Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Bayhaqi 15255 — The one pronouncing zihar upon whom the expiation

وَأَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو سَعِيدِ بْنُ أَبِي عَمْرٍو، نا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ أنا الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ، أنا الشَّافِعِيُّ قَالَ: الَّذِي حَفِظْتُ مِمَّا سَمِعْتُ فِي {يَعُودُونَ لِمَا قَالُوا} [المجادلة: ٣] أَنَّ " الْمُظَاهِرَ حَرَّمَ امْرَأَتَهُ بِالظِّهَارِ فَإِذَا أَتَتْ عَلَيْهِ مُدَّةٌ بَعْدَ الْقَوْلِ بِالظِّهَارِ لَمْ يُحَرِّمْهَا بِالطَّلَاقِ الَّذِي تُحَرَّمُ بِهِ وَلَا بِشَيْءٍ يَكُونُ لَهُ مَخْرَجٌ مِنْ أَنْ تُحَرَّمَ بِهِ فَقَدْ وَجَبَتْ عَلَيْهِ كَفَّارَةُ الظِّهَارِ، كَأَنَّهُمْ يَذْهَبُونَ إِلَى أَنَّهُ إِذَا أَمْسَكَ مَا حَرَّمَ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ أَنَّهُ حَلَالٌ فَقَدْ عَادَ لِمَا قَالَ مُخَالَفَةٌ، فَأَحَلَّ مَا حَرَّمَ " قَالَ: وَلَا أَعْلَمُ لَهُ مَعْنًى أَوْلَى بِهِ مِنْ هَذَا قَالَ الشَّافِعِيُّ رَحِمَهُ اللهُ: لَا أَعْلَمُ مُخَالِفًا فِي أَنَّ عَلَيْهِ كَفَّارَةَ الظِّهَارِ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَعُدْ بِتَظَاهُرٍ آخَرَ فَلَمْ يَجُزْ أَنْ يُقَالَ مَا لَمْ أَعْلَمْ مُخَالِفًا فِي أَنَّهُ لَيْسَ بِمَعْنَى الْآيَةِ.
Imam al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him) said: What I have retained of what I heard concerning "then go back on what they said" [Surah al-Mujadilah: 3] is that the one who makes zihar has made his wife unlawful through zihar; so when a period of time passes after his pronouncement of zihar in which he has not made her unlawful through the divorce by which she becomes unlawful, nor through anything that would give him a way out of her being made unlawful by it, then the expiation of zihar has become obligatory upon him. It is as if they hold that when he retains what he had made unlawful upon himself, as being lawful, he has gone back on what he said, contradicting it, and has made lawful what he had made unlawful. He said: I do not know any meaning more fitting for it than this. Imam al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him) said: I know of no one who disagrees that the expiation of zihar is due from him even if he does not go back with another zihar; so it is not permissible to say something which, as far as I know, no one disagrees is not the meaning of the verse.
Hadith Reference السنن الكبرى للبيهقي / كتاب الظهار / 15255