The Contradiction in Modern Mentality Regarding Religious and Secular Laws

اردو میں پڑھیں
Font size:

❖ Summary

  • Obedience to traffic laws on motorways is driven not by moral training but by surveillance and fear of punishment.
  • For the modern mindset, coercion in the name of religion is “irrational”, but coercion grounded in modern lifestyle norms is considered “rational”.
  • The reference point for the modern mind is desire, and only that which aligns with personal desires is deemed rational.
  • The issue is not whether something is rational or not, but how “rationality” is being measured.

❖ Moral Behavior and the Coercion of Surveillance

In our society, the relationship between ethical behavior and law is often misunderstood, leading to many contradictions. For example, on motorways, drivers comply strictly with laws due to high surveillance and fines — not out of ethical conviction. On regular roads, where monitoring is lax, the same drivers often ignore laws.

This raises a question: Is such behavior ethical?
Clearly, it’s not rooted in morality but in fear of enforcement. Thus, what appears to be compliance is actually coercion-based discipline, not ethical behavior.

❖ Legal Compulsion vs. Moral Training

Take the seatbelt law in Islamabad — most people only begin wearing seatbelts after facing fines. Eventually, this behavior becomes a habit and is mistaken for morality, even though it originated from legal pressure, not moral consciousness.

❖ The Contradiction of the Modern Mindset

Now consider a law derived from Divine command — such as the Islamic dress code. Why then, do objections arise, with some claiming that reform should come through moral training, not coercion?

This contradiction stems from the modern mind’s flawed framework, which evaluates religion and secular systems by different standards.

❖ Religious Coercion vs. Modern Legal Coercion

To the modern mentality, laws and coercion based on secular (capitalist) norms appear rational and acceptable, while divinely ordained rules are seen as irrational and oppressive. The root cause is not a love for reason but a devotion to desire.

Hence, the modern mind declares something “rational” only when it aligns with its desires, and dismisses anything contrary as irrational or oppressive — even if it’s Divine.

❖ The Real Issue: Not Reason, But Desire

When it comes to modern laws, people obey without hesitation. But when religious principles are introduced, they cry coercion and reject them.
This isn’t truly an issue of reason — it’s a matter of desire being masked as reason.

✿ Summary

❶ Modern compliance with law often stems from coercion, not morality.
❷ Secular coercion is seen as rational; religious coercion as irrational — exposing a double standard.
❸ The true reference point in the modern mind is personal desire, not reason.
❹ The issue is not about reason vs. coercion, but about how selectively rationality is applied — based on desire.