Authenticity of the Story About ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb’s Letter to the Nile

Did ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb رضي الله عنه Really Write a Letter to the Nile? – A Critical Analysis
(Excerpt: Fatāwā ʿIlmiyyah – Tawḍīḥ al-Aḥkām, Vol. 2, p. 471)


Question:


Is it true that when the flow of the Nile stopped, ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb رضي الله عنه wrote a letter to the river, and when the letter was thrown into it, the water began to flow again?


Answer:


Alḥamdulillāh, and may peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah.


Sources of the Story:


This incident is reported with the chain:
Ibn Lahīʿah → Qays ibn Ḥajjāj → from someone who narrated to him


It appears in:


  • Futūḥ Miṣr by Ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥakam (pp. 150–151)
  • Kitāb al-ʿAẓamah by Abū al-Shaykh (4/1424–1425, ḥadīth 937)
  • Sharḥ Iʿtiqād Ahl al-Sunnah by al-Lālikāʾī (2/401, ḥadīth 76 – Karāmāt)
  • Karāmāt Awliyāʾ Allāh (p. 66)
  • Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr (3/464, al-Sajdah: 27)
  • Musnad al-Fārūq (1/223–224)
  • Al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah (1/23)

Chain Analysis:


  • ʿAbdullāh ibn Lahīʿah – a mudallis narrator (Ṭabaqāt al-Mudallisin, 5/140)
  • Narrated here with ʿanʿanah, which is unacceptable from a mudallis unless explicitly stating hearing.
  • Qays ibn al-Ḥajjāj – a tābiʿ al-tābiʿī, but the person from whom he narrates is unknown.
  • The chain is therefore majhūl (unknown) and ḍaʿīf (weak).

Such a chain falls under what scholars call “ẓulumāt” (dark/unreliable reports).


Summary of the Story:


  • Upon Egypt’s conquest, locals told ʿAmr ibn al-ʿĀṣ رضي الله عنه:

    “The Nile only flows when, on the 11th night of this month, a girl is thrown into it.”

  • ʿAmr رضي الله عنه replied:

    “In Islam, such customs are not allowed.”

  • He wrote to ʿUmar رضي الله عنه about it.
  • ʿUmar رضي الله عنه sent a letter addressed to the Nile:

    “From the servant of Allah, ʿUmar, to the Nile of Egypt:
    If you flow of your own accord, then do not flow.
    But if Allah is the One who makes you flow, then I ask Allah, the One, the Irresistible, to make you flow.”


  • The letter was thrown into the river, and the water rose ten cubits and began to flow.

Final Ruling:


  • The chain is weak due to tadlīs and an unknown narrator.
  • The report is rejected (mardūd) and cannot be relied upon.
  • Therefore, the entire story is baseless and unauthentic.


Allah knows best.
 
Back
Top
Telegram
Facebook