◈ Liberalism: Human Freedom or Barbaric Autonomy? ◈
❀ The Philosophical Foundation of Liberalism, Socialism, and Nationalism ❀
Like socialism and nationalism, liberalism is rooted in the concept of human autonomy and self-deification, where the prevailing idea is:
“Lā ilāha illā al-insān” — There is no god but man.
According to this worldview, any individual who does not accept this human-centered ideology is denied even the status of a human being.
❀ Genocide of Native Americans and Justification by Liberal Thought ❀
During the colonization of the American continent, nearly 80 million Native Americans were exterminated.
This was justified by John Locke, who argued that since Native Americans did not participate in the capital-generating process and were “devoid of human consciousness,” it was necessary to eliminate them.
Similarly, John Rawls, a renowned 20th-century thinker, affirmed this ideology. In his book Political Liberalism, he stated:
Those who do not accept “freedom” as an absolute value should be eliminated just like a dangerous epidemic.
❀ Liberalism, Guantanamo, and the Mujahideen of Islam ❀
The torture chambers of Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib were legitimized under liberal principles by presidents Bush and Obama.
To Obama, the Mujahideen of Islam, who believe in servitude to Allah rather than human freedom, are not to be considered human, and thus subject to any form of oppression.
❀ Immanuel Kant’s Thought: Human Autonomy and Freedom ❀
According to Immanuel Kant:
① Man is omnipotent, and his reason empowers him to dominate the world.
② All moral values revolve around the principle of human freedom and capital expansion.
③ Any action that hinders the growth of freedom must be abolished.
④ In Kant’s philosophy, reason serves both as a slave to human desires and as their guide.
For example, if Obama wishes to commit adultery, his reason will guide him on how to do so without infringing upon the freedom of the other person.
❀ Human Rights and the Liberal Sphere ❀
According to Michel Foucault, the concept of the “human being” did not exist before the 17th century.
John Locke posited that only those individuals who believe in “human divinity” qualify as human beings.
As a result, the Mujahideen of Islam and Native Americans were excluded from this definition, and their human rights were denied.
❀ Liberal Human Rights in the United Nations Charter ❀
✔ Right to Life:
Life is protected only if it contributes to capital generation.
If an individual becomes an obstacle to this, their elimination becomes necessary, as practiced by Obama against Native Americans and Islamic fighters.
✔ Right to Property:
Every individual has the right to use their property for increasing capital.
If someone uses their property to obstruct this process, it will be confiscated—as was done in Afghanistan.
✔ Right to Freedom of Expression:
One has the right to express opinions only if they serve capital growth, such as publishing obscene images or insulting prophets.
In liberal societies, opinions opposing “freedom” or liberal values are either restricted or entirely silenced.
❀ Liberalism and Satanic Individualism ❀
The individualism promoted by liberalism is driven by lust and rage. According to St. Iglesias, the concept of the “human being” does not represent humanity, but rather satanism, and Obama is its living embodiment.
✔ Conclusion: Freedom in Liberalism—A Mask for Oppression
Liberalism, under the guise of freedom and human rights, is in reality a ruthless ideology that permits the elimination of dissenters and religious individuals. Its deification of man has produced a system where only capital, autonomy, and secularism matter, and those who reject these ideals are deemed unworthy of life, rights, or humanity.
