Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
مستدرکِ حاکم
Mustadrak al-Hakim
كتاب النكاح
Book of Marriage
مَنْ تَزَوَّجَ وَلَمْ يَفْرِضْ صَدَاقًا
One who marries without fixing a dowry
Mustadrak al-Hakim — Hadith 2772M
اُردوEn
سمعتُ أبا عبد الله محمد بن يعقوب الحافظ وقيل له: سمعتَ الحسن بن سفيان يقول: سمعتُ حرملة بن يحيى يقول: سمعتُ الشافعي يقول: إن صحَّ حديث بَرْوَعَ بنتِ واشِقٍ قلتُ به. فقال أبو عبد الله: لو حضرتُ الشافعيَّ رضي الله عنه لقمتُ على رؤوس أصحابه، وقلتُ: فقد صحَّ الحديثُ، فقُلْ به. قال الحاكم: فالشافعي إنما قال: لو صحَّ الحديثُ، لأنَّ هذه الرواية وإن كانت صحيحةً فإنَّ الفتوى فيه لعبد الله بن مسعود، وسنَدُ الحديث لِنَفَر من أشجَعَ، وشيخُنا أبو عبد الله رحمه الله إنما حَكَمَ بصحّة الحديث لأنَّ الثقة قد سمَّى فيه رجلًا من الصحابة، وهو مَعقِلُ بن سِنان الأشجعي. وبصحة ما ذكرتُه:
It is narrated from Abu Abdullah Muhammad bin Ya'qub al-Hafiz that he heard this statement of Imam al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him): "If the hadith of Barwa' bint Washiq is proven authentic, I will adopt it as my position." Abu Abdullah said: "Had I been in the time of Imam al-Shafi'i (may Allah be pleased with him), I would have stood before his students and said: 'This hadith has indeed been proven authentic, so now adopt the position according to it.'"
Imam al-Hakim says: Imam al-Shafi'i withheld judgement on its authenticity because, although this narration was sound, the verdict was that of Abdullah bin Mas'ud, and (at that time) the chain went back to some unknown people of the tribe of Ashja'; whereas our Shaykh Abu Abdullah ruled it authentic because a trustworthy narrator explicitly named a reliable Companion in it, namely Ma'qil bin Sinan al-Ashja'i (may Allah be pleased with him).
What I have mentioned is supported by the following:
Imam al-Hakim says: Imam al-Shafi'i withheld judgement on its authenticity because, although this narration was sound, the verdict was that of Abdullah bin Mas'ud, and (at that time) the chain went back to some unknown people of the tribe of Ashja'; whereas our Shaykh Abu Abdullah ruled it authentic because a trustworthy narrator explicitly named a reliable Companion in it, namely Ma'qil bin Sinan al-Ashja'i (may Allah be pleased with him).
What I have mentioned is supported by the following:
