Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب المغازي والسرايا
Book of Military Expeditions and Raids
نِدَاءُ عَلِيٍّ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ فِي مَوْسِمِ الْحَجِّ بِبَرَاءَةٍ
Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) proclaiming Bara'ah during the Hajj season
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4422
اُردوEn
حدَّثنا أحمد بن كامل القاضي، حدَّثنا أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى البِرْتي، حدَّثنا إسحاق بن بِشْر الكاهِلي، حدَّثنا محمد بن فُضيل، عن سالم بن أبي حَفْصة، عن جُميع بن عُمير اللَّيثي، قال: أتيتُ عبد الله بن عمر فسألتُه عن عليٍّ فانتَهرَني، ثم قال: ألا أُحدِّثك عن عليّ: هذا بيتُ رسولِ الله ﷺ في المسجدِ، وهذا بيت عليٍّ، إنَّ رسولَ الله ﷺ بَعَثَ أبا بكر وعُمر ببراءةَ إلى أهلِ مكة، فانطلقا، فإذا هما براكِبٍ، فقالا: مَن هذا؟ قال: أنا عليٌّ، فقال: يا أبا بكر، هاتِ الكتابَ الذي معك، قال أبو بكر: وما لي يا عليّ؟! قال: والله ما عَلِمتُ إِلَّا خيرًا، فأخذ عليٌّ الكتابَ فذهبَ به، ورجعَ أبو بكر وعُمر إلى المدينة، فقالا: ما لنا يا رسول الله؟! قال: "ما لكما إِلَّا خيرٌ، ولكن قيل لي: إنه لا يُبلِّغُ عنك إلَّا أنت أو رجلٌ منك" (1).
هذا حديث شاذٌّ والحَمْلُ فيه على جُميع بن عُمير، وبعده على إسحاق بن بِشْر.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4374 - شاذ
هذا حديث شاذٌّ والحَمْلُ فيه على جُميع بن عُمير، وبعده على إسحاق بن بِشْر.
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4374 - شاذ
It is narrated from Jumay' bin Umayr al-Laythi that he said: I came to Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) and asked him about Ali (may Allah be pleased with him), and he rebuked me. Then he said: "Shall I not tell you about Ali? This is the house of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) in the Mosque, and this is the house of Ali (may Allah be pleased with him). The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) sent Abu Bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) with Surah Bara'ah to the people of Makkah. They set off, and they saw a rider. They asked: 'Who is this?' He said: 'I am Ali.' Ali said: 'O Abu Bakr! Hand over the document (letter) that you have with you.' Abu Bakr asked: 'O Ali! Has something happened concerning me?' Ali said: 'By Allah! I know nothing but good.' So Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) took the document and went off with it, while Abu Bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) returned to Madinah and said: 'O Messenger of Allah! What is the matter concerning us?' He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: 'There is nothing for you but good, but I have been told that none shall convey (this message) on your behalf except you yourself or a man from you.'"
This hadith is shadhdh (anomalous), and the cause of its weakness is Jumay' bin Umayr and, after him, Ishaq bin Bishr.
