Here, we present a mention of fabricated, concocted, and false books attributed to the four famous Imams, although all three Imams are innocent of these books.
The renowned Arabic researcher Abu Ubaida Mashhour bin Hasan Al-Salman writes:
◈ Hafiz Dhahabi (may Allah have mercy on him) states:
1. Al-Fiqh al-Akbar Attributed to Imam Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him)
A book titled "Al-Fiqh al-Akbar" has been attributed to Imam Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him), published by Mustafa Ahmed Al-Baz under the title "Al-Kawkab al-Azhar Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar" from "Al-Maktaba Al-Tijariya, Makkah Mukarramah," Saudi Arabia. The following are a few reasons why this book is considered fabricated and concocted:- The scribe (writer) is unknown.
- The chain of narration from the scribe to Imam Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him) is unknown.
- In the version published by Mustafa Al-Baz, a brief introduction to the book's manuscripts is given:
- Printed in 1900.
- Manuscript by Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Ahmad Al-Rawi (unknown), written in modern times?
- Manuscript by Shihab al-Din bin Ahmad bin Muslih al-Basri, died 986 AH?
- Manuscript by Ahmad bin Sheikh Darwish al-Khatib (modern)?
- A non-Muslim named Carl Brockelmann attributed this book to Imam Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him).
Observations by Scholars
◈ Haji Khalifa writes:This "some of the great scholars" is an unknown figure.لكن فيه شك و الظن الغالب أنه من تأليف بعض أكا بر العلماء"But there is doubt in this attribution (to Imam Shafi'i), and the prevailing assumption is that it is the work of some of the great scholars."[Kashf al-Zunun 2/1288]
The renowned Arabic researcher Abu Ubaida Mashhour bin Hasan Al-Salman writes:
Sheikh Saleh al-Maqbali also denied that this book was authored by Imam Shafi'i. See "Al-Ilm al-Shamikh fi Ithar al-Haqq 'ala al-Aba' wa al-Mashayikh" [p. 180].الفقه الأكبر : المكذوب على الإمام محمد بن إدريس الشافعي"Al-Fiqh al-Akbar: a fabrication attributed to Imam Muhammad bin Idris al-Shafi'i."[Kitab Hadhr Minha al-Ulama 2/293]
- None of Imam Shafi'i's students or early scholars like Al-Bayhaqi mentioned this book.
Anecdote
In "Al-Kawkab al-Azhar Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar," falsely attributed to Imam Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him), it is written:ولا يكفي ايمان المقلد"And the faith of a blind follower (in matters of creed and fundamentals of religion) is not sufficient."[p. 42]
2. Al-Fiqh al-Akbar Attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa (may Allah have mercy on him)
The printed version of "Al-Fiqh al-Akbar" with the commentary by Mulla Ali Qari does not have any chain of narration from the scribe, the writer, or from the scribe to Imam Abu Hanifa. Haji Khalifa writes:Abu Muti' al-Hakam bin Abdullah al-Balkhi is considered unreliable by the majority of hadith scholars. He was declared weak by Ibn Ma'in, Bukhari, Nasa'i, and others.روي عنه أبو مطيع البلخي"It is narrated from Imam Abu Hanifa by Abu Muti' al-Balkhi."[Kashf al-Zunun 2/1287]
Regarding a hadith, Hafiz Dhahabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:[Kitab al-Du'afa wa al-Matrukin 654]
This means Abu Muti' was a fabricator (one who invents hadiths). Below Abu Muti', the chain of narration for this manuscript is unknown. Another scholar has attached a different chain of narration to this book.فهذا وضعه أبو مطيع على حماد"This is fabricated by Abu Muti' upon Hammad (bin Salamah)."[Mizan al-I'tidal 3/42, No. 5523]
This chain includes many unknown, unfamiliar, and unverified narrators:[See Majmu'a al-Rasail al-'Ashara p. 17]
- Nasr bin Yahya al-Balkhi
- Ali bin Ahmad al-Farsi
- Ali bin al-Husayn al-Ghazali
- Nasran bin Nasr al-Khatli
- Husayn bin al-Husayn al-Kashghari, among others
Note:
In this fabricated treatise "Al-Fiqh al-Akbar," it is written:In contrast, Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri, a Deobandi scholar, says:فما ذكر الله تعالىٰ في القرآن من ذكر الوجه واليد والنفس فهو صفات بلا كيف ولا يقال : أن يده قدرته و نعمته لأن فيه ابطال الصفة وهو قول اهل القدر والإعتزال ولكن يده صفته بلا كيف"Whatever Allah Almighty mentioned in the Quran about His Face, Hand, and Self are attributes without 'how,' and it should not be said that His Hand means His power and grace, as this negates the attribute. This is the saying of the Qadariyyah and Mu'tazilah. Instead, it should be said that His Hand is an attribute without 'how'."[p. 19 and with the commentary of al-Qari p. 36, 37]
This shows that according to this book (Al-Fiqh al-Akbar), the Deobandi scholars are following the Mu'tazilah's doctrine."For example, it is possible that by 'Istawa' is meant dominance, and by 'Hand' is meant (power), this is also correct according to us."[Al-Muhannad p. 42, answer to question 14, 13, The ruling on praying behind an innovator p. 18]
3. The Book "Al-Salat" Attributed to Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (may Allah have mercy on him) is Not Authentic
The book "Al-Salat" attributed to Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (may Allah have mercy on him) is not authentic.◈ Hafiz Dhahabi (may Allah have mercy on him) states:
وكتاب : الرسالة فى الصلوة، قلت : هو موضوع على الإمام"The book 'Al-Risala fi al-Salat' is falsely attributed to the Imam (Ahmad)."[Siyar A'lam al-Nubala 11/330]