Qadianism:
This is the group of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, who are called Mirzai, and they call themselves Ahmadi. Some of their specific beliefs are mentioned and refuted.
Denial of the Finality of Prophethood
From the Salaf to the Khalaf, it has been the unanimously agreed belief among Muslims that Muhammad Kareem ﷺ is the last Prophet and Messenger of Allah Almighty, and with his coming, the chain of prophethood ended and was cut off. After him, no prophet has come nor will come until the Day of Judgment. Whoever considers the coming of a new prophet permissible or calls or regards anyone as a prophet, such a person has been unanimously declared a disbeliever by Muslims without any disagreement.
And whoever claims prophethood after the Messenger of Allah ﷺ is a liar and an impostor.
Despite these declarations, a few false individuals emerged who claimed prophethood and used much deceit and trickery, but ultimately, by virtue of (إِنَّ الْبَاطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقًا), they met their due punishment. About a century ago, in the city of Qadian in the united Punjab, district Gurdaspur, a person named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed prophethood. He too ultimately faced his worst end. Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Sanaullah Amritsar ؒ refuted him thoroughly in his newspaper “Ahl-e-Hadith” Amritsar and continuously disproved his ideas and revealed his reality by authoring numerous books.
A Tragic Outcome Through Mubahala
Finally, Mirza, fed up, published an advertisement that proved truth and falsehood beyond doubt. Here, as a lesson and admonition, Mirza Qadiani’s mentioned advertisement is written verbatim.
“The Final Decision with Maulvi Sanaullah”
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم نحمدہ ونصلى على رسوله الكريم وَ یَسْتَنْۢبوْنَكَ اَحَقٌّ هُوَ قُلْ اِیْ وَرَبِّیْۤ اِنَّهٗ لَحَقٌّ۔
To Maulvi Sanaullah Sahib. وَالسَّلَامُ عَلَىٰ مَنِ اتَّبَعَ الْهُدَىٰ. For a long time, your pamphlet in Ahl-e-Hadith has been continuously denying and refuting me. You always attribute to me in your pamphlets names like rejected, liar, deceiver, corrupter, and spread the reputation in the world that this person is a fabricator and deceiver, and his claim of being the Promised Messiah is a complete falsehood. I have suffered much from you and remained patient. But since I see that I am appointed to spread the truth and you, by making many accusations against me, prevent the world from turning towards me and remember me with those abuses and accusations and words harsher than any other word, if I am indeed such a liar and fabricator as you often mention me in every pamphlet, then I will perish in your lifetime. Because I know that a corrupter and liar does not live long. And in the end, with humiliation and regret, he perishes unsuccessfully in the lifetime of his worst enemies, and his destruction is better so that he does not destroy God’s servants. And if I am not a liar and fabricator and am honored with communication and discourse from God and am the Promised Messiah, then by God’s grace, I hope that you will not escape the punishment of the deniers according to the command of God. So if that punishment, which is not from human hands but only from God’s hands, such as plague, cholera, and other deadly diseases, does not befall you in my lifetime, then I am not from God. This is not a prophecy from any revelation or inspiration, but merely a prayer. I have sought judgment from God and I pray to God: O my Lord, the All-Seeing and All-Powerful, the All-Knowing and All-Aware, who knows the conditions of my heart. If this claim of being the Promised Messiah is merely a falsehood of my own self and I am a corrupter and liar in Your sight and making false accusations day and night is my work, then O my beloved Lord! I humbly pray before You to destroy me in the lifetime of Maulvi Sanaullah and make him and his group happy with my death. Amen! But O my perfect and truthful God! If Maulvi Sanaullah is not truthful in these accusations he makes against me, then I humbly pray before You to destroy him in my lifetime, but not by human hands, rather by plague, cholera, or other deadly diseases, except in the case that he openly curses me and my community with all those abuses and foul language which he considers his duty and always causes me pain with. آمین یارب العالمین. I have been greatly tormented by him and remained patient. But now I see that his foul language has crossed all limits. He considers me worse than those thieves and robbers whose existence causes great harm to the world, and he has not followed the verse لا تقف مالیس لک بہ علم in these accusations and foul language and has considered me worse than the entire world and spread this reputation far and wide that this person is in fact a corrupter, cheat, shopkeeper, liar, fabricator, and a very bad person. Otherwise, if such words did not have a bad effect on seekers of truth, I would have been patient with these accusations. I see that Maulvi Sanaullah wants to destroy my movement through these accusations, wants to demolish this building which You, O my Master! and my Sender have built with Your own hands. Therefore, I hold on to Your sanctity and mercy and beseech You to make a true judgment between me and Sanaullah and remove from the world in the lifetime of the truthful one the one who is truly a corrupter and liar in Your sight, or afflict him with some other very severe calamity equivalent to death. O my beloved Lord! Do so. آمین ثم آمین۔ رَبَّنَا افْتَحْ بَیْنَنَا وَ بَیْنَ قَوْمِنَا بِالْحَقِّ وَ اَنْتَ خَیْرُ الْفٰتِحِیْنَ آمین. Finally, a request to Maulvi Sahib to publish this article in his pamphlet and write whatever he wishes below it. Now the decision is in God’s hands.”
