Using Items Made by Non-Muslims – Islamic Guidelines and Legal Rulings

اردو میں پڑھیں
Font size:

Sharʿī Guidelines on Benefiting from the Possessions of Disbelievers (Kuffār)
📚 Taken from: Fatāwā Arkān-e-Islām

❖ Question:

How can a Muslim benefit from the possessions, technologies, or skills of disbelievers without involving oneself in impermissible activities?
Is the principle of “Maṣāliḥ Mursalah” (unrestricted public interest) relevant to this issue?

❖ Answer:

Alḥamdulillāh, waṣ-ṣalātu was-salāmu ‘alā Rasūlillāh. Ammā baʿd:

Disbelievers (kuffār), who are enemies of Allah ﷻ and the believers, produce many things. These can be broadly divided into three categories, and each has its own Sharʿī ruling:

➊ Religious Rituals and Worship (ʿIbādāt)

◈ It is strictly impermissible for a Muslim to imitate the religious practices or rituals of the disbelievers.
◈ Whoever imitates them in their acts of worship is exposed to great spiritual danger, and may even fall into disbelief (kufr) if the imitation affects foundational beliefs.

➋ Cultural Practices and Customs (ʿĀdāt)

◈ This includes clothing styles, personal habits, or social symbols.
◈ Imitating the disbelievers in such areas is also forbidden.

The Prophet ﷺ said:

«مَنْ تَشَبَّهَ بِقَوْمٍ فَهُوَ مِنْهُمْ»
“Whoever imitates a people is one of them.”
(Sunan Abī Dāwūd, Kitāb al-Libās, Ḥadīth: 4031)

➌ Benefiting from Their Technologies, Professions, or Useful Skills

◈ When it comes to industries, crafts, or useful tools and technologies that fulfill genuine public interest,
→ It is permissible to benefit from them and learn from their methods.

◈ This is not considered prohibited imitation; rather, it falls under the mutual utilization of beneficial resources.

✅ A person who engages in this is not considered to be imitating the disbelievers in a forbidden sense, but is instead partaking in what is beneficial for society.

➍ Regarding “Maṣāliḥ Mursalah” (Unrestricted Public Interest)

The questioner also asks:
Does the principle of Maṣāliḥ Mursalah apply to this issue?

The answer:

◈ Maṣāliḥ Mursalah is not an independent source of Shar‘ī evidence.
Rather, its validity depends on whether it aligns with or contradicts established Sharʿī principles.

❖ Three Scenarios for Maṣāliḥ Mursalah:

  1. If the perceived benefit is proven, and Sharī‘ah confirms its soundness,
    → Then it is part of the objectives of Sharī‘ah itself.
  2. If the perceived benefit leads to something prohibited, or contradicts Islamic principles,
    → Then it is not considered a valid maṣlaḥah, even if someone assumes it to be so.
  3. If the issue is neither supported nor rejected by Sharī‘ah directly,
    → Then the ruling returns to the original Sharʿī default:

    ◈ For acts of worship: The default ruling is prohibition (i.e., nothing is acceptable unless explicitly prescribed).
    ◈ For non-worship (muʿāmalāt, customs, technology): The default ruling is permissibility, unless something is explicitly forbidden.

❖ Summary of Ruling:

✔ Benefiting from the useful, non-religious outputs of disbelievers (such as industry, science, or inventions) is permissible.
✔ Religious or cultural imitation, however, is forbidden.
✔ The principle of Maṣāliḥ Mursalah is not a standalone source of law, but must be validated or invalidated through the lens of Sharʿī guidance.

هٰذَا مَا عِندِي، وَاللّّهُ أَعْلَمُ بِالصَّوَاب
This is what I hold to be correct. And Allah knows best what is right.