Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
ذِكْرُ مَنَاقِبِ أَحَدِ الْفُقَهَاءِ السِّتَّةِ مِنَ الصَّحَابَةِ مُعَاذِ بْنِ جَبَلٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ
Virtues of Mu'adh bin Jabal (may Allah be pleased with him), one of the six jurists among the Companions
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 5249
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو العباس محمد بن يعقوب، حدثنا أحمد بن عبد الجبار، حدثنا يونس بن بُكَير، عن ابن إسحاق، في تَسمية من شهد العَقَبة: مُعاذ بن جَبَل بن عَمرو بن أَوس بن عائذ بن عَدي بن كعب بن غَنْم بن سعد بن عليّ بن أسَد بن سارِدةَ بن تَزِيد (2) بن جُشَم، وكان في بني سَلِمَة، شهدَ بدرًا مع رسول الله ﷺ والمَشاهِدَ كلَّها، ومات بعَمَوَاس عام الطاعُون بالشام في خِلافة عُمر بن الخطاب ﵁، وإنما ادَّعتُه بنو سَلِمة لأنه كان آخَى رجلًا منهم (3).
It is narrated from Ibn Ishaq, concerning those who took part in the Pledge of Aqabah, that among them was Mu'adh bin Jabal bin Amr bin Aws bin A'idh bin Adi bin Ka'b bin Ghanm bin Sa'd bin Ali bin Asad bin Saridah bin Tazid bin Jusham. He belonged to Banu Salimah. He took part in the Battle of Badr and in all the battles alongside the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him). He passed away in the plague of Amwas in Syria during the caliphate of Sayyiduna Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him). Banu Salimah attributed him to themselves because he had established brotherhood with one of their men.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) بالتاء المثناة، كما ضبطه الدارقطني في "المؤتلف والمختلف" 1/ 180 وغيره.
Note / Clarification: (2) This name is with the (two-dotted) letter ta', as Imam al-Daraqutni recorded its vocalisation in "al-Mu'talif wa al-Mukhtalif" (1/180), and others likewise.
(3) وهو في "السيرة النبوية" لابن هشام 1/ 463 - 464 غير أنه قال: ادَّعته بنو سلمة لأنه كان أخا سهل بن محمد بن الجد بن قيس بن صخرة لأمِّه. وكذلك جاء في سائر الروايات عن محمد بن إسحاق، وكذلك جاء في رواية رضوان بن أحمد الصيدلاني عن أحمد بن عبد الجبار عند ابن عساكر 58/ 395، فما جاء عند المصنف هنا غريبٌ.
Reference / Source: (3) This content is in Ibn Hisham's "al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah" (1/463-464), except that there he said: "Banu Salimah claimed him (as belonging to their tribe) because he was the maternal brother of Sahl bin Muhammad bin al-Jadd bin Qays bin Sakhrah."
Details of the narration: It is the same in all the other narrations from Muhammad bin Ishaq, and likewise in the narration of Ridwan bin Ahmad al-Saydalani (from Ahmad bin 'Abd al-Jabbar) in Ibn 'Asakir (58/395).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): So the text that appears here with the author (Imam al-Hakim) is "gharib" (unusual).
وزاد سائر أصحاب ابن إسحاق في نسب معاذ بن جبل أُدَيًّا قبل سعد، وهو قول ابن الكلبي وشَبَاب وموسى بن عُقبة فيما قاله ابن عساكر 58/ 393، فهو المعروف في نَسبِه. واختُلف في غَنْم، فذكر ابن هشام في "السيرة النبوية" 1/ 463 عن زياد البكائي عن ابن إسحاق بدلًا من غَنْم عَمْرًا. وربما ذكر عديًا بدله، والمعروف في هذا النسب عَمْرو، وأسقط سائرُ أصحاب ابن إسحاق اسمَ هذا الرجل من هذا النسب، والصحيح ذكرُه.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): All the other students of Ibn Ishaq added "Udayy" before "Sa'd" in the lineage of Mu'adh bin Jabal (may Allah be pleased with him). This is also the view of Ibn al-Kalbi, Shabab and Musa bin 'Uqbah, as Ibn 'Asakir (58/393) reported, and this is what is well known in his lineage.
Details of the narration: However, there is a difference over the name "Ghanm". Ibn Hisham in "al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah" (1/463), quoting Ibn Ishaq via Ziyad al-Bakka'i, mentioned "'Amr" in place of "Ghanm" (and sometimes "'Adi" is mentioned in its place), but in this lineage "'Amr" is what is well known.
Important point: The other students of Ibn Ishaq dropped this man's name ('Amr/Ghanm) from this lineage, whereas the correct view is that it should be mentioned.
Note / Clarification: (2) This name is with the (two-dotted) letter ta', as Imam al-Daraqutni recorded its vocalisation in "al-Mu'talif wa al-Mukhtalif" (1/180), and others likewise.
(3) وهو في "السيرة النبوية" لابن هشام 1/ 463 - 464 غير أنه قال: ادَّعته بنو سلمة لأنه كان أخا سهل بن محمد بن الجد بن قيس بن صخرة لأمِّه. وكذلك جاء في سائر الروايات عن محمد بن إسحاق، وكذلك جاء في رواية رضوان بن أحمد الصيدلاني عن أحمد بن عبد الجبار عند ابن عساكر 58/ 395، فما جاء عند المصنف هنا غريبٌ.
Reference / Source: (3) This content is in Ibn Hisham's "al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah" (1/463-464), except that there he said: "Banu Salimah claimed him (as belonging to their tribe) because he was the maternal brother of Sahl bin Muhammad bin al-Jadd bin Qays bin Sakhrah."
Details of the narration: It is the same in all the other narrations from Muhammad bin Ishaq, and likewise in the narration of Ridwan bin Ahmad al-Saydalani (from Ahmad bin 'Abd al-Jabbar) in Ibn 'Asakir (58/395).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): So the text that appears here with the author (Imam al-Hakim) is "gharib" (unusual).
وزاد سائر أصحاب ابن إسحاق في نسب معاذ بن جبل أُدَيًّا قبل سعد، وهو قول ابن الكلبي وشَبَاب وموسى بن عُقبة فيما قاله ابن عساكر 58/ 393، فهو المعروف في نَسبِه. واختُلف في غَنْم، فذكر ابن هشام في "السيرة النبوية" 1/ 463 عن زياد البكائي عن ابن إسحاق بدلًا من غَنْم عَمْرًا. وربما ذكر عديًا بدله، والمعروف في هذا النسب عَمْرو، وأسقط سائرُ أصحاب ابن إسحاق اسمَ هذا الرجل من هذا النسب، والصحيح ذكرُه.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): All the other students of Ibn Ishaq added "Udayy" before "Sa'd" in the lineage of Mu'adh bin Jabal (may Allah be pleased with him). This is also the view of Ibn al-Kalbi, Shabab and Musa bin 'Uqbah, as Ibn 'Asakir (58/393) reported, and this is what is well known in his lineage.
Details of the narration: However, there is a difference over the name "Ghanm". Ibn Hisham in "al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah" (1/463), quoting Ibn Ishaq via Ziyad al-Bakka'i, mentioned "'Amr" in place of "Ghanm" (and sometimes "'Adi" is mentioned in its place), but in this lineage "'Amr" is what is well known.
Important point: The other students of Ibn Ishaq dropped this man's name ('Amr/Ghanm) from this lineage, whereas the correct view is that it should be mentioned.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 5249