Later, in the Qadiani newspaper “Badr” in Qadian, Mirza’s daily diary was published as follows:
What was written about Sanaullah is actually not from us but is based on God’s own foundation. Once our attention was drawn to him and at night the attention was on him and at night the inspiration came that اُجِیْبُ دَعْوَةَ الدَّاعِ اِذَا دَعَانِۙ. According to the Sufis, the miracle is the acceptance of prayer; all else are its branches.
Readers! It is clear that Mirza prayed to Allah Almighty regarding this decisive matter, so Allah Almighty also gave the decision. Thus, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani passed away from plague disease during the lifetime of his enemy Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari
while Sheikh-ul-Islam Fatah Qadian Maulana Shau’ullah Amritsari, may Allah have mercy on him, continued to promote and propagate Islam for another forty years and passed away in 1948 corresponding to 1367 AH in the city of Sargodha.
It was written: The liar will die first
He was sure in lying, he died first
Semantic Distortion in the Verses
The followers of the false Mirza made great cunning deceptions to erase this famous and established Islamic belief and, instead of accepting the belief in the finality of Prophethood, they committed the impure audacity of semantic distortion in the Quran and Hadith. They specially targeted a few verses of the Holy Quran. A detailed response to these verses will, God willing, be given in our Tafseer Badee’ al-Atfaseer at the appropriate place. Here it is intended to point out that from this verse of Surah Al-Fatiha ( صِرَاطَ الَّذِينَ أَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِمْ – – – ), these people make semantic distortion and argue as follows: “There are four categories of the favored group: Prophet, Siddiq (truthful), Martyr, and Righteous people. In this supplication, we ask Allah to include us among the favored people, which means that the chain of Prophethood continues; otherwise, supplication would be futile.”
No Mention of Inclusion in the Group of Prophets
Answer:- Firstly:-
Here, it is not mentioned to join this group, but rather to be with this group, meaning to accompany them. In this prayer, the ability to follow their path is sought, not the request to become a prophet, because this path belongs only to Allah. As He has said:
وَ اِنَّكَ لَتَهْدِیْۤ اِلٰى صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِیْمٍ(52)صِرَاطِ اللّٰهِ الَّذِیْ لَهٗ مَا فِی السَّمٰوٰتِ وَ مَا فِی الْاَرْضِؕ
And indeed, you ﷺ are guiding to the straight path, the path of Allah, to whom belongs whatever is in the heavens and the earth:
وَ اَنَّ هٰذَا صِرَاطِیْ مُسْتَقِیْمًا
“And indeed, this is my straight path.” So, does this prayer also request that we be granted divinity? God forbid.
Secondly:
Rather, Allah is the One who appoints the path, and the ones who reveal it are the Prophets. Allah has sealed the chain of prophethood with Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Being with the Prophets will be attained on the Day of Judgment
Thirdly:
The verse in which the rewarded groups are mentioned, that is:
فَاُولٰٓىٕكَ مَعَ الَّذِیْنَ اَنْعَمَ اللّٰهُ عَلَیْهِمْ مِّنَ النَّبِیّٖنَ وَ الصِّدِّیْقِیْنَ وَ الشُّهَدَآءِ وَ الصّٰلِحِیْنَۚ-وَ حَسُنَ اُولٰٓىٕكَ رَفِیْقًا
They will be with those upon whom Allah has bestowed favor, meaning the Prophets, the truthful, the martyrs, and the righteous. This companionship will be attained on the Day of Judgment, and there is no question of any new prophethood there.
The Prophets came in this world, so this verse has no relation to them. This is merely a misconception and deception of the Murji’ah.
