السنن الكبرى للبيهقي
Sunan al-Kubra al-Bayhaqi
كتاب الخلع والطلاق
Book of Khul and Divorce
باب: الخلع هل هو فسخ أو طلاق
Is khul' an annulment or a divorce
Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو الْحُسَيْنِ عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ بِشْرَانَ بِبَغْدَادَ أنا إِسْمَاعِيلُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الصَّفَّارُ، نا سَعْدَانُ بْنُ نَصْرٍ، نا سُفْيَانُ، عَنْ عَمْرٍو، عَنْ طَاوُسٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُمَا قَالَ: سَأَلَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ ابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ عَنِ امْرَأَةٍ طَلَّقَهَا زَوْجُهَا تَطْلِيقَتَيْنِ ثُمَّ اخْتَلَعَتْ مِنْهُ أَيَتَزَوَّجُهَا؟ قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: " ذَكَرَ اللهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ الطَّلَاقَ فِي أَوَّلِ الْآيَةِ وَآخِرِهَا وَالْخُلْعَ بَيْنَ ذَلِكَ فَلَيْسَ الْخُلْعُ بِطَلَاقٍ، يَنْكِحُهَا " وَرَوَاهُ أَيْضًا حَبِيبُ بْنُ أَبِي ثَابِتٍ، وَلَيْثُ بْنُ أَبِي سُلَيْمٍ عَنْ طَاوُسٍ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ بِمَعْنَاهُ مُخْتَصَرًا، وَرَوَى الشَّافِعِيُّ عَنْ سُفْيَانَ عَنْ عَمْرٍو عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ قَالَ: كُلُّ شَيْءٍ أَجَازَهُ الْمَالُ فَلَيْسَ بِطَلَاقٍ.
Ibrahim bin Sa'd (may Allah have mercy on him) asked Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) about a woman whose husband divorced her twice and who then took khul' from her husband: may the husband marry her? Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) said: Allah mentioned divorce at the beginning of the verse and at its end, and khul' is mentioned in between; so khul' is not divorce, and he may marry her.
(b) Amr (may Allah have mercy on him) narrates from Ikrimah (may Allah have mercy on him): Everything that is made permissible through wealth is not divorce.
(b) Amr (may Allah have mercy on him) narrates from Ikrimah (may Allah have mercy on him): Everything that is made permissible through wealth is not divorce.
وَأَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو زَكَرِيَّا بْنُ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ، وَأَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ قَالَا: نا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ هُوَ الْأَصَمُّ أنا الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ، أنا الشَّافِعِيُّ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ أنا مَالِكٌ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جُمْهَانَ، مَوْلَى الْأَسْلَمِيِّينَ عَنْ أُمِّ بَكْرَةَ الْأَسْلَمِيَّةِ، أَنَّهَا اخْتَلَعَتْ مِنْ زَوْجِهَا عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ أُسَيْدٍ ثُمَّ أَتَيَا عُثْمَانَ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ فِي ذَلِكَ فَقَالَ: " هِيَ تَطْلِيقَةٌ إِلَّا أَنْ تَكُونَ سَمَّيْتَ شَيْئًا فَهُوَ مَا سَمَّيْتَ " وَقَدْ رُوِيَ فِيهِ حَدِيثٌ مُسْنَدٌ لَمْ يَثْبُتْ إِسْنَادُهُ، وَرُوِيَ فِيهِ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ وَابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُمَا قَالَ ابْنُ الْمُنْذِرِ: وَضَعَّفَ أَحْمَدُ يَعْنِي ابْنَ حَنْبَلٍ حَدِيثَ عُثْمَانَ، وَحَدِيثُ عَلِيٍّ وَابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُمَا فِي إِسْنَادِهِمَا مَقَالٌ، وَلَيْسَ فِي الْبَابِ أَصَحُّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ يُرِيدُ حَدِيثَ طَاوُسٍ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُمَا.
Umm Bakrah al-Aslamiyyah (may Allah be pleased with her) took khul' from her husband Abdullah bin Usayd (may Allah be pleased with him). Then they came to Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him), and he said: "It is one divorce, unless you named something, in which case it is what you named."
A musnad (connected) hadith has been narrated on this, but its chain is not established. It has also been narrated from Ali and Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with them both). Ibn al-Mundhir said: Ahmad bin Hanbal declared the report of Uthman weak, and the chains of the reports of Ali and Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with them both) have been criticised; there is nothing in this chapter more sound than the report of Ibn Abbas, meaning the report of Tawus from Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both).
A musnad (connected) hadith has been narrated on this, but its chain is not established. It has also been narrated from Ali and Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with them both). Ibn al-Mundhir said: Ahmad bin Hanbal declared the report of Uthman weak, and the chains of the reports of Ali and Ibn Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with them both) have been criticised; there is nothing in this chapter more sound than the report of Ibn Abbas, meaning the report of Tawus from Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both).
أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو الْفَضْلِ عُمَرُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ إِسْمَاعِيلَ الْهَرَوِيُّ قَدِمَ عَلَيْنَا حَاجًّا نا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ الْإِسْمَاعِيلِيُّ، أَخْبَرَنِي أَبُو يَعْلَى أَحْمَدُ بْنُ عَلِيِّ بْنِ الْمُثَنَّى نا عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبْدِ الصَّمَدِ بْنِ أَبِي خِدَاشٍ، نا أَبُو عِصَامٍ رَوَّادُ بْنُ الْجَرَّاحِ عَنْ عَبَّادِ بْنِ كَثِيرٍ، عَنْ أَيُّوبَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُمَا أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ " جَعَلَ الْخُلْعَ تَطْلِيقَةً بَائِنَةً " تَفَرَّدَ بِهِ عَبَّادُ بْنُ كَثِيرٍ الْبَصْرِيُّ وَقَدْ ضَعَّفَهُ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ حَنْبَلٍ وَيَحْيَى بْنُ مَعِينٍ وَالْبُخَارِيُّ وَتَكَلَّمَ فِيهِ شُعْبَةُ بْنُ الْحَجَّاجِ وَكَيْفَ يَصِحُّ ذَلِكَ وَمَذْهَبُ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ وَعِكْرِمَةَ بِخِلَافِهِ عَلَى أَنَّهُ يَحْتَمِلُ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْمُرَادُ بِهِ إِذَا نَوَى بِهِ طَلَاقًا أَوْ ذَكَرَهُ وَالْمَقْصُودُ مِنْهُ قَطْعُ الرَّجْعَةِ، وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ.
Ikrimah (may Allah have mercy on him) narrates from Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) "counted khul' as an irrevocable divorce (talaq ba'in)".
Abbad bin Kathir al-Basri alone narrated it; Ahmad bin Hanbal, Yahya bin Ma'in and al-Bukhari declared him da'if (weak), and Shu'bah bin al-Hajjaj criticised him. How can it be sound when the view of Ibn Abbas and Ikrimah is contrary to it? Moreover, it may be meant for when he intends divorce by it or mentions it, the purpose being to cut off the right to take her back; and Allah knows best.
Abbad bin Kathir al-Basri alone narrated it; Ahmad bin Hanbal, Yahya bin Ma'in and al-Bukhari declared him da'if (weak), and Shu'bah bin al-Hajjaj criticised him. How can it be sound when the view of Ibn Abbas and Ikrimah is contrary to it? Moreover, it may be meant for when he intends divorce by it or mentions it, the purpose being to cut off the right to take her back; and Allah knows best.
