Zayd bin Aslam (may Allah have mercy on him) said: I saw an elderly man in Alexandria who was called "Surraq". I said to him: What kind of name is this? He said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) gave me this name, and I will never abandon it. He said: I came to Madinah and told the people: My wealth is coming. So they traded with me, and I used up all of their wealth. They took me to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), and he said: "Anta Surraq" (You are a thief!). Then he (peace and blessings be upon him) sold me for four camels. My creditors asked the man who bought me: What will you do with him? He said: I will free him. They said: We are no less in need of reward than you. Then they freed me, and my name remained. There is another narration with the same meaning: Abd al-Rahman and Abdullah (may Allah have mercy on them both) narrate from their father Zayd bin Aslam (may Allah have mercy on him) in a fuller form than the above hadith; in it is that he bought a she-camel from a Bedouin and used up its price. Muslim bin Khalid al-Zanji also narrated it from Zayd bin Aslam, from Ibn al-Baylamani, from Surraq. Imam Ahmad (al-Bayhaqi) (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Our shaykh, Imam al-Hakim (may Allah have mercy on him), reported this narration in al-Mustadrak. In it, Abd al-Rahman bin al-Baylamani (may Allah have mercy on him) says: I saw an old man in Alexandria, and he related it in a fuller form than the hadith of Ibn Bashshar mentioned above. This hadith is weak, because most of the narrators in its chain are weak: the hadith of Surraq revolves around Abd al-Rahman bin Abdullah and the two sons of Zayd, none of whom is strong, and if it is from Zayd from Ibn al-Baylamani, then Ibn al-Baylamani is da'if (weak) in hadith. Moreover, the consensus of the scholars against it, when they do not agree on abandoning an established narration, is evidence of its weakness, or of its abrogation if it is established.
Hadith Referenceالسنن الكبرى للبيهقي / كتاب التفليس / 11275