Prophethood is not attained through prayers and supplications
Fourthly:
The attainment of prophethood is not dependent on prayers and supplications, rather the Prophet himself does not have any illusion or hope about being a prophet. As it is said:
وَ مَا كُنْتَ تَرْجُوْۤا اَنْ یُّلْقٰۤى اِلَیْكَ الْكِتٰبُ
“You (ﷺ) never even thought that the Book would be revealed to you.” Therefore, this argument is completely wrong.
Fifthly:
In fact, it was the disbelievers who said that we will only believe in the Prophet when we also receive what they have received. But Allah Almighty rejected this, saying that it is not according to your desire, but the Lord grants prophethood to whomever He deems worthy:
قَالُوْا لَنْ نُّؤْمِنَ حَتّٰى نُؤْتٰى مِثْلَ مَاۤ اُوْتِیَ رُسُلُ اللّٰهِ ﲪ اَللّٰهُ اَعْلَمُ حَیْثُ یَجْعَلُ رِسَالَتَهٗؕ
“They say, ‘We will never believe until we are given like that which was given to the messengers of Allah.’ Allah knows best where to place His message.” So when Allah Almighty ended the chain of prophethood, then what is the desire or prayer for it? And the sixth.
The Continuation of Three Chains
Seventhly:
Allah Almighty has mentioned the continuation of three other types of chains. As stated:
وَ الَّذِیْنَ اٰمَنُوْا بِاللّٰهِ وَ رُسُلِهٖۤ اُولٰٓىٕكَ هُمُ الصِّدِّیْقُوْنَ وَ الشُّهَدَآءُ عِنْدَ رَبِّهِمْؕ
“Those who believe in Allah and His Messenger, they are the truthful and the martyrs in the sight of their Lord.”
He also said:
وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَعَمِلُواْ ٱلصَّٰلِحَٰتِ لَنُدْخِلَنَّهُمْ فِى ٱلصَّٰلِحِينَ
“And those who believe and do righteous deeds, I will surely admit them among My righteous servants.”
It is understood that truthful ones, martyrs, and righteous people will continue to exist in this Ummah, but this is not said about prophethood. Rather, it is stated:
مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ اَبَاۤ اَحَدٍ مِّنْ رِّجَالِكُمْ وَ لٰـكِنْ رَّسُوْلَ اللّٰهِ وَ خَاتَمَ النَّبِیّٖنَؕ
“(O people!) Muhammad (ﷺ) is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of all the Prophets.”
There are countless supplications
Eighth:
Even if all these answers are overlooked, it is sufficient to note that the Holy Quran and the blessed Hadiths contain countless supplications, mentioning prayers for every small and big need. Some have asked for knowledge, some for kingship, some for offspring, some for healing from illness, some have sought guidance, some have sought refuge from enemies, some have asked for solutions to difficulties, some have sought relief from calamities. But no one has ever asked for prophethood. Then, if even those who were blessed did not ask for this, how can it be correct to assume that others should desire it?
The Prophethood of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم is before the revelation of Al-Fatiha
Ninthly:
Before the revelation of Surah Al-Fatiha, the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ had already been granted prophethood. So if this supplication is asking for prophethood, then what exactly was the Prophet ﷺ praying for? It is also incorrect to say that it means “keep me steadfast in prophethood,” because Allah Almighty does not grant prophethood to anyone and then take it back. Prophethood is only taken away from someone who proves to be unworthy, and this is against the knowledge of Allah that He would give prophethood to a person and later find out that he is unfit. Nor can it be said that the Prophet ﷺ or any other prophet, may Allah protect us, had any doubt about their prophethood being taken away later. حاشاللہ
In summary:
The Prophet ﷺ was granted prophethood without asking for it, and this supplication does not mean asking for prophethood. That is the tenth point.
Are all those who recite this supplication prophets?
Eleventh:
The Companions of the Prophet ﷺ, the four Caliphs, and all other Companions used to recite Surah Al-Fatiha in prayer and continued to supplicate, yet none of them became a Prophet. It is proven that the supplication is not for prophethood but rather for following the way of the Prophet ﷺ. Therefore, by the grace and bounty of Allah Almighty, they truly possessed such a complete blessing. Otherwise, according to the Mirzai claim, if this supplication were for seeking prophethood, then it is worth considering that when such supplications of the Companions were not accepted, how could Mirza Qadiani and his followers see such dreams? Rather, if the supplication of one Companion was not accepted, that would be one thing, but the entire group of Companions’ supplications not being accepted clearly shows that the supplication is not for the grant of prophethood, nor did the Companions make such a supplication. حاشا ہم اللہ من ذالک Nor is it the kind of supplication that would be made, because the chain of prophethood has ended. That is the eleventh,
Are those women who make this supplication also Prophets?
