A slave who wounds a slave

Al-Hakam and Hammad said that there is no retaliation between slaves.

Al-Sha'bi and al-Hasan said that between slaves there is no retaliation in any offence other than the taking of life.

And from al-Hakam and Hammad, from Ibrahim: They said that between slaves there is no retaliation in what is below the taking of life.

Ibrahim and al-Sha'bi said that there is no retaliation between slaves, nor is there retaliation between children.

Ibn Jurayj said: The report reached me from Salim that when a slave deliberately kills or wounds another slave, retaliation shall be taken from him in return.

Umar bin Abd al-Aziz said that retaliation shall be taken from a slave for a slave in every deliberate act that reaches his value, and in wounds less than that as well.

It is narrated from Abd al-Aziz bin Umar that it is recorded in a document of Umar bin Abd al-Aziz, transmitted from Sayyiduna Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), that retaliation shall be taken from a slave for a slave in a deliberate act that reaches his life and in what is less than that.

Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him) said that retaliation shall not be taken from a slave for a slave, neither for a deliberate wound nor for an accidental one, except for deliberate killing (for in that there is retaliation).

It is narrated from al-Hasan that he held the view that there is retaliation between slaves.

Al-Harith said: I saw Nawfal bin Musahiq taking retaliation for slaves from slaves.