Source: Fatāwā al-Dīn al-Khāliṣ, Vol. 1, Page 384
❖ Research Question:
Is wiping the neck during Wudu a mustahabb (recommended) act in Islam?
What is the authenticity of the narrations used to support this practice?
Scholarly Context & Principle:
Shaykh Rashid Ahmad Gangohi (رحمه الله) in Ahsan al-Fatawa (2/12) declared wiping the neck as mustahabb and cited five narrations as evidence.
However, Fatāwā al-Dīn al-Khāliṣ (Fatwa #169) and scholars like Imam al-Nawawi (رحمه الله) regarded this as a bid‘ah (innovation).
Foundational Principle of Mustahabb Acts:
A Shar‘i ruling such as istihbāb (recommendation) must be based on:
◈ The Qur'an
◈ Authentic Sunnah
◈ Ijma‘ (consensus)
✿ Conditions for Acting on Weak Hadith (If ever):
➊ The Hadith must not be fabricated (mawḍū‘)
➋ The weakness must be known to the practitioner
➌ The act must not be widespread or considered a Sunnah
- Ibn Ḥajar: Tabyīn al-‘Ajab, p. 403
- al-Qasimi: Qawā‘id al-Taḥdīth, p. 114–118
- Ibn Taymiyyah: Minhāj al-Sunnah
Detailed Analysis of the 4 Narrations on Wiping the Neck:
➊ Hadith of Ka‘b ibn ʿAmr (رضي الله عنه)
- Layth ibn Sulaym – Weak by consensus
- Muṣarrif ibn ‘Amr – Unknown (majhūl)
- Word “al-qadhāl” in Abu Dawood’s version does not mean the neck
➋ Hadith of Ibn ʿUmar (رضي الله عنهما)
- Muḥammad ibn ʿAmr al-Anṣārī – Weak
- Narration is Fabricated (mawḍū‘)
➌ Athar of Mūsā ibn Ṭalḥah
- Claimed by some to be mauqūf but "marfū‘ in implication"
- Incorrect logic, as Mūsā ibn Ṭalḥah is not a Companion, but a Successor (tābi‘ī)
- Contains al-Mas‘ūdī – a confused (mukhtaṭiṭ) narrator
➍ Narration of al-Daylamī (Musnad al-Firdaws)
- Muḥammad ibn ʿAmr al-Anṣārī, Abū Sahl al-Baṣrī – Both weak
- Declared fabricated by Imam al-Nawawī (رحمه الله)
Scholarly Opinions on the Matter:
❖ Imam Ibn al-Qayyim (رحمه الله):
“There is no authentic Hadith on wiping the neck in Wudu.”
❖ Imam Ibn Taymiyyah (رحمه الله):
“There is no authentic Hadith from the Prophet ﷺ that he wiped the neck during Wudu.
All Sahih narrations of Wudu do not include this action.”
❖ View of the Four Madhāhib:
- Imām Mālik
- Imām al-Shāfiʿī
- Imām Aḥmad
- Majority of Scholars (Jumhūr)
❖ Source of the Misunderstanding:
The view of Rashid Ahmad Gangohi is based on:
- Weak narrations
- Athar of Abu Hurayrah (رضي الله عنه) – not marfū‘
- Assumption that weak narrations support istihbāb – rejected in Usūl
Conclusion:
| Aspect | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Authentic evidence for wiping neck in Wudu | |
| Validity of cited Hadiths | |
| Wudu completeness if neck is not wiped | |
| Ruling on wiping neck | |
| Shar‘i status | ⚠ Considered bid‘ah by scholars |
❝One who follows evidence must abstain from wiping the neck, and not follow unsupported fatwas.❞
وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ بِالصَّوَاب