And the thirteenth:
From the early generations of this Ummah to the later ones, from the time of prophethood until today, Muslim women have also been reciting this prayer and reciting Surah Al-Fatiha in their prayers, yet no woman has attained the rank of prophethood. It is proven that this is merely a fabricated argument by the Mirzai sect with no truth.
Half of Mirza’s Prayer is Rejected!
And the fourteenth:
Just as prophethood is a blessing, so too is kingship and governance a blessing. Therefore, the blessing sought in this prayer includes prophethood along with other blessings, and Mirza Qadiani must have certainly recited this prayer. Thus, half of Mirza’s prayer was accepted and half was rejected. Because according to his optimistic assumption, he received prophethood but did not receive kingship; he remained a slave to the British until the end.
There is No Need for Prophethood
Fifteenth:
Prophethood is a blessing, and prophethood along with Shariah is a double blessing. The Mirzai say that Mirza Qadiani, the owner of Shariah, is not a prophet but rather a shadowy, apparent prophet who completes and explains the Shariah of Muhammad. Then why was Mirza Qadiani deprived of this double blessing? If you say that the Shariah was completed with the completion of the Holy Quran, and therefore there is no need for another Shariah after it, then we say that if the Shariah of a prophet is complete, then there is no need for another prophet after him. The comprehensiveness of the Holy Quran and its contents also show how the Lord of the Worlds, who is worthy of all praise and glorification, sent such a law after which there was no need for any other law or prophethood. Therefore, claiming new prophethood or messengership is outright rebellion against the divine law and disbelief in the Owner of the Day of Judgment.
Sixteenth:
Even if we ignore all these answers, the Mirzai argument is neither a text (nass), nor an inference, nor the wording of the text, nor the indication of the text, nor the implication of the text.
Seventeenth:
Even if we accept this much linguistically, it is an inference but by no means a text (proof). There are explicit and clear texts regarding the belief in the finality of prophethood, and Mirza Qadiani himself writes in “Izala-e-Awham” page 307 about the meaning of the verse of Khatam an-Nabiyyin that it means “the one who seals the prophets.” And inference against a text is rejected and unacceptable.
This prayer is not for any specific individual
Eighteenth:
This prayer is not for any specific individual; rather, every Muslim recites it, even sinners and immoral people keep reciting it. So, will they all be prophets? If they are all prophets, then who will be the followers?
Nineteenth:
In Tirmidhi and others, there is a hadith:
التَّاجِرُ الصَّدُوقُ الأَمِينُ مَعَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَالصِّدِّيقِينَ وَالشُّهَدَاءِ»ٍ.
Meaning, a truthful and trustworthy trader will be with the prophets, the truthful ones, and the martyrs. And in this verse also:
فَاُولٰٓىٕكَ مَعَ الَّذِیْنَ اَنْعَمَ اللّٰهُ عَلَیْهِمْ مِّنَ النَّبِیّٖنَ وَ الصِّدِّیْقِیْنَ وَ الشُّهَدَآءِ وَ الصّٰلِحِیْنَۚ
According to the reasoning of the Murji’ah, no trader has ever been a prophet. It is proven that the Murji’ah’s reasoning is incorrect.
Deception from the word “with”
Al-Muwafi lil-‘Ishreen:
Originally, the Murzai (followers of Mirza) deceive with the word “مع” (with), but it should be clearly understood that it does not mean that they will reach the rank of Prophets; rather, it means that they will remain in their company. The explanation of this is given in the verse itself because in the previous verse of Surah An-Nisa, it is further stated: “وَ حَسُنَ اُولٰٓىٕكَ رَفِیْقًاﭤ” and the companionship of those people is the best.
In conclusion:
The argument of the Murzai is extremely weak and outdated. Mirza Qadiani himself does not take this meaning; accordingly, in his book ”
” he writes:
“So when you are in prayer or outside of prayer and recite this supplication: اهْدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ صِرَاطَ الَّذِينَ انْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِم, keep in your heart that I seek the path of the companions and the community of the Promised Messiah.” It is proven that Mirza Qadiani himself did not intend the meaning that his blind predecessors did, but what can be done:
What was thought to be a grandson turned out not to be one.
