Skip to main content
12 Jumada I 1448 AH

Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah 2989 — Evidence that a name can be denied

حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْجَبَّارِ بْنُ الْعَلاءِ ، وَسَعِيدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ ، وَأَحْمَدُ بْنُ مَنِيعٍ ، وَعَلِيُّ بْنُ خَشْرَمٍ ، قَالَ عَلِيٌّ أَخْبَرَنَا , وَقَالَ الآخَرُونَ : حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ عُيَيْنَةَ ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ دِينَارٍ ، عَنْ عَطَاءٍ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ : " لَيْسَ الْمُحَصَّبُ بِشَيْءٍ ، إِنَّمَا هُوَ مَنْزِلٌ نَزَلَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ " ، قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ : قَوْلُ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ : لَيْسَ الْمُحَصَّبُ بِشَيْءٍ أَرَادَ لَيْسَ بِشَيْءٍ يَجِبُ عَلَى النَّاسِ نُزُولُهُ ، فَنَفي اسْمَ الشَّيْءِ عَنْهُ عَلَى الْمَعْنَى الَّذِي تَرْجَمْتُ الْبَابَ إِذِ الْعِلْمُ مُحِيطٌ أَنَّ نُزُولَ الْمُحَصَّبِ فِعْلٌ ، وَاسْمُ الشَّيْءِ وَاقِعٌ عَلَى الْفِعْلِ ، وَإِنْ كَانَ الْفِعْلُ مُبَاحًا ، وَلا وَاجِبًا
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with both of them) that staying in the valley of Muhassab is not something necessary. Rather, it is just a coincidental place where the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) stayed. Imam Abu Bakr (may Allah have mercy on him) says that the meaning of Sayyiduna Ibn Abbas’s (may Allah be pleased with both of them) statement is that staying in the valley of Muhassab is not obligatory upon people. In this way, he has negated something, even though it is permissible, as I have mentioned in the title of this chapter, because it is certain that staying in the valley of Muhassab is an action, and the name of the valley, Muhassab, is applied to this action (which has been negated, that Muhassab is not something). Even though this action is permissible, it is not obligatory.
Hadith Reference صحيح ابن خزيمه / جماع أبواب ذكر أفعال اختلف الناس فى إباحته للمحرم، نصت سنة النبى صلى الله عليه وسلم أو دلت على إباحتها / 2989
Hadith Takhrij صحيح بخاري

Note: If you notice any problem on the website, please let us know on WhatsApp or by email.

Telegram