Four Research-Based Critiques of Ibn ʿUmar’s Alleged Non-Rafʿ Narration

✦ Four Scholarly Critiques on the Narration Attributed to Ibn ʿUmar Regarding Abandoning Rafʿ al-Yadayn​


Source: Fatāwā ʿIlmiyyah, Volume 1, Kitāb al-Ṣalāh, Page 348
Topic: Critical Evaluation of the Narration Claiming Ibn ʿUmar رضي الله عنهما Practiced Rafʿ al-Yadayn Only at the Initial Takbīrah


❖ The Report​


Narration:
"I prayed behind Ibn ʿUmar, and he would not raise his hands except at the first Takbīrah of the prayer."
Narrated by:
— Ibn Abī Dāwūd
— from Aḥmad ibn Yūnus
— from Abū Bakr ibn ʿAyyāsh
— from Ḥuṣayn
— from Mujāhid
(Source: Sharḥ Maʿānī al-Āthār, p. 235; Ibn Abī Shaybah, Vol. –, p. 237)


❖ Evaluation of the Narration​


✦ Verdict:​


This narration has been declared weak and a mistake by several leading scholars of ḥadīth.


❖ Four Key Analytical Points​


Statement of Imām Yaḥyā ibn Maʿīn رحمه الله


“The ḥadīth of Abū Bakr from Ḥuṣayn is only a delusion (wahm). It has **no basis (lā aṣl lahu).”
(Source: Juzʾ Rafʿ al-Yadayn, p. 16; Naṣb al-Rāyah, 1/392)


✅ This is a clear and decisive criticism from one of the foremost experts in ḥadīth criticism. His statement renders the narration unacceptable.


Statement of Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal رحمه الله


“This narration — reported by Abū Bakr ibn ʿAyyāsh from Ḥuṣayn from Mujāhid from Ibn ʿUmar — is **false (bāṭil).”
(Source: Masāʾil Aḥmad, Riwayah of Ibn Hānī, Vol. –, p. 50)


🔍 Imām Aḥmad, a foundational figure among the four great Imāms, unequivocally rejected the narration.


➌ Clarification About Abū Bakr ibn ʿAyyāsh​


While some earlier scholars criticized him, later research confirms that the majority of ḥadīth scholars consider him trustworthy (ṣadūq wa mawthūq).


📌 This updated position has been explained in:
Māhnāmah al-Ḥadīth (Hazro), Issue 28, p. 54
— Dated: 22 Rabīʿ al-Thānī 1427 AH


📝 The author of the article has clearly retracted his earlier stance, in which he considered Abū Bakr ibn ʿAyyāsh to be weak.


➡ However, the weakness of the narration still stands, due to its content (matn) and being contradicted (shādh).


Contradiction with Authentic Reports


📌 Authentic narrations from Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and other reliable sources confirm:


◈ Ibn ʿUmar رضي الله عنه used to perform Rafʿ al-Yadayn consistently
— At the start, before Rukūʿ, and after rising from Rukūʿ.
(Source: Ḥadīth al-Sirāj, 2/34, Ḥadīth 115)


✅ Those who abandoned Rafʿ al-Yadayn were even reprimanded:


Ibn ʿUmar used to throw pebbles at one who did not raise his hands.
(Juzʾ Rafʿ al-Yadayn by al-Bukhārī; also referenced in Shahādat, July 2000)


✅ Conclusion​


This narration:


◉ Has been declared delusional (وهم) by Imām Ibn Maʿīn
◉ Labeled false (باطل) by Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal
◉ Contradicts authentic and mutawātir narrations from Ibn ʿUmar himself
◉ Is not reliable in proving abandonment of Rafʿ al-Yadayn


Therefore, Rafʿ al-Yadayn remains a proven and legislated Sunnah, consistently practiced by ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿUmar and upheld by the Ṣaḥābah and Tābiʿīn.


ھٰذَا مَا عِندِي، وَاللّٰهُ أَعْلَمُ بِالصَّوَاب
 
Back
Top
Telegram
Facebook