This was the Murzai’s own mental invention whose reality has been clarified. والله الموفق والهادي إلى سواء السبيل
Considering Mirza Qadiani as a Prophet
The followers of this sect consider Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a prophet, and the above-mentioned refutation of the belief also refutes this. Secondly, certain incidents occurred with Mirza Qadiani that neither a prophet nor even an honorable person can accept, for example: lying:
Explicit Lies of Mirza Qadiani
In Shahadat al-Mulhimeen, page 34, Mirza writes:
Look! Allah Almighty has clearly stated in the Holy Quran that there is no greater oppressor than the one who fabricates lies against Me, and I quickly seize the fabricator. I do not give him respite.
This is a clear lie. Allah Almighty has not stated this anywhere in the Holy Quran; rather, He has mentioned respite for the fabricator. Accordingly, it is stated:
قُلْ إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَفْتَرُونَ عَلَى اللَّهِ الْكَذِبَ لَا يُفْلِحُونَ (69) مَتَاعٌ فِي الدُّنْيَا ثُمَّ إِلَيْنَا مَرْجِعُهُمْ ثُمَّ نُذِيقُهُمُ الْعَذَابَ الشَّدِيدَ بِمَا كَانُوا يَكْفُرُونَ (70) (Yunus)
Say, “Whoever invents a lie against Allah will not succeed. A little enjoyment in this world, then to Us is their return, and We will make them taste the punishment for their disbelief.”
From this verse, it is clear that Allah grants respite in this world to those who fabricate lies against Him.
In the second edition, he writes:
The Holy Prophet ﷺ was asked when the Day of Judgment would come, and he replied that the Day of Judgment would come upon all of mankind within a hundred years from today.
This is also a blatant lie and a slander against the Messenger of Allah ﷺ; these words are not found in any hadith. Mirza Qadiani
writes:
“The revelations of previous prophets have sealed the fact that he (the Promised Messiah) will be born at the beginning of the fourteenth century and also that he will be in Punjab.”
This is also an outright lie; no such revelation is narrated from any prophet.
In the second edition, he writes:
“Bukhari states that a voice will come from the sky for him (the Promised Messiah, the Caliph) ھذا خلیفة الله المهدی.”
This is also absolutely false. Read Sahih Bukhari from beginning to end; there is no such mention.
In the second edition, he says:
“In Tafsir Thanai, it is written that Abu Huraira had an incomplete understanding of the Quran and that hadith scholars object to his narrations. Abu Huraira had the material for narration but had little part in narration and understanding.”
This is also a great lie; no such statement exists in Tafsir Thanai.
In Mirza’s Haqiqat al-Mahdi, p. 8, he writes:
“Three thousand or more of the blessed inspirations of this humble one, which do not oppose public peace, have been fulfilled.”
The author of the letters says that this book
was published, and in the pamphlet ”
, he writes:
“So, having received nearly one hundred and fifty prophecies from God during this period, I have witnessed clearly that they have been fulfilled.”
Readers:
Consider that here Mirza himself exposes his own lie. Now see what Mirza says about a liar himself. Accordingly,
states:
“If a person is proven to be a liar in one matter, then he cannot be trusted in other matters.”
states:
“Lying is no less than apostasy,” and
states:
“Lying and bearing false witness are equal.”
includes a couplet:
Cursed is the fabricator in the Book of God,
Not even a particle of honor is in his presence.
Readers:
Consider that according to Mirza’s own judgment, he belongs to the group of the accursed upon them, so much so that calling him an honorable person or a prophet is out of the question.
Mirza Qadiani’s Explicit Blasphemous Statements Against Islam
Besides, Mirza Qadiani has explicit statements against Islam, for example,
writes:
اعلموا ان فضل الله معى وان روح الله ينطق فى نفسی ”
Know that Allah’s grace is with me and the spirit of Allah speaks in my soul.”
writes his revelation:
” انت منی بمنزلة اولادی, meaning you are like my own children to me.”
writes:
“I saw in a dream that I am God; I became certain that I am He.”
