Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Bayhaqi 7595 — What is taken from the sea, such as ambergris

وَأَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ، ثنا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ، ثنا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ شَيْبَانَ، ثنا سُفْيَانُ، ح وَأَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو زَكَرِيَّا، ثنا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ، أنبأ الرَّبِيعُ، أنبأ الشَّافِعِيُّ، أنبأ سُفْيَانُ، عَنِ ابْنِ طَاوُسٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ أَنَّهُ سُئِلَ عَنِ الْعَنْبَرِ أَفِيهِ زَكَاةٌ؟ فَقَالَ: " إِنْ كَانَ فِيهِ شَيْءٌ فَفِيهِ الْخُمُسُ ". لَفْظُ حَدِيثِ الشَّافِعِيِّ وَفِي رِوَايَةِ ابْنِ شَيْبَانَ قَالَ: سُئِلَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ عَنِ الْعَنْبَرِ أَفِيهِ ⦗٢٤٧⦘ زَكَاةٌ؟ ثُمَّ ذَكَرَ الْبَاقِيَ فَابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ عَلَّقَ الْقَوْلَ فِيهِ فِي هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَةِ وَقَطَعَ بِأَنْ لَا زَكَاةَ فِيهِ فِي الرِّوَايَةِ الْأُولَى فَالْقَطْعُ أَوْلَى وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ.
Ibn Tawus narrates from his father that Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) was asked about ambergris: is there zakah on it? He said: If anything is due on it, then the fifth (khumus) is due on it.
These are the words of the narration of Imam al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him). In the narration of Ibn Shayban: Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) was asked about ambergris: is there zakah on it? Then he mentioned the rest. So in this narration Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) made his statement conditional, while in the first narration he stated decisively that there is no zakah on it; and the decisive statement takes precedence.
Hadith Reference السنن الكبرى للبيهقي / كتاب الزكاة / 7595
Hadith Grading محدثین: صحيح
Hadith Takhrij «صحيح۔ أخرجه ابن ابي شيبه»