Does the Dead Hear Footsteps? Qur’ān, Ḥadīth, and Narrator Analysis

اردو میں پڑھیں
Font size:
Source: Rulings in the Light of the Quran and Hadith, Chapter on Beliefs, Vol. 1, p. 66

Does the Dead Hear the Sound of Footsteps? Ḥadīth, Qur’ān, and Narrator Analysis

1. Is the Ḥadīth “The Dead Hear the Sound of Footsteps” a Khabar al-Āḥād, and Is Khabar al-Āḥād Valid in ʿAqīdah?

  • Yes, the ḥadīth is khabar al-āḥād (a report narrated by one chain in some levels).
  • However, according to the principles of ḥadīth and ʿaqīdah, a khabar al-āḥād which reaches the level of authenticity (ṣaḥīḥ) is a valid proof in matters of creed as well.
  • This narration is recorded in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and is authentic, thus it can be used as a basis for belief.

2. Is the Ḥadīth in Conflict with the Following Qur’ānic Verses?

The ḥadīth states:

“When a person is buried and people walk away, he hears the sound of their sandals.” (Bukhārī, Kitāb al-Janāʾiz)

The verses in question are:

  • ﴿لَا يَسْمَعُوْا دُعَآءَكُمْ﴾ – “…they do not hear your call.” [Fāṭir: 14]
  • ﴿إِنَّكَ لَا تُسْمِعُ الْمَوْتَى﴾ – “Indeed, you cannot make the dead hear.” [al-Rūm: 52]
  • ﴿وَمَا أَنتَ بِمُسْمِعٍ مَّن فِي الْقُبُورِ﴾ – “…and you cannot make those in the graves hear.” [Fāṭir: 22]

Explanation:

  • These āyāt speak about general conditions — the dead do not hear people’s conversations, calls, or daʿwah.
  • The ḥadīth describes a specific scenario — right after burial, when the deceased hears the sound of the departing footsteps.
  • There is no contradiction; the Qur’ān does not deny this specific occurrence.
  • Since there is no contradiction, the concept of naskh (abrogation) does not apply here.

3. Analysis of the Narrator ʿAbd al-Aʿlā and the Ibn Mājah Report

  • In one isnād of the Bukhārī ḥadīth “hears the sound of sandals” (khabq al-niʿāl), the narrator ʿAbd al-Aʿlā appears.
  • However, in another isnād within Bukhārī, this same ḥadīth is transmitted without ʿAbd al-Aʿlā.
    • This means the authenticity of the ḥadīth is not dependent on ʿAbd al-Aʿlā alone.
  • Regarding Ibn Mājah’s narration about “the verse of stoning and verse of adult breastfeeding being eaten by a goat”:
    • This narration also contains ʿAbd al-Aʿlā.
    • Scholars have graded that particular isnād as ḍaʿīf (weak).
    • The weakness of one narration in which a narrator appears does not invalidate all narrations he transmits, especially when the other narration is supported by stronger, independent chains — as in the case of the khabq al-niʿāl ḥadīth in Bukhārī.

✅ Conclusion:

  • The “hears the sound of sandals” narration is authentic and a valid proof, even in ʿaqīdah.
  • It does not contradict the Qur’ān because the Qur’ānic negation concerns general hearing, whereas the ḥadīth describes a specific event after burial.
  • The narrator ʿAbd al-Aʿlā’s presence in a weak Ibn Mājah narration does not affect the soundness of the Bukhārī narration, as it has multiple authentic chains.