And in Khutbah Nah
he writes:
” اعطیت صفة الاحياء والاقتناء من الرب الفعال,
meaning I have been granted the attribute by Allah Almighty to kill and give life.”
writes:
“اِنَّمَاۤ اَمْرُهٗۤ اِذَاۤ اَرَادَ شَیْــٴًـا اَنْ یَّقُوْلَ لَهٗ كُنْ فَیَكُوْنُ”
meaning O Mirza, your attribute is that whatever you intend to happen, by your word ‘Be’ it will happen, etc., etc.
All these are blasphemous beliefs that no Muslim can hold, so how can a person with such beliefs be a prophet? Whereas in the Lordship of رب العالمین, killing and giving life are included, and He has no partner in this; He is the owner of all, the rest are His property and His servants. So how can a servant have divine attributes and claim such attributes for himself? While Mirza himself was created by the command of Allah Almighty کن, then how can he make such claims?
Mirza’s Vulgarity and Abusive Language
Also, Mirza Qadiani’s foul language and abusive speech prove that he was not a moral person, so how could he be a prophet?
Accordingly,
in the second edition Mirza says:
كل مسلم يقبلنی في ويصدق دعوتی الاذرية المغایا۔
Meaning, except for the children of prostitutes, everyone else accepts and acknowledges me.
In “Najm al-Huda” p. 10 it is written:
ان العدى صار و خنازير الفلاة ونسائهم من دونهن الاكلب۔
Meaning, all my opponents are wild boars of the jungle and their women are worse than them.
”
” writes:
Wretched slanderers! Why does this savage sect not act with shame and modesty, blackening the faces of opposing clerics?
In ”
” it is written:
Some ignorant companions.
In ”
” p. 71 it is written:
Abu Huraira was stupid and did not have good understanding.
Regarding Maulana Nazir Hussain Muhaddith Dehlavi, ”
” p. 30 calls him incompetent and in ”
” it says “مات ضال ھائما” meaning he died misguided.
Maulana Sanaullah Sahib is called ”
” p. 26 Abu Jahl and in ”
” p. 25 a dog that eats carrion.
Similarly, regarding Maulvi Saadullah Ludhianvi, ”
” p. 30 calls him Hind-wazadah and in “Anjam Atham” pp. 82, 281:
Ghoul Lateem, sinner, cursed devil, impure sperm, wicked, corrupt, deceiver, ill-fated.
And about Maulana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, ”
” p. 133 says:
Filthy, shameless, and about Maulvi Abdul Haq Aznavi, ”
” p. 58 calls him a servant of Satan. There are many more such examples.
So, such a harsh-mouthed person who is not even fit to sit in a good gathering, how did he become a prophet of Allah? Rather, this is a deviation from the straight path. In the Tafsir of An’amta ‘Alayhim, in comparison to Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari, the advertisement mentioned in which he prayed for Allah’s wrath upon himself and ultimately became its victim, clearly shows that Mirza is among the accursed (Maghdub Alayhim). Then how are his followers and community dreaming of his prophethood?
An Excuse of the Mirzais
The Mirzais present an excuse here that Mirza Qadiani was not separately a lawgiver but rather the expresser and interpreter of that law.
Firstly:
Centuries had passed before Mirza during which Muslims continued to practice the Shariah. If the Shariah was not apparent and required some kind of interpretation, then how did they practice it? It is proven that this is the Mirzais’ pretense, deceit, and falsehood which has no connection with the straight path.
Secondly:
It is absolutely clear that Allah Almighty has completed the interpretation of the Shariah through the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, so Mirza Sahib’s interpretation is in reality a distortion and open rebellion against the Owner of the Day of Judgment.
Denial of the Life of Jesus (peace be upon him)
The famous belief of the Mirzais is that Jesus (peace be upon him) has died and will not return to the world again.
Firstly:
When Allah Almighty has explicitly stated in the Holy Quran and through the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ that Jesus (peace be upon him) has not died but is alive and will come to the world twice, to hold a belief contrary to this and to invite the creation of Allah to it is to doubt the perfect power of Allah Almighty, which undermines the system of Lordship and Sovereignty and is rebellion against the Owner of the Day of Judgment.
Secondly:
The life of Jesus (peace be upon him) is a consensus belief of Muslims, therefore holding a contrary belief is the path of مغضوب علیھم and الضالین.
We have mentioned the complete details of the belief in the life of Jesus (peace be upon him) in our Tafsir Badi’ al-Tafasir in the exegesis of Surah Al-Imran, An-Nisa, and Al-Ma’idah.