This hadith is shadhdh (anomalous), and the cause of its weakness is Jumay' bin Umayr and, after him, Ishaq bin Bishr.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(1) إسناده ضعيف جدًّا من أجل إسحاق بن بشر الكاهلي، فهو هالك وكذَّبه غير واحدٍ، وجُميع بن عُمير ضعيف، ولا ينزل إلى درجة من يُتّهم كما أطلقه الذهبي في "تلخيصه" عليه غير مرة، ولم ينفردا بهذا الخبر، فقد تابع إسحاق بن بشر على الشطر الثاني منه في إرسال عليٍّ ببراءة محمدُ ابن سعيد بن الأصبهاني وغيره عند الطحاوي في "شرح مشكل الآثار" (3587)، فيبقى الشأن في جُميع بن عُمير، لكنه لم ينفرد به أيضًا، فقد رُوي الشطر الأول من الخبر في ذكر قرب بيت عليّ من بيت النبي ﷺ في المسجد من غير وجه، وكذلك الشطر الثاني منه مرويٌّ من وجوه كما سيأتي بيانه عند تخريج الحديث (4702)، وإنما شَذَّ جُميعٌ هنا بذكر عُمر بن الخطاب، إذ المحفوظ في القصة ذكر أبي بكر وحسب، فقد روى هذه القصة أيضًا عبد الله بن عمر العُمري، عن نافع، عن ابن عمر عند الطبري، كما قال الحافظ في "الفتح" 13/ 327، بذكر أبي بكر وحده، وإسناده حسن في الشواهد، وكذلك روى هذه القصة غير واحدٍ من الصحابة من سيأتي ذكرهم عند تخريج الحديث (4702) بذكر أبي بكر فقط، وعليه فحُكم الذهبي في "تلخيصه" على هذا الخبر بالوضع على إطلاقه غير مسلّم له البتّة، والله تعالى أعلم.
Grading: Its chain is "extremely weak" (da'if jiddan) because of Ishaq bin Bishr al-Kahili; he is a ruined narrator, and several imams declared him a liar.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Jumay' bin Umayr is also weak, but he is not of the level to be accused (of lying), as al-Dhahabi applied that to him several times in the "Talkhis".
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Ishaq bin Bishr is not alone in this report; rather, on the second part of the hadith (sending Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) with Surah Bara'ah) Muhammad bin Sa'id bin al-Asbahani and others corroborated him in al-Tahawi's "Sharh Mushkil al-Athar" (3587). The real issue is Jumay' bin Umayr, but he too is not alone, because the mention that Ali's (may Allah be pleased with him) house was near the Prophet's (peace and blessings be upon him) house in the mosque (the first part) and the second part are narrated through several other routes, as will come in the takhrij of hadith (4702).
Important point: The "shadh" element from Jumay' bin Umayr here is that he mentioned Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), whereas what is "preserved" (established) in this story is the mention of Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) alone. In al-Tabari's narration of Abd Allah bin Umar al-Umari from Nafi' from Ibn Umar (as al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in "al-Fath" 13/ 327), only Abu Bakr is mentioned, and its chain is "hasan" as a supporting report.
Summary of the research: Al-Dhahabi's ruling of this narration as absolutely "fabricated" (mawdu') is not acceptable, because many of its parts are established by other supporting reports.
Grading: Its chain is "extremely weak" (da'if jiddan) because of Ishaq bin Bishr al-Kahili; he is a ruined narrator, and several imams declared him a liar.
Technical note / Defect ('illah): Jumay' bin Umayr is also weak, but he is not of the level to be accused (of lying), as al-Dhahabi applied that to him several times in the "Talkhis".
Corroborating chains and supporting reports: Ishaq bin Bishr is not alone in this report; rather, on the second part of the hadith (sending Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) with Surah Bara'ah) Muhammad bin Sa'id bin al-Asbahani and others corroborated him in al-Tahawi's "Sharh Mushkil al-Athar" (3587). The real issue is Jumay' bin Umayr, but he too is not alone, because the mention that Ali's (may Allah be pleased with him) house was near the Prophet's (peace and blessings be upon him) house in the mosque (the first part) and the second part are narrated through several other routes, as will come in the takhrij of hadith (4702).
Important point: The "shadh" element from Jumay' bin Umayr here is that he mentioned Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), whereas what is "preserved" (established) in this story is the mention of Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) alone. In al-Tabari's narration of Abd Allah bin Umar al-Umari from Nafi' from Ibn Umar (as al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in "al-Fath" 13/ 327), only Abu Bakr is mentioned, and its chain is "hasan" as a supporting report.
Summary of the research: Al-Dhahabi's ruling of this narration as absolutely "fabricated" (mawdu') is not acceptable, because many of its parts are established by other supporting reports.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4422
