✍️ By: Adnan Masood
❖ Introduction
Mubarak Haider’s book “Tehzeebi Nargisiyat” (Civilizational Narcissism) has stirred considerable interest among intellectual and academic circles. Though the book presents thought-provoking ideas, it is important to acknowledge the stark ideological differences between the author and this reviewer, which may influence the tone of this analysis.
❖ Central Theme
The book advances a narrative that emphasizes the superiority of Western civilization while highlighting perceived flaws within Islamic civilization. The author focuses significantly on the achievements of the West and attributes the decline of Muslim societies to inherent structural weaknesses.
❖ Chapters Overview
Key chapters include:
◈ The Illusion of the Islamic Empire
◈ Exaggeration of Media Freedom
◈ Myth of Judicial Sanctity
◈ Misconception of Intellectual Ownership
◈ Illusion of Secularism
These chapters collectively critique the Islamic world while glorifying Western ideals.
❖ Lack of References
While the author adopts an academic tone, the absence of proper references diminishes the book’s scholarly value. A credible critique requires sources for validation, especially when dealing with historical and socio-political claims. Ironically, while promoting modern scientific values, the book does not meet basic academic standards itself.
❖ Glorification of the West vs. Critique of Islam
The book praises Western civilization as a beacon of modernity and progress, attributing global advancement to its values. Conversely, Islamic civilization is portrayed as trapped in outdated traditions. Yet, when it comes to Western imperialism and world wars, the author adopts a defensive tone, suggesting that Western thought remained unshaken despite these atrocities.
❖ Freedom and Western Society
Haider defends Western liberties, claiming that “modern civilization has acknowledged individual freedoms and rights,” despite acknowledging that such liberties have caused social dilemmas. This opens the debate on whether unbounded freedoms truly yield beneficial outcomes or merely complicate moral structures.
❖ One-Sided Critique of Islam
The book systematically dismisses arguments in favor of Islamic civilization, downplaying its historical achievements. The author discredits the concept of the Caliphate and selectively highlights negative aspects while overlooking significant contributions made by Muslim scholars and states throughout history.
❖ Political Affiliations of the Author
Mubarak Haider’s political inclinations, particularly his ties with the Pakistan People’s Party, are apparent in his sharp criticism of the judiciary and media. His political lens arguably colors his interpretation of civil and institutional frameworks in Muslim societies.
❖ Critical Observations
Several points merit concern:
◈ The lack of scholarly citations weakens the book’s academic integrity.
◈ The defense of the West is not balanced with an equally fair examination of Islamic civilization.
◈ The critique lacks neutrality and often borders on ideological bias.
❖ Conclusion
While “Tehzeebi Nargisiyat” contributes to intellectual discourse, it should be read critically. Readers are encouraged to consult Islamic principles and reliable historical sources for a balanced perspective. The book reflects a particular worldview but does not offer a comprehensive or impartial assessment of civilizations.
