Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
السنن الكبرى للبيهقي
Sunan al-Kubra al-Bayhaqi
كتاب الصيام
Book of Fasting
باب: قضاء شهر رمضان إن شاء متفرقا، وإن شاء متتابعا
Chapter: Making up Ramadan separately or consecutively as one wishes
Bayhaqi 8243 — Making up Ramadan separately or consecutively as one
اُردوEn
أَخْبَرَنَاهُ أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ الْفَقِيهُ، أنبأ عَلِيُّ بْنُ عُمَرَ الْحَافِظُ، ثنا ابْنُ مَنِيعٍ، ثنا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، ثنا يَحْيَى بْنُ سُلَيْمٍ الطَّائِفِيُّ، عَنْ مُوسَى بْنِ عُقْبَةَ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الْمُنْكَدِرِ، قَالَ: بَلَغَنِي أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ سُئِلَ عَنْ تَقْطِيعِ قَضَاءِ صِيَامِ شَهْرِ رَمَضَانَ، فَقَالَ: " ذَلِكَ إِلَيْكَ، أَرَأَيْتَ لَوْ كَانَ عَلَى أَحَدِكُمْ دَيْنٌ فَقَضَى الدِّرْهَمَ وَالدِّرْهَمَيْنِ، أَلَمْ يَكُنْ قَضَاءً؟ فَاللهُ أَحَقُّ أَنْ يَعْفُوَ أَوْ يَغْفِرَ " قَالَ عَلِيٌّ: إِسْنَادُهُ حَسَنٌ إِلَّا أَنَّهُ مُرْسَلٌ، وَقَدْ وَصَلَهُ غَيْرُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سُلَيْمٍ وَلَا يَثْبُتُ مُتَّصِلًا. ⦗٤٣٣⦘ قَالَ الشَّيْخُ: وَقَدْ رُوِيَ مِنْ وَجْهٍ آخَرَ ضَعِيفٍ عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ مَرْفُوعًا، وَقَدْ رُوِيَ فِي مُقَابَلَتِهِ عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ فِي النَّهْيِ عَنِ الْقَطْعِ مَرْفُوعًا وَكَيْفَ يَكُونُ ذَلِكَ صَحِيحًا وَمَذْهَبُ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ جَوَازُ التَّفْرِيقِ وَمَذْهَبُ ابْنِ عُمَرَ الْمُتَابَعَةُ، وَقَدْ رُوِيَ مِنْ وَجْهٍ آخَرَ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ مَرْفُوعًا فِي جَوَازِ التَّفْرِيقِ وَلَا يَصِحُّ شَيْءٌ مِنْ ذَلِكَ.
Muhammad bin al-Munkadir (may Allah have mercy on him) said: It reached me that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about making up the fasts of Ramadan separately, and he (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "That is up to you. Tell me, if someone owes a debt and he pays one or two dirhams of it, would that not be payment? So Allah has a greater right to overlook and forgive."
Ali (al-Daraqutni) said: Its chain is hasan (good) except that it is mursal; others besides Abu Bakr narrated it from Yahya bin Sulaym as connected, but it is not established as connected. It has also been narrated marfu' from Ibn Umar through another, weak, route; and in contrast to it, a marfu' report from Abu Hurayrah forbidding splitting has been narrated, but how could that be authentic when the view of Abu Hurayrah was that splitting is permissible and the view of Ibn Umar was to fast consecutively? It has also been narrated marfu' from Abdullah bin Amr bin al-As through another route on the permissibility of splitting, and none of that is authentic.
Ali (al-Daraqutni) said: Its chain is hasan (good) except that it is mursal; others besides Abu Bakr narrated it from Yahya bin Sulaym as connected, but it is not established as connected. It has also been narrated marfu' from Ibn Umar through another, weak, route; and in contrast to it, a marfu' report from Abu Hurayrah forbidding splitting has been narrated, but how could that be authentic when the view of Abu Hurayrah was that splitting is permissible and the view of Ibn Umar was to fast consecutively? It has also been narrated marfu' from Abdullah bin Amr bin al-As through another route on the permissibility of splitting, and none of that is authentic.
