Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب معرفة الصحابة رضي الله تعالى عنهم
Book of Knowing the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)
خِلَافَةُ النُّبُوَّةِ ثَلَاثُونَ سَنَةً .
The caliphate of prophethood is thirty years
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4749
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو بكر بن إسحاق، أخبرنا عبد الله بن أحمد بن حنبل، حدثنا عمرو بن عبد الله الأَوْدي، حدثنا محمد بن بِشر، عن موسى بن مُطَير، عن صَعْصعة بن صُوحان، قال: خَطَبَنا عليٌّ حين ضربَه ابن مُلجَم، فقلنا: يا أمير المؤمنين، استَخِلفْ علينا، فقال: أتركُكُم كما تركَنا رسولُ الله ﷺ، قلنا: يا رسول الله، استَخِلفْ علينا، فقال: "إنْ يَعلمِ اللهُ فيكم خيرًا يولِّ عليكم خِيارَكم". قال عليٌّ: فعَلِم اللهُ فينا خيرًا فولّى علينا أبا بكر (1).
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4698 - حذفه الذهبي من التلخيص لضعفه
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4698 - حذفه الذهبي من التلخيص لضعفه
It is narrated from Sa'sa'ah bin Suhan that when Ibn Muljam made the murderous attack on Sayyiduna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him), he addressed us, and we said: O Commander of the Faithful! Appoint a successor over us. He said: "I am leaving you in the same state in which the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) left us." We had (earlier) said: O Messenger of Allah! Appoint a successor over us, and he (peace and blessings be upon him) had said: "If Allah knows good in you, He will appoint the best of you as ruler over you." Sayyiduna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "So Allah saw good in us and made Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) our leader."
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) إسناده ضعيف جدًّا من أجل موسى بن مُطَير، فهو متروك الحديث، وكذّبه ابن مَعِين، ويغلب على الظن أنه سقط من إسناده هنا عند المصنف ذكر مُطَير والد موسى، فقد زاده في الإسناد أحمد بن حازم بن أبي غَرَزة في روايته عن محمد بن بشر - وهو الأسدي الحريري - عند خيثمة بن سليمان الأطرابُلُسي في "حديثه" ص 131، وتابعه يعقوب بن تواب عند ابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق" 30/ 289. وإذا ثبت ذلك فمُطَير هذا هو ابن أبي خالد، وهو ضعيف أيضًا. وقد روي من طريق آخر عند المصنف بعده عن صعصعة بن صوحان إلّا أنَّ في الإسناد إليه رجلًا متروكًا وآخر ضعيفًا.
Grading: Its chain is "very weak" because of Musa bin Mutayr; he is "matruk al-hadith" and Ibn Ma'in called him a liar.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): It is most likely that here, with the author (al-Hakim), the name of "Mutayr" (Musa's father) has dropped out of the chain, because in Khaythamah bin Sulayman's book "Hadithuhu" (p. 131) Ahmad bin Hazim, narrating from Muhammad bin Bishr (al-Asadi al-Hariri), included him in the chain, and with Ibn 'Asakir (30/ 289) Ya'qub bin Tawwab corroborated him. If this is established, then he is "Mutayr bin Abi Khalid", and he too is "da'if". Further on, the author also has this hadith by another route from Sa'sa'ah bin Suhan, but its chain too contains one "matruk" and one "da'if" narrator.
وقد تقدَّم من وجه آخر عن عليّ برقم (4517)، وهو ضعيف، وانظر ما سلف برقم (4608).
Reference / Source: This hadith has passed from 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) by another route at no. (4517), and it is weak; see also no. (4608).
Grading: Its chain is "very weak" because of Musa bin Mutayr; he is "matruk al-hadith" and Ibn Ma'in called him a liar.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): It is most likely that here, with the author (al-Hakim), the name of "Mutayr" (Musa's father) has dropped out of the chain, because in Khaythamah bin Sulayman's book "Hadithuhu" (p. 131) Ahmad bin Hazim, narrating from Muhammad bin Bishr (al-Asadi al-Hariri), included him in the chain, and with Ibn 'Asakir (30/ 289) Ya'qub bin Tawwab corroborated him. If this is established, then he is "Mutayr bin Abi Khalid", and he too is "da'if". Further on, the author also has this hadith by another route from Sa'sa'ah bin Suhan, but its chain too contains one "matruk" and one "da'if" narrator.
وقد تقدَّم من وجه آخر عن عليّ برقم (4517)، وهو ضعيف، وانظر ما سلف برقم (4608).
Reference / Source: This hadith has passed from 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) by another route at no. (4517), and it is weak; see also no. (4608).
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4749
