Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب : تواريخ المتقدمين من الأنبياء والمرسلين
Book of the Histories of the Earlier Prophets and Messengers
بَيَانُ الِاخْتِلَافِ فِي أَنَّ الذَّبِيحَ إِسْمَاعِيلُ أَوْ إِسْحَاقُ
Explanation of the disagreement over whether the one to be sacrificed was Ismail or Ishaq (peace be upon them)
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 4081
اُردوEn
حدثنا أبو العباس محمد بن يعقوب، حدثنا بحر بن نصر الخَوْلاني، حدثنا عبد الله بن وهب، أخبرني عُمر بن قيس، عن عطاء بن أبي رباح، عن عبد الله بن عبّاس أنه قال: المُفدَّى إسماعيل، وزَعَمتِ اليهود أنه إسحاق وكَذَبتِ اليهود (2).
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4037 - سمعه ابن وهب منه يعني من عمر بن قيس وهو هالك
[التعليق - من تلخيص الذهبي] ترقيم العلميه 4037 - سمعه ابن وهب منه يعني من عمر بن قيس وهو هالك
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) that he said: "The one who was ransomed (that is, the Dhabih) is Isma'il (peace be upon him). The Jews have claimed that he is Ishaq (peace be upon him), but the Jews have lied."
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.
(2) إسناده واهٍ من أجل عمر بن قيس - وهو المكي، المعروف بسندل - فهو متروك الحديث وكذبه مالك. ويُغني عن روايته هذه رواية غيره ممن رواه عن ابن عبّاس، كما تقدم برقم (3654) و (4078)، وكما سيأتي بعده.
Grading: Its chain is "wahin" (very weak).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is "'Umar bin Qays" (al-Makki, known as "Sandal"). He is "matruk al-hadith" (abandoned in hadith), and Malik called him a liar. His narration here is made unnecessary by the narration of others who narrated it from Ibn 'Abbas, as appeared at numbers (3654) and (4078), and as will come next.
وأخرجه الطبري في "تفسيره" 23/ 84، وفي "تاريخه" 1/ 268 عن يونس بن عبد الأعلى، عن عبد الله بن وهب بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Al-Tabari narrated it in his "Tafsir" (23/84) and "Tarikh" (1/268) from Yunus bin 'Abd al-A'la, from 'Abdullah bin Wahb, with this same chain.
Grading: Its chain is "wahin" (very weak).
Technical note / Defect ('illah): The reason is "'Umar bin Qays" (al-Makki, known as "Sandal"). He is "matruk al-hadith" (abandoned in hadith), and Malik called him a liar. His narration here is made unnecessary by the narration of others who narrated it from Ibn 'Abbas, as appeared at numbers (3654) and (4078), and as will come next.
وأخرجه الطبري في "تفسيره" 23/ 84، وفي "تاريخه" 1/ 268 عن يونس بن عبد الأعلى، عن عبد الله بن وهب بهذا الإسناد.
Reference / Source: Al-Tabari narrated it in his "Tafsir" (23/84) and "Tarikh" (1/268) from Yunus bin 'Abd al-A'la, from 'Abdullah bin Wahb, with this same chain.
Source: Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (Takhrij & Tahqiq: Shaykh Adil Murshid et al.), Page: 4081
