 1/ 350 - 351 و 401 - 402 و 405، وكلها لا تقوم بها الحجة، وغالبها يشتمل على وضّاعين.
General principle: Regarding "La ilaha illa Allah, Muhammad Rasul Allah" being written on the Throne there are several narrations, which Ibn al-Jawzi mentioned in "al-Mawdu'at" (609, 630), and which al-Suyuti covered in "al-La'ali' al-Masnu'ah" (at various pages) and Ibn 'Arraq in "Tanzih al-Shari'ah".
Grading: All these narrations are such that no proof can be established by them, and most of their chains include "fabricators" (wadda'in).